Permissive Telehealth State Licensure Policies Are Associated with Increased Telehealth Utilization.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Telemedicine and e-Health Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-12 DOI:10.1089/tmj.2025.0089
Priyanka Vakkalanka, Tracy Young, Knute D Carter, Fred Ullrich, Marcia M Ward, Nicholas M Mohr
{"title":"Permissive Telehealth State Licensure Policies Are Associated with Increased Telehealth Utilization.","authors":"Priyanka Vakkalanka, Tracy Young, Knute D Carter, Fred Ullrich, Marcia M Ward, Nicholas M Mohr","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2025.0089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> State professional licensure has been cited as a significant barrier to widespread telehealth adoption, and states have developed strategies to reduce such licensure burdens through policy changes. We aimed to measure the association between state-level medical licensure policies and outpatient telehealth utilization between 2018 and 2022 among Medicare beneficiaries. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a quasi-experimental study of a 5% sample of age-qualifying Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries between January 2018 and December 2022. We assessed state-level medical licensure policy for telehealth visits, captured as participation in Interstate Medical Licensure Compact (IMLC) before the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE) and/or policy relaxation during the COVID-19 PHE. Outcomes included out-of-state telehealth (OOS-TH) and in-state telehealth (IS-TH). We evaluated the association between state-level policies and outcomes through logistic regression, adjusting for patient-level characteristics and month/year of the encounter. <b>Results:</b> We analyzed 141,199,029 outpatient encounters for 1,682,501 Medicare beneficiaries. In the pre-COVID-19 era, IMLC participation was associated with higher OOS-TH (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.24; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.09-2.40) but not IS-TH (aOR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.96-1.01). In the COVID-19 era, we observed higher IS-TH in IMLC-only states (aOR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.08-1.10) and states with COVID-19 policy relaxations (aOR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.10-1.12). We observed lower OOS-TH utilization by IMLC participation (aOR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.72-0.75) and COVID-19 policy relaxations (aOR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.81-0.85). <b>Conclusions:</b> Permissive licensure policies were higher telehealth utilization, though we observed mixed effects in telehealth type (IS-TH vs. OOS-TH) and by time (pre-COVID-19 vs. COVID-19). Variability in IS-TH and OOS-TH utilization may indicate that while local policies can improve telehealth access, interstate barriers still exist.</p>","PeriodicalId":54434,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine and e-Health","volume":" ","pages":"1096-1105"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine and e-Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2025.0089","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: State professional licensure has been cited as a significant barrier to widespread telehealth adoption, and states have developed strategies to reduce such licensure burdens through policy changes. We aimed to measure the association between state-level medical licensure policies and outpatient telehealth utilization between 2018 and 2022 among Medicare beneficiaries. Methods: We conducted a quasi-experimental study of a 5% sample of age-qualifying Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries between January 2018 and December 2022. We assessed state-level medical licensure policy for telehealth visits, captured as participation in Interstate Medical Licensure Compact (IMLC) before the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE) and/or policy relaxation during the COVID-19 PHE. Outcomes included out-of-state telehealth (OOS-TH) and in-state telehealth (IS-TH). We evaluated the association between state-level policies and outcomes through logistic regression, adjusting for patient-level characteristics and month/year of the encounter. Results: We analyzed 141,199,029 outpatient encounters for 1,682,501 Medicare beneficiaries. In the pre-COVID-19 era, IMLC participation was associated with higher OOS-TH (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.24; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.09-2.40) but not IS-TH (aOR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.96-1.01). In the COVID-19 era, we observed higher IS-TH in IMLC-only states (aOR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.08-1.10) and states with COVID-19 policy relaxations (aOR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.10-1.12). We observed lower OOS-TH utilization by IMLC participation (aOR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.72-0.75) and COVID-19 policy relaxations (aOR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.81-0.85). Conclusions: Permissive licensure policies were higher telehealth utilization, though we observed mixed effects in telehealth type (IS-TH vs. OOS-TH) and by time (pre-COVID-19 vs. COVID-19). Variability in IS-TH and OOS-TH utilization may indicate that while local policies can improve telehealth access, interstate barriers still exist.

允许远程医疗状态许可策略与远程医疗利用率的增加相关联。
背景:国家专业执照被认为是远程医疗广泛采用的一个重大障碍,各州已制定战略,通过政策变化来减少这种执照负担。我们的目的是衡量2018年至2022年医疗保险受益人中国家级医疗执照政策与门诊远程医疗利用之间的关系。方法:我们在2018年1月至2022年12月期间对5%符合年龄的医疗保险服务收费受益人进行了准实验研究。我们评估了州一级远程医疗访问的医疗许可政策,这些政策是在COVID-19突发公共卫生事件(PHE)之前和/或COVID-19突发公共卫生事件期间政策放松时参与州际医疗许可契约(IMLC)获得的。结果包括州外远程医疗(OOS-TH)和州内远程医疗(IS-TH)。我们通过逻辑回归评估了州级政策与结果之间的关系,调整了患者水平特征和遭遇的月份/年份。结果:我们分析了1,682,501名医疗保险受益人的141,199,029次门诊就诊。在covid -19前,IMLC参与与较高的OOS-TH相关(调整优势比[aOR]: 2.24;95%可信区间[CI]: 2.09-2.40),但IS-TH没有(aOR: 0.98;95% ci: 0.96-1.01)。在COVID-19时代,我们观察到仅imlc州的IS-TH较高(aOR: 1.09;95% CI: 1.08-1.10)和COVID-19政策放松的州(aOR: 1.11;95% ci: 1.10-1.12)。我们观察到,IMLC参与降低了OOS-TH利用率(aOR: 0.74;95% CI: 0.72-0.75)和COVID-19政策放松(aOR: 0.83;95% ci: 0.81-0.85)。结论:尽管我们观察到远程医疗类型(IS-TH vs. OOS-TH)和时间(COVID-19前vs. COVID-19)的混合效应,但宽松的许可政策提高了远程医疗的利用率。IS-TH和OOS-TH利用的差异可能表明,虽然地方政策可以改善远程医疗服务,但州际障碍仍然存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Telemedicine and e-Health
Telemedicine and e-Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
6.40%
发文量
270
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Telemedicine and e-Health is the leading peer-reviewed journal for cutting-edge telemedicine applications for achieving optimal patient care and outcomes. It places special emphasis on the impact of telemedicine on the quality, cost effectiveness, and access to healthcare. Telemedicine applications play an increasingly important role in health care. They offer indispensable tools for home healthcare, remote patient monitoring, and disease management, not only for rural health and battlefield care, but also for nursing home, assisted living facilities, and maritime and aviation settings. Telemedicine and e-Health offers timely coverage of the advances in technology that offer practitioners, medical centers, and hospitals new and innovative options for managing patient care, electronic records, and medical billing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信