A Train-the-Trainer Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) Program for Pediatric Pneumonia in a Low-Resource Setting.

POCUS journal Pub Date : 2025-04-15 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.24908/pocusj.v10i01.18285
Michelle S Lee, Fatima Mir, Amerta Ladhani, Huba Atiq, Shaun K Morris, Mark O Tessaro
{"title":"A Train-the-Trainer Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) Program for Pediatric Pneumonia in a Low-Resource Setting.","authors":"Michelle S Lee, Fatima Mir, Amerta Ladhani, Huba Atiq, Shaun K Morris, Mark O Tessaro","doi":"10.24908/pocusj.v10i01.18285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lung point of care ultrasound (POCUS) has the potential to transform pediatric pneumonia care in low resource settings. Prior studies of novice POCUS users in such settings showed high agreement with remote POCUS experts for diagnosing pediatric pneumonia, but use of remote experts may falsely inflate this agreement.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to 1. Deliver a train-the-trainer program in Pakistan on lung POCUS for diagnosing pediatric pneumonia; 2. Determine inter-rater reliability between i) study-trained community health workers (CHWs) and a remote expert, with both interpreting POCUS examinations acquired by the CHWs, and ii) study-trained CHWs and local champions, with both interpreting examinations that they had acquired.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Phase 1: Canadian pediatric POCUS experts developed and delivered a lung POCUS training program for two user groups in Pakistan. These groups included local champions (who had POCUS experience) and CHWs (who were POCUS novices). Phase 2: Children with suspected pneumonia underwent two lung POCUS examinations, one by a CHW and one by a local champion. Examinations were recorded and later reviewed by a remote expert for interpretation and quality assurance. Inter-rater reliability was determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two local champions and three CHWs were successfully trained. An analysis of 231 recruited patients showed strong inter-rater reliability between study-trained CHWs and remote expert interpretations (κ = 0.83). In contrast, inter-rater reliability was moderate (κ = 0.66) between interpretations by novices and local champions when these users interpreted the examinations that they themselves had acquired.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study showed that train-the-trainer programs are feasible and can be effective, while highlighting the importance of hands-on training and having local champions provide longitudinal support to novices.</p>","PeriodicalId":74470,"journal":{"name":"POCUS journal","volume":"10 1","pages":"157-163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12057474/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POCUS journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24908/pocusj.v10i01.18285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lung point of care ultrasound (POCUS) has the potential to transform pediatric pneumonia care in low resource settings. Prior studies of novice POCUS users in such settings showed high agreement with remote POCUS experts for diagnosing pediatric pneumonia, but use of remote experts may falsely inflate this agreement.

Objectives: This study aimed to 1. Deliver a train-the-trainer program in Pakistan on lung POCUS for diagnosing pediatric pneumonia; 2. Determine inter-rater reliability between i) study-trained community health workers (CHWs) and a remote expert, with both interpreting POCUS examinations acquired by the CHWs, and ii) study-trained CHWs and local champions, with both interpreting examinations that they had acquired.

Methods: Phase 1: Canadian pediatric POCUS experts developed and delivered a lung POCUS training program for two user groups in Pakistan. These groups included local champions (who had POCUS experience) and CHWs (who were POCUS novices). Phase 2: Children with suspected pneumonia underwent two lung POCUS examinations, one by a CHW and one by a local champion. Examinations were recorded and later reviewed by a remote expert for interpretation and quality assurance. Inter-rater reliability was determined.

Results: Two local champions and three CHWs were successfully trained. An analysis of 231 recruited patients showed strong inter-rater reliability between study-trained CHWs and remote expert interpretations (κ = 0.83). In contrast, inter-rater reliability was moderate (κ = 0.66) between interpretations by novices and local champions when these users interpreted the examinations that they themselves had acquired.

Conclusion: Our study showed that train-the-trainer programs are feasible and can be effective, while highlighting the importance of hands-on training and having local champions provide longitudinal support to novices.

低资源环境下儿童肺炎护理超声点培训(POCUS)项目。
背景:肺部护理点超声(POCUS)有可能改变低资源环境下的儿科肺炎护理。先前的研究表明,在这种情况下,POCUS新手用户与远程POCUS专家诊断儿科肺炎的一致性很高,但使用远程专家可能会错误地夸大这一一致性。目的:本研究旨在1。在巴基斯坦开展关于肺部POCUS诊断儿科肺炎的培训师培训计划;2. 确定i)经过研究培训的社区卫生工作者(chw)和远程专家(chw获得了POCUS口译考试)以及ii)经过研究培训的社区卫生工作者和当地冠军(他们获得了两次口译考试)之间的评分间信度。方法:第一阶段:加拿大儿科POCUS专家为巴基斯坦的两个用户群体制定并实施了肺部POCUS培训计划。这些小组包括当地冠军(有POCUS经验)和chw (POCUS新手)。第二阶段:怀疑肺炎的儿童接受两次肺部POCUS检查,一次由CHW进行,另一次由当地冠军进行。检查记录下来,然后由远程专家进行审查,以便口译和质量保证。评估者间信度。结果:成功培养了2名地方冠军和3名卫生保健员。对231名招募患者的分析显示,在研究训练的chw和远程专家解释之间存在很强的评分间信度(κ = 0.83)。相比之下,当这些用户解释他们自己获得的考试时,新手和当地冠军的解释之间的等级间信度是中等的(κ = 0.66)。结论:我们的研究表明,培训师计划是可行和有效的,同时强调了实践培训和让当地冠军为新手提供纵向支持的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信