Priyanka Vakkalanka, Tracy Young, Knute D Carter, Fred Ullrich, Marcia M Ward, Nicholas M Mohr
{"title":"Permissive Telehealth State Licensure Policies Are Associated with Increased Telehealth Utilization.","authors":"Priyanka Vakkalanka, Tracy Young, Knute D Carter, Fred Ullrich, Marcia M Ward, Nicholas M Mohr","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2025.0089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> State professional licensure has been cited as a significant barrier to widespread telehealth adoption, and states have developed strategies to reduce such licensure burdens through policy changes. We aimed to measure the association between state-level medical licensure policies and outpatient telehealth utilization between 2018 and 2022 among Medicare beneficiaries. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a quasi-experimental study of a 5% sample of age-qualifying Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries between January 2018 and December 2022. We assessed state-level medical licensure policy for telehealth visits, captured as participation in Interstate Medical Licensure Compact (IMLC) before the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE) and/or policy relaxation during the COVID-19 PHE. Outcomes included out-of-state telehealth (OOS-TH) and in-state telehealth (IS-TH). We evaluated the association between state-level policies and outcomes through logistic regression, adjusting for patient-level characteristics and month/year of the encounter. <b>Results:</b> We analyzed 141,199,029 outpatient encounters for 1,682,501 Medicare beneficiaries. In the pre-COVID-19 era, IMLC participation was associated with higher OOS-TH (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.24; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.09-2.40) but not IS-TH (aOR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.96-1.01). In the COVID-19 era, we observed higher IS-TH in IMLC-only states (aOR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.08-1.10) and states with COVID-19 policy relaxations (aOR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.10-1.12). We observed lower OOS-TH utilization by IMLC participation (aOR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.72-0.75) and COVID-19 policy relaxations (aOR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.81-0.85). <b>Conclusions:</b> Permissive licensure policies were higher telehealth utilization, though we observed mixed effects in telehealth type (IS-TH vs. OOS-TH) and by time (pre-COVID-19 vs. COVID-19). Variability in IS-TH and OOS-TH utilization may indicate that while local policies can improve telehealth access, interstate barriers still exist.</p>","PeriodicalId":54434,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine and e-Health","volume":" ","pages":"1096-1105"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine and e-Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2025.0089","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: State professional licensure has been cited as a significant barrier to widespread telehealth adoption, and states have developed strategies to reduce such licensure burdens through policy changes. We aimed to measure the association between state-level medical licensure policies and outpatient telehealth utilization between 2018 and 2022 among Medicare beneficiaries. Methods: We conducted a quasi-experimental study of a 5% sample of age-qualifying Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries between January 2018 and December 2022. We assessed state-level medical licensure policy for telehealth visits, captured as participation in Interstate Medical Licensure Compact (IMLC) before the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE) and/or policy relaxation during the COVID-19 PHE. Outcomes included out-of-state telehealth (OOS-TH) and in-state telehealth (IS-TH). We evaluated the association between state-level policies and outcomes through logistic regression, adjusting for patient-level characteristics and month/year of the encounter. Results: We analyzed 141,199,029 outpatient encounters for 1,682,501 Medicare beneficiaries. In the pre-COVID-19 era, IMLC participation was associated with higher OOS-TH (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.24; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.09-2.40) but not IS-TH (aOR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.96-1.01). In the COVID-19 era, we observed higher IS-TH in IMLC-only states (aOR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.08-1.10) and states with COVID-19 policy relaxations (aOR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.10-1.12). We observed lower OOS-TH utilization by IMLC participation (aOR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.72-0.75) and COVID-19 policy relaxations (aOR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.81-0.85). Conclusions: Permissive licensure policies were higher telehealth utilization, though we observed mixed effects in telehealth type (IS-TH vs. OOS-TH) and by time (pre-COVID-19 vs. COVID-19). Variability in IS-TH and OOS-TH utilization may indicate that while local policies can improve telehealth access, interstate barriers still exist.
期刊介绍:
Telemedicine and e-Health is the leading peer-reviewed journal for cutting-edge telemedicine applications for achieving optimal patient care and outcomes. It places special emphasis on the impact of telemedicine on the quality, cost effectiveness, and access to healthcare. Telemedicine applications play an increasingly important role in health care. They offer indispensable tools for home healthcare, remote patient monitoring, and disease management, not only for rural health and battlefield care, but also for nursing home, assisted living facilities, and maritime and aviation settings.
Telemedicine and e-Health offers timely coverage of the advances in technology that offer practitioners, medical centers, and hospitals new and innovative options for managing patient care, electronic records, and medical billing.