Association between adherence to the Food Guide golden rule and health characteristics among adult Brazilian women: a cross-sectional study with VIGITEL data, 2018-2021.

IF 2 Q1 Multidisciplinary
Epidemiologia e Servicos de Saude Pub Date : 2025-04-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/S2237-96222025v34e20240232.en
Ana Luiza de Souza Almeida, Taciana Maia de Sousa, Thais Cristina Marquezine Caldeira, Rafael Moreira Claro
{"title":"Association between adherence to the Food Guide golden rule and health characteristics among adult Brazilian women: a cross-sectional study with VIGITEL data, 2018-2021.","authors":"Ana Luiza de Souza Almeida, Taciana Maia de Sousa, Thais Cristina Marquezine Caldeira, Rafael Moreira Claro","doi":"10.1590/S2237-96222025v34e20240232.en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess association of adherence to the golden rule of the Food Guide for the Brazilian Population with health characteristics among adult women according to sociodemographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a cross-sectional study with 102,057 women interviewed by the Chronic Disease Risk and Protective Factors Surveillance Telephone Survey System in the Brazilian state capital cities and Federal District between 2018 and 2021. Outcome variables included obesity, hypertension, diabetes, depression and negative self-rated health. Adherence to the golden rule was rated by scores (-13 to +12 points) that combined the consumption of ultra-processed foods (negative) and fresh and minimally processed foods (positive). This score was categorized according to consumption tertiles, with low adherence (first tertile), moderate adherence (second tertile) and high adherence (third tertile). Logistic regression was used to calculate the adjusted odds ratios (OR) (by sociodemographic variables) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) of the outcomes in relation to adherence to the Guide.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to low adherence, moderate adherence was inversely associated with obesity (OR 0.86; 95%CI 0.78; 0.93) and negative self-rated health (OR 0.72; 95%CI 0.62; 0.84). High adherence was inversely associated with obesity (OR 0.72; 95%CI 0.65; 0.79), hypertension (OR 0.85; 95%CI 0.78; 0.93), depression (OR 0.69; 95%CI 0.59; 0.82) and negative self-rated health (OR 0.55; 95%CI 0.45; 0.67).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adherence to the Guide's golden rule was inversely associated with chronic diseases and negative self-rated health among adult Brazilian women.</p>","PeriodicalId":51473,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiologia e Servicos de Saude","volume":"34 ","pages":"e20240232"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11998651/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiologia e Servicos de Saude","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S2237-96222025v34e20240232.en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess association of adherence to the golden rule of the Food Guide for the Brazilian Population with health characteristics among adult women according to sociodemographic characteristics.

Methods: This is a cross-sectional study with 102,057 women interviewed by the Chronic Disease Risk and Protective Factors Surveillance Telephone Survey System in the Brazilian state capital cities and Federal District between 2018 and 2021. Outcome variables included obesity, hypertension, diabetes, depression and negative self-rated health. Adherence to the golden rule was rated by scores (-13 to +12 points) that combined the consumption of ultra-processed foods (negative) and fresh and minimally processed foods (positive). This score was categorized according to consumption tertiles, with low adherence (first tertile), moderate adherence (second tertile) and high adherence (third tertile). Logistic regression was used to calculate the adjusted odds ratios (OR) (by sociodemographic variables) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) of the outcomes in relation to adherence to the Guide.

Results: Compared to low adherence, moderate adherence was inversely associated with obesity (OR 0.86; 95%CI 0.78; 0.93) and negative self-rated health (OR 0.72; 95%CI 0.62; 0.84). High adherence was inversely associated with obesity (OR 0.72; 95%CI 0.65; 0.79), hypertension (OR 0.85; 95%CI 0.78; 0.93), depression (OR 0.69; 95%CI 0.59; 0.82) and negative self-rated health (OR 0.55; 95%CI 0.45; 0.67).

Conclusion: Adherence to the Guide's golden rule was inversely associated with chronic diseases and negative self-rated health among adult Brazilian women.

巴西成年女性遵守《食物指南》黄金法则与健康特征之间的关系:2018-2021年VIGITEL数据的横断面研究
目的:根据社会人口特征,评估成年妇女遵守《巴西人口食物指南》黄金法则与健康特征之间的关系。方法:这是一项横断面研究,2018年至2021年期间,巴西州首府城市和联邦区的102,057名妇女接受了慢性病风险和保护因素监测电话调查系统的采访。结果变量包括肥胖、高血压、糖尿病、抑郁和消极的自我评价健康。对黄金法则的遵守程度评分为-13到+12分,综合了超加工食品(负面)和新鲜和最低加工食品(正面)的消费。这个分数是根据消费百分位数分类的,低坚持(第一百分位数),中等坚持(第二百分位数)和高坚持(第三百分位数)。采用Logistic回归计算(通过社会人口学变量)校正优势比(OR)和与指南依从性相关的结果的95%置信区间(95% ci)。结果:与低依从性相比,中等依从性与肥胖呈负相关(OR 0.86;95%可信区间0.78;0.93)和消极的自评健康(OR 0.72;95%可信区间0.62;0.84)。高依从性与肥胖呈负相关(OR 0.72;95%可信区间0.65;0.79),高血压(OR 0.85;95%可信区间0.78;0.93),抑郁(OR 0.69;95%可信区间0.59;0.82)和消极的自评健康(OR 0.55;95%可信区间0.45;0.67)。结论:在巴西成年妇女中,遵守《指南》黄金法则与慢性疾病和消极自我评价健康呈负相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epidemiologia e Servicos de Saude
Epidemiologia e Servicos de Saude PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信