Barriers and facilitators to implementing nature prescriptions for child and youth health: a scoping review.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Sophie Paquet, Nicole A Struthers, Anna Gunz, Lesley Gittings
{"title":"Barriers and facilitators to implementing nature prescriptions for child and youth health: a scoping review.","authors":"Sophie Paquet, Nicole A Struthers, Anna Gunz, Lesley Gittings","doi":"10.1093/heapro/daaf039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spending time in and connecting with nature has been shown to have positive benefits across multiple health outcomes, including for children and youth. Growing in popularity, nature prescriptions are recommended by health providers, social providers, and educators to spend more time in nature. The health and well-being benefits from nature prescription programs hold great potential for children and youth. However, a key evidence gap remains on how nature prescriptions occur in practice in pediatric healthcare, social care, and education, including barriers and facilitators to the implementation of nature prescription programs. The purpose of this scoping review was to explore the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of nature prescription programs for child and youth health. Peer-reviewed, original studies published in English were systematically searched in six databases using search terms focusing on nature prescriptions and child and youth health. Following the recommendations of Arksey and O'Malley (2005), two reviewers independently screened 2111 titles and abstracts, 38 records were screened in full text, and 10 studies were included. Thematic analysis was conducted following Braun and Clarke's (2022) guidelines. Three themes were developed from thematic analysis: (i) safety considerations, (ii) materials, resources, and support, and (iii) program features. The results of this review can be used to guide future nature prescription program implementation strategies for child and youth health.</p>","PeriodicalId":54256,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion International","volume":"40 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11983687/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaf039","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spending time in and connecting with nature has been shown to have positive benefits across multiple health outcomes, including for children and youth. Growing in popularity, nature prescriptions are recommended by health providers, social providers, and educators to spend more time in nature. The health and well-being benefits from nature prescription programs hold great potential for children and youth. However, a key evidence gap remains on how nature prescriptions occur in practice in pediatric healthcare, social care, and education, including barriers and facilitators to the implementation of nature prescription programs. The purpose of this scoping review was to explore the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of nature prescription programs for child and youth health. Peer-reviewed, original studies published in English were systematically searched in six databases using search terms focusing on nature prescriptions and child and youth health. Following the recommendations of Arksey and O'Malley (2005), two reviewers independently screened 2111 titles and abstracts, 38 records were screened in full text, and 10 studies were included. Thematic analysis was conducted following Braun and Clarke's (2022) guidelines. Three themes were developed from thematic analysis: (i) safety considerations, (ii) materials, resources, and support, and (iii) program features. The results of this review can be used to guide future nature prescription program implementation strategies for child and youth health.

实施儿童和青年健康自然处方的障碍和促进因素:范围审查。
花时间接触大自然并与大自然接触已被证明对多种健康结果都有积极的好处,包括对儿童和青少年。越来越受欢迎的是,健康提供者、社会提供者和教育工作者建议人们花更多的时间在大自然中。从自然处方项目中获得的健康和福祉对儿童和青少年具有巨大的潜力。然而,关于自然处方在儿科保健、社会保健和教育实践中如何发生,包括实施自然处方计划的障碍和促进因素,仍然存在关键的证据差距。本综述的目的是探讨儿童和青少年健康自然处方项目实施的障碍和促进因素。用英文发表的同行评审的原始研究在六个数据库中系统地检索,检索词集中在自然处方和儿童和青少年健康方面。根据Arksey和O'Malley(2005)的建议,两位审稿人独立筛选了2111篇标题和摘要,筛选了38条记录的全文,并纳入了10项研究。主题分析是按照Braun和Clarke(2022)的指导方针进行的。从专题分析中发展出三个主题:(1)安全考虑;(2)材料、资源和支持;(3)项目特点。本综述的结果可用于指导未来儿童和青少年健康自然处方规划的实施策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Promotion International
Health Promotion International Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: Health Promotion International contains refereed original articles, reviews, and debate articles on major themes and innovations in the health promotion field. In line with the remits of the series of global conferences on health promotion the journal expressly invites contributions from sectors beyond health. These may include education, employment, government, the media, industry, environmental agencies, and community networks. As the thought journal of the international health promotion movement we seek in particular theoretical, methodological and activist advances to the field. Thus, the journal provides a unique focal point for articles of high quality that describe not only theories and concepts, research projects and policy formulation, but also planned and spontaneous activities, organizational change, as well as social and environmental development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信