Factors associated with positive findings of deep infection on computed tomography among patients with extremity cellulitis.

IF 2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Diagnosis Pub Date : 2025-04-11 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1515/dx-2024-0156
Cynthia E Burke, Owen R Maley, Benjamin Mancini, Sahil Sardesai, Austin B Montgomery, Tonya S King, Donald J Flemming
{"title":"Factors associated with positive findings of deep infection on computed tomography among patients with extremity cellulitis.","authors":"Cynthia E Burke, Owen R Maley, Benjamin Mancini, Sahil Sardesai, Austin B Montgomery, Tonya S King, Donald J Flemming","doi":"10.1515/dx-2024-0156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Cellulitis shares several clinical features with fulminant deep soft tissue infections, creating a diagnostic dilemma for which clinicians are increasingly using cross-sectional diagnostic imaging to resolve. However, the role of imaging in apparent cellulitis is poorly defined. In particular, the clinical utility of CT in extremity cellulitis is underexplored. The purpose of this study was to determine patient and clinical factors that increase likelihood for finding of deep infection on CT among patients with extremity cellulitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was performed of patients with cellulitis of the extremities who were examined with computed tomography from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2021. Demographics, medical history, and clinical and laboratory characteristics were collected. The presence of positive findings on CT report was recorded. Repeated measures logistic regression was used to evaluate significant predictors of positive CT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 496 eligible patient encounters, and CT was positive for deep infection in 39 cases (7.9 %). Median patient age was 56 years of age, 58.1 % were male, and most patients had a history of diabetes mellitus, history of tobacco use, and/or obesity. Significant predictors for positive CT on multivariable analysis included gas on pre-CT radiographs, febrile leukopenic state, injection drug use, purulence on exam, and white blood cell count extremes. Elevated CRP was also a significant positive predictor on bivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Finding a deep infection on CT in a patient with extremity cellulitis is uncommon and is predominantly associated with a high-risk clinical picture, and/or with high index of suspicion based on pre-CT plain films. In the absence of these patient factors or compelling findings on radiographs, CT does not typically provide clinically actionable information for extremity cellulitis and should not be used as part of standard evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11273,"journal":{"name":"Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":"413-423"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2024-0156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Cellulitis shares several clinical features with fulminant deep soft tissue infections, creating a diagnostic dilemma for which clinicians are increasingly using cross-sectional diagnostic imaging to resolve. However, the role of imaging in apparent cellulitis is poorly defined. In particular, the clinical utility of CT in extremity cellulitis is underexplored. The purpose of this study was to determine patient and clinical factors that increase likelihood for finding of deep infection on CT among patients with extremity cellulitis.

Methods: A retrospective observational study was performed of patients with cellulitis of the extremities who were examined with computed tomography from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2021. Demographics, medical history, and clinical and laboratory characteristics were collected. The presence of positive findings on CT report was recorded. Repeated measures logistic regression was used to evaluate significant predictors of positive CT.

Results: There were 496 eligible patient encounters, and CT was positive for deep infection in 39 cases (7.9 %). Median patient age was 56 years of age, 58.1 % were male, and most patients had a history of diabetes mellitus, history of tobacco use, and/or obesity. Significant predictors for positive CT on multivariable analysis included gas on pre-CT radiographs, febrile leukopenic state, injection drug use, purulence on exam, and white blood cell count extremes. Elevated CRP was also a significant positive predictor on bivariate analysis.

Conclusions: Finding a deep infection on CT in a patient with extremity cellulitis is uncommon and is predominantly associated with a high-risk clinical picture, and/or with high index of suspicion based on pre-CT plain films. In the absence of these patient factors or compelling findings on radiographs, CT does not typically provide clinically actionable information for extremity cellulitis and should not be used as part of standard evaluation.

四肢蜂窝织炎患者计算机断层扫描深部感染阳性结果的相关因素。
目的:蜂窝织炎与暴发性深部软组织感染有几个共同的临床特征,造成了一个诊断困境,临床医生越来越多地使用横断面诊断成像来解决。然而,影像学在蜂窝织炎中的作用还不明确。特别是,CT在四肢蜂窝织炎中的临床应用尚未得到充分的探讨。本研究的目的是确定增加四肢蜂窝织炎患者CT上发现深部感染可能性的患者和临床因素。方法:回顾性观察研究2012年1月1日至2021年12月31日行计算机断层扫描的四肢蜂窝织炎患者。收集了人口统计学、病史、临床和实验室特征。记录CT报告阳性表现。采用重复测量逻辑回归评估CT阳性的显著预测因素。结果:入选病例496例,CT阳性39例(7.9% %)。患者年龄中位数为56岁,58.1% 为男性,大多数患者有糖尿病史、吸烟史和/或肥胖史。在多变量分析中,CT阳性的重要预测因素包括CT前x线片上的气体、发热性白细胞减少状态、注射药物使用、检查时脓性和白细胞计数极端。在双变量分析中,CRP升高也是显著的阳性预测因子。结论:在四肢蜂窝织炎患者的CT上发现深部感染是罕见的,主要与高危临床表现和/或基于CT前平片的高怀疑指数相关。在缺乏这些患者因素或x线片上令人信服的发现的情况下,CT通常不能为四肢蜂窝织炎提供临床可操作的信息,不应作为标准评估的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diagnosis
Diagnosis MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Diagnosis focuses on how diagnosis can be advanced, how it is taught, and how and why it can fail, leading to diagnostic errors. The journal welcomes both fundamental and applied works, improvement initiatives, opinions, and debates to encourage new thinking on improving this critical aspect of healthcare quality.  Topics: -Factors that promote diagnostic quality and safety -Clinical reasoning -Diagnostic errors in medicine -The factors that contribute to diagnostic error: human factors, cognitive issues, and system-related breakdowns -Improving the value of diagnosis – eliminating waste and unnecessary testing -How culture and removing blame promote awareness of diagnostic errors -Training and education related to clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills -Advances in laboratory testing and imaging that improve diagnostic capability -Local, national and international initiatives to reduce diagnostic error
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信