Overall Survival Analysis of the Phase III CodeBreaK 300 Study of Sotorasib Plus Panitumumab Versus Investigator's Choice in Chemorefractory KRAS G12C Colorectal Cancer.

IF 42.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Filippo Pietrantonio, Lisa Salvatore, Taito Esaki, Dominik Paul Modest, David Paez Lopez-Bravo, Julien Taieb, Michalis V Karamouzis, Erika Ruiz-Garcia, Tae Won Kim, Yasutoshi Kuboki, Fausto Meriggi, David Cunningham, Kun-Huei Yeh, Emily Chan, Joseph Chao, Qui Tran, Chiara Cremolini, Marwan Fakih
{"title":"Overall Survival Analysis of the Phase III CodeBreaK 300 Study of Sotorasib Plus Panitumumab Versus Investigator's Choice in Chemorefractory <i>KRAS</i> G12C Colorectal Cancer.","authors":"Filippo Pietrantonio, Lisa Salvatore, Taito Esaki, Dominik Paul Modest, David Paez Lopez-Bravo, Julien Taieb, Michalis V Karamouzis, Erika Ruiz-Garcia, Tae Won Kim, Yasutoshi Kuboki, Fausto Meriggi, David Cunningham, Kun-Huei Yeh, Emily Chan, Joseph Chao, Qui Tran, Chiara Cremolini, Marwan Fakih","doi":"10.1200/JCO-24-02026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the phase III CodeBreaK 300 study, sotorasib 960 mg-panitumumab significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) versus investigator's choice (trifluridine/tipiracil or regorafenib) in patients with <i>KRAS</i> G12C-mutated chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). One hundred sixty patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive sotorasib 960 mg-panitumumab (n = 53), sotorasib 240 mg-panitumumab (n = 53), or investigator's choice (n = 54; crossover permitted after primary analysis). Overall survival (OS) analysis, a key secondary end point, although not adequately powered, was prespecified at 50% maturity (after approximately 80 deaths). In this study, we report the OS, updated overall response rates (ORRs), and data for safety. After a median follow-up of 13.6 months, 24, 28, and 30 deaths occurred in the sotorasib 960 mg-panitumumab, sotorasib 240 mg-panitumumab, and investigator's choice arms, respectively; updated objective response rates (ORRs; 95% CI) were 30.2% (95% CI, 18.3 to 44.3), 7.5% (95% CI, 2.1 to 18.2), and 1.9% (95% CI, 0.0 to 9.9), respectively. Compared with investigator's choice, the hazard ratios (HRs [95% CI]) for OS were 0.70 (95% CI, 0.41 to 1.18; two-sided <i>P</i> = .20) with sotorasib 960 mg-panitumumab and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.49 to 1.39; two-sided <i>P</i> = .50) with sotorasib 240 mg-panitumumab. No new safety signals were observed. Although not statistically significant, the observed OS HR and ORR along with prior PFS and safety findings support sotorasib 960 mg-panitumumab as a standard of care in patients with chemorefractory <i>KRAS</i> G12C mCRC.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"JCO2402026"},"PeriodicalIF":42.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-24-02026","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the phase III CodeBreaK 300 study, sotorasib 960 mg-panitumumab significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) versus investigator's choice (trifluridine/tipiracil or regorafenib) in patients with KRAS G12C-mutated chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). One hundred sixty patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive sotorasib 960 mg-panitumumab (n = 53), sotorasib 240 mg-panitumumab (n = 53), or investigator's choice (n = 54; crossover permitted after primary analysis). Overall survival (OS) analysis, a key secondary end point, although not adequately powered, was prespecified at 50% maturity (after approximately 80 deaths). In this study, we report the OS, updated overall response rates (ORRs), and data for safety. After a median follow-up of 13.6 months, 24, 28, and 30 deaths occurred in the sotorasib 960 mg-panitumumab, sotorasib 240 mg-panitumumab, and investigator's choice arms, respectively; updated objective response rates (ORRs; 95% CI) were 30.2% (95% CI, 18.3 to 44.3), 7.5% (95% CI, 2.1 to 18.2), and 1.9% (95% CI, 0.0 to 9.9), respectively. Compared with investigator's choice, the hazard ratios (HRs [95% CI]) for OS were 0.70 (95% CI, 0.41 to 1.18; two-sided P = .20) with sotorasib 960 mg-panitumumab and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.49 to 1.39; two-sided P = .50) with sotorasib 240 mg-panitumumab. No new safety signals were observed. Although not statistically significant, the observed OS HR and ORR along with prior PFS and safety findings support sotorasib 960 mg-panitumumab as a standard of care in patients with chemorefractory KRAS G12C mCRC.

Sotorasib + Panitumumab与研究者选择化疗难治KRAS G12C结直肠癌的III期CodeBreaK 300研究的总生存分析
在III期CodeBreaK 300研究中,与研究者的选择(trifluridine/tipiracil或regorafenib)相比,sotorasib 960 mg-panitumumab显著延长了KRAS g12c突变的化疗难治性转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者的无进展生存期(PFS)。160例患者以1:1:1的比例随机分配,接受sotorasib 960 mg-panitumumab (n = 53)、sotorasib 240 mg-panitumumab (n = 53)或研究者选择(n = 54;初步分析后允许交叉)。总生存期(OS)分析是一个关键的次要终点,虽然没有充分的支持,但在50%的成熟度(大约80例死亡后)预先指定。在这项研究中,我们报告了OS,更新的总体反应率(orr)和安全性数据。中位随访13.6个月后,sotorasib 960 mg-panitumumab组、sotorasib 240 mg-panitumumab组和研究者选择组分别发生了24、28和30例死亡;更新客观反应率(orr);95% CI)分别为30.2% (95% CI, 18.3 ~ 44.3)、7.5% (95% CI, 2.1 ~ 18.2)和1.9% (95% CI, 0.0 ~ 9.9)。与研究者的选择相比,OS的风险比(hr [95% CI])为0.70 (95% CI, 0.41 ~ 1.18;双侧P = 0.20), sotorasib 960 mg-panitumumab和0.83 (95% CI, 0.49至1.39;双侧P = 0.50), sotorasib 240 mg-panitumumab。没有观察到新的安全信号。虽然没有统计学意义,但观察到的OS HR和ORR以及先前的PFS和安全性研究结果支持sotorasib 960 mg-panitumumab作为化疗难治性KRAS G12C mCRC患者的标准治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Journal of Clinical Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
41.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
8215
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Oncology serves its readers as the single most credible, authoritative resource for disseminating significant clinical oncology research. In print and in electronic format, JCO strives to publish the highest quality articles dedicated to clinical research. Original Reports remain the focus of JCO, but this scientific communication is enhanced by appropriately selected Editorials, Commentaries, Reviews, and other work that relate to the care of patients with cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信