Patient Perspectives on Delayed Specialty Follow-Up After a Primary Care Visit.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Leonor Fernández, Dru Ricci, Amie Pollack, Maelys J Amat, Meghan Drielak, Talya Salant, Gordon D Schiff, Umber Shafiq, Scot B Sternberg, James Benneyan, Mark Aronson, Erin Sullivan, Russell S Phillips
{"title":"Patient Perspectives on Delayed Specialty Follow-Up After a Primary Care Visit.","authors":"Leonor Fernández, Dru Ricci, Amie Pollack, Maelys J Amat, Meghan Drielak, Talya Salant, Gordon D Schiff, Umber Shafiq, Scot B Sternberg, James Benneyan, Mark Aronson, Erin Sullivan, Russell S Phillips","doi":"10.3122/jabfm.2024.240063R3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients are often referred for important diagnostic tests or consultations after a concerning symptom or finding is identified at a primary care visit, but many referrals are delayed or not completed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this qualitative study, we reviewed electronic health record data to identify patients who did not have timely completion of a recommended referral at an academic primary care hospital-based practice and an affiliated community health center. Using semistructured interview guides, we interviewed 15 patients who did not complete a cardiac stress test within 28 days of a primary care visit associated with a diagnosis of chest pain, and 15 patients who did not complete a dermatology referral within 90 days of identification of a concerning skin lesion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thematic analysis highlighted 3 areas: 1) Patients desired clear communication to inform, equip and empower them, 2) Clinician-patient communication regarding a referral's rationale and value is key, and 3) Referral appointment processes were often challenging and/or delayed. Patients wished to understand why they were being referred, the specific value and reason for the referral, and what to expect. We developed a conceptual model describing how the initial clinician-patient communication may influence referral completion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Failure to close diagnostic loops may be more likely when a patient is not given sufficient meaningful information, particularly if there is health system \"friction\" that reduces the patient's ability and ease to obtain a timely diagnostic referral appointment. Clinicians should use accessible language to communicate why a diagnostic referral is useful and important for the patient's health, and include a specific optimal time frame. The initial communication and the ease of the subsequent appointment booking both matter, and may compound or mitigate each other's effect. To reduce diagnostic referral failures and delays. clinicians should advocate for consistent appointment booking processes that systematically inform, equip, and empower patients with clear and meaningful referral information and timely appointments.</p>","PeriodicalId":50018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","volume":"38 1","pages":"139-153"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12096378/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2024.240063R3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients are often referred for important diagnostic tests or consultations after a concerning symptom or finding is identified at a primary care visit, but many referrals are delayed or not completed.

Methods: In this qualitative study, we reviewed electronic health record data to identify patients who did not have timely completion of a recommended referral at an academic primary care hospital-based practice and an affiliated community health center. Using semistructured interview guides, we interviewed 15 patients who did not complete a cardiac stress test within 28 days of a primary care visit associated with a diagnosis of chest pain, and 15 patients who did not complete a dermatology referral within 90 days of identification of a concerning skin lesion.

Results: Thematic analysis highlighted 3 areas: 1) Patients desired clear communication to inform, equip and empower them, 2) Clinician-patient communication regarding a referral's rationale and value is key, and 3) Referral appointment processes were often challenging and/or delayed. Patients wished to understand why they were being referred, the specific value and reason for the referral, and what to expect. We developed a conceptual model describing how the initial clinician-patient communication may influence referral completion.

Conclusions: Failure to close diagnostic loops may be more likely when a patient is not given sufficient meaningful information, particularly if there is health system "friction" that reduces the patient's ability and ease to obtain a timely diagnostic referral appointment. Clinicians should use accessible language to communicate why a diagnostic referral is useful and important for the patient's health, and include a specific optimal time frame. The initial communication and the ease of the subsequent appointment booking both matter, and may compound or mitigate each other's effect. To reduce diagnostic referral failures and delays. clinicians should advocate for consistent appointment booking processes that systematically inform, equip, and empower patients with clear and meaningful referral information and timely appointments.

初级保健访问后延迟专科随访的患者观点。
背景:在初级保健访问中发现相关症状或发现后,患者经常被转诊进行重要的诊断检查或咨询,但许多转诊被延迟或未完成。方法:在这项定性研究中,我们回顾了电子健康记录数据,以确定在学术初级保健医院和附属社区卫生中心没有及时完成推荐转诊的患者。使用半结构化访谈指南,我们采访了15例在胸痛诊断相关的初级保健就诊后28天内未完成心脏负荷测试的患者,以及15例在确定相关皮肤病变后90天内未完成皮肤科转诊的患者。结果:专题分析强调了3个方面:1)患者需要明确的沟通,以告知、装备和授权他们;2)关于转诊的理由和价值的临床与患者沟通是关键;3)转诊预约过程经常具有挑战性和/或延迟。患者希望了解他们被转诊的原因,转诊的具体价值和原因,以及期望什么。我们开发了一个概念模型来描述最初的医患沟通如何影响转诊的完成。结论:当患者没有获得足够的有意义的信息时,特别是如果存在卫生系统“摩擦”,降低了患者获得及时诊断转诊预约的能力和便利性,则更有可能无法关闭诊断循环。临床医生应该使用通俗易懂的语言来说明为什么诊断转诊对病人的健康是有用和重要的,并包括一个具体的最佳时间框架。最初的沟通和随后预约的便利性都很重要,可能会加重或减轻彼此的影响。减少诊断转诊失败和延误。临床医生应倡导一致的预约程序,系统地告知、装备和授权患者明确和有意义的转诊信息和及时预约。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1988, the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine ( JABFM ) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM). Believing that the public and scientific communities are best served by open access to information, JABFM makes its articles available free of charge and without registration at www.jabfm.org. JABFM is indexed by Medline, Index Medicus, and other services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信