Efficacy and safety of cancer vaccine therapy in malignant melanoma: a systematic review.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Takeshi Seta, Shohei Nakamura, Mitsuaki Oura, Kazuki Yokoyama, Yoshitaka Nishikawa, Nobuaki Hoshino, Kiichiro Ninomiya, Tatsunori Shimoi, Katsuyuki Hotta, Takeo Nakayama
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of cancer vaccine therapy in malignant melanoma: a systematic review.","authors":"Takeshi Seta, Shohei Nakamura, Mitsuaki Oura, Kazuki Yokoyama, Yoshitaka Nishikawa, Nobuaki Hoshino, Kiichiro Ninomiya, Tatsunori Shimoi, Katsuyuki Hotta, Takeo Nakayama","doi":"10.1007/s10147-025-02753-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Malignant melanoma is a cancer that develops from melanocytes in the skin and mucous membranes. Surgery, and chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or immunotherapy are also used in cases of distant metastasis. Immunotherapy includes immune checkpoint inhibitors and cancer vaccine therapy; however, their efficacy remains limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis of cancer vaccine therapies were conducted. PubMed was used to search the literature up to December 2023, and clinical trials were also identified for the same period. RCTs involving patients with resectable or unresectable malignant melanoma were included. The primary outcome was OS, and secondary outcomes were PFS, DFS, and RFS. Safety was assessed based on AEs. Integrated results were presented as risk ratio and risk difference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial search identified 418 studies on cancer vaccine therapy and 44 studies on effector T-cell therapy. We supplemented this with our PubMed search, extracting 149 studies. After database searches and screening, 611 studies were initially considered. Following exclusions based on eligibility criteria, 20 RCTs using cancer vaccines remained. For the primary outcome, OS, the pooled RR was 1.11 (95% CI, 0.97-1.32, I<sup>2</sup> = 59.0%), and the pooled RD was 0.02 (-0.01 to 0.06, I<sup>2</sup> = 74.0%) at 12 months. PFS, DFS, and RFS did not show statistically significant differences, and AEs did not increase significantly.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cancer vaccine therapy, neither alone, or in combination with other agents for malignant melanoma did not show a significant improvement in OS, PFS, DFS, or RFS nor did it significantly increase AEs.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1080-1097"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-025-02753-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Malignant melanoma is a cancer that develops from melanocytes in the skin and mucous membranes. Surgery, and chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or immunotherapy are also used in cases of distant metastasis. Immunotherapy includes immune checkpoint inhibitors and cancer vaccine therapy; however, their efficacy remains limited.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cancer vaccine therapies were conducted. PubMed was used to search the literature up to December 2023, and clinical trials were also identified for the same period. RCTs involving patients with resectable or unresectable malignant melanoma were included. The primary outcome was OS, and secondary outcomes were PFS, DFS, and RFS. Safety was assessed based on AEs. Integrated results were presented as risk ratio and risk difference.

Results: The initial search identified 418 studies on cancer vaccine therapy and 44 studies on effector T-cell therapy. We supplemented this with our PubMed search, extracting 149 studies. After database searches and screening, 611 studies were initially considered. Following exclusions based on eligibility criteria, 20 RCTs using cancer vaccines remained. For the primary outcome, OS, the pooled RR was 1.11 (95% CI, 0.97-1.32, I2 = 59.0%), and the pooled RD was 0.02 (-0.01 to 0.06, I2 = 74.0%) at 12 months. PFS, DFS, and RFS did not show statistically significant differences, and AEs did not increase significantly.

Conclusion: Cancer vaccine therapy, neither alone, or in combination with other agents for malignant melanoma did not show a significant improvement in OS, PFS, DFS, or RFS nor did it significantly increase AEs.

肿瘤疫苗治疗恶性黑色素瘤的疗效和安全性:系统综述。
恶性黑色素瘤是一种由皮肤和粘膜中的黑色素细胞发展而来的癌症。手术、化疗、放射治疗或免疫治疗也用于远处转移的病例。免疫治疗包括免疫检查点抑制剂和癌症疫苗治疗;然而,它们的功效仍然有限。方法:对癌症疫苗治疗进行系统回顾和荟萃分析。使用PubMed检索截至2023年12月的文献,并确定了同一时期的临床试验。包括可切除或不可切除的恶性黑色素瘤患者的随机对照试验。主要终点为OS,次要终点为PFS、DFS和RFS。以ae评价安全性。综合结果以风险比和风险差表示。结果:最初的搜索确定了418项癌症疫苗治疗研究和44项效应t细胞治疗研究。我们补充了PubMed检索,提取了149项研究。经过数据库搜索和筛选,最初考虑了611项研究。在根据合格标准排除后,仍有20项使用癌症疫苗的随机对照试验。对于主要终点OS, 12个月时的合并RR为1.11 (95% CI, 0.97-1.32, I2 = 59.0%),合并RD为0.02(-0.01至0.06,I2 = 74.0%)。PFS、DFS、RFS无统计学差异,ae无显著升高。结论:癌症疫苗治疗,无论是单独治疗还是与其他药物联合治疗恶性黑色素瘤,都没有显示出OS、PFS、DFS或RFS的显著改善,也没有显着增加ae。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Oncology (IJCO) welcomes original research papers on all aspects of clinical oncology that report the results of novel and timely investigations. Reports on clinical trials are encouraged. Experimental studies will also be accepted if they have obvious relevance to clinical oncology. Membership in the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology is not a prerequisite for submission to the journal. Papers are received on the understanding that: their contents have not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; that they are subject to peer review by at least two referees and the Editors, and to editorial revision of the language and contents; and that the Editors are responsible for their acceptance, rejection, and order of publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信