Adverse Reactions Following First-Dose Administration of Co-Crystal of Tramadol-Celecoxib Versus Tramadol Alone for Moderate-To-Severe Acute Pain.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Pain and Therapy Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-02 DOI:10.1007/s40122-025-00730-w
Adelaida Morte, Mariano Sust, Anna Vaqué, Jesús Cebrecos, José María Giménez-Arnau
{"title":"Adverse Reactions Following First-Dose Administration of Co-Crystal of Tramadol-Celecoxib Versus Tramadol Alone for Moderate-To-Severe Acute Pain.","authors":"Adelaida Morte, Mariano Sust, Anna Vaqué, Jesús Cebrecos, José María Giménez-Arnau","doi":"10.1007/s40122-025-00730-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Phase 3 clinical trials in moderate-to-severe acute pain have shown that co-crystal of tramadol-celecoxib (CTC) has improved efficacy and comparable tolerability versus immediate-release tramadol 50 mg alone, with a similar tramadol daily dose, over a 48-h treatment period. However, it is not known how first-dose tolerability compares, given that the administered dose of tramadol is higher in CTC 200 mg (88 mg) versus immediate-release tramadol 50 mg. This was explored in a post hoc analysis of a pivotal phase 3 trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized, double-blind, factorial, active- and placebo-controlled phase 3 trial was conducted in patients with moderate-to-severe acute postoperative pain (NCT03108482) and has been previously reported. This post hoc analysis evaluated the prevalence of the four most common study drug-related, opioid-associated, treatment-emergent adverse reactions reported in phase 3 CTC clinical trials: somnolence, nausea, dizziness, and vomiting. Prevalence was evaluated in 2-h intervals, up to 6 h post first dose (just before second-dose administration) of CTC 200 mg or immediate-release tramadol 50 mg p.o. Descriptive analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Each group comprised 183 participants for analysis. The proportions of patients reporting drug-related, treatment-emergent adverse reactions of somnolence, nausea, dizziness, and vomiting were similar between treatment groups at 2, 4, and 6 h following the first dose.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This post hoc analysis indicates that the higher dose of tramadol (88 mg) given in CTC 200 mg did not result in an increase in drug-related adverse reactions after first-dose administration, and had a similar tolerability profile, compared with immediate-release tramadol 50 mg alone (the lowest dose recommended for the management of moderate-to-severe acute pain). This is in line with earlier findings for the 48-h treatment period of this phase 3 trial and may be explained by CTC's differentiated physiochemical properties related to its co-crystal structure. These findings may have utility for practicing clinicians.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03108482.</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1147-1154"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12085740/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-025-00730-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Phase 3 clinical trials in moderate-to-severe acute pain have shown that co-crystal of tramadol-celecoxib (CTC) has improved efficacy and comparable tolerability versus immediate-release tramadol 50 mg alone, with a similar tramadol daily dose, over a 48-h treatment period. However, it is not known how first-dose tolerability compares, given that the administered dose of tramadol is higher in CTC 200 mg (88 mg) versus immediate-release tramadol 50 mg. This was explored in a post hoc analysis of a pivotal phase 3 trial.

Methods: A randomized, double-blind, factorial, active- and placebo-controlled phase 3 trial was conducted in patients with moderate-to-severe acute postoperative pain (NCT03108482) and has been previously reported. This post hoc analysis evaluated the prevalence of the four most common study drug-related, opioid-associated, treatment-emergent adverse reactions reported in phase 3 CTC clinical trials: somnolence, nausea, dizziness, and vomiting. Prevalence was evaluated in 2-h intervals, up to 6 h post first dose (just before second-dose administration) of CTC 200 mg or immediate-release tramadol 50 mg p.o. Descriptive analysis was performed.

Results: Each group comprised 183 participants for analysis. The proportions of patients reporting drug-related, treatment-emergent adverse reactions of somnolence, nausea, dizziness, and vomiting were similar between treatment groups at 2, 4, and 6 h following the first dose.

Conclusions: This post hoc analysis indicates that the higher dose of tramadol (88 mg) given in CTC 200 mg did not result in an increase in drug-related adverse reactions after first-dose administration, and had a similar tolerability profile, compared with immediate-release tramadol 50 mg alone (the lowest dose recommended for the management of moderate-to-severe acute pain). This is in line with earlier findings for the 48-h treatment period of this phase 3 trial and may be explained by CTC's differentiated physiochemical properties related to its co-crystal structure. These findings may have utility for practicing clinicians.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03108482.

首次给药曲马多-塞来昔布共晶与单独曲马多治疗中重度急性疼痛的不良反应。
导读:治疗中重度急性疼痛的3期临床试验表明,曲马多-塞来昔布(CTC)共晶在48小时的治疗期内,与曲马多单用50 mg速释曲马多相比,疗效更好,耐受性相当。曲马多日剂量相似。然而,考虑到曲马多在CTC中给药剂量200mg (88mg)高于速释曲马多50mg,尚不清楚如何比较首次给药耐受性。这在一项关键的3期试验的事后分析中得到了探讨。方法:一项随机,双盲,因子,主动和安慰剂对照的3期试验在中重度急性术后疼痛患者(NCT03108482)中进行,并已报道。本事后分析评估了CTC三期临床试验中报告的四种最常见的药物相关、阿片类药物相关、治疗中出现的不良反应的发生率:嗜睡、恶心、头晕和呕吐。每隔2小时评估一次CTC 200mg或曲马多50mg p.o给药后6小时(第二次给药前)的患病率。进行描述性分析。结果:每组183人进行分析。在第一次给药后2、4和6小时,两组患者报告药物相关、治疗引起的嗜睡、恶心、头晕和呕吐不良反应的比例相似。结论:该事后分析表明,CTC 200mg中较高剂量的曲马多(88 mg)在首次给药后不会导致药物相关不良反应的增加,并且与单独速释曲马多50mg(推荐用于治疗中至重度急性疼痛的最低剂量)相比,具有相似的耐受性。这与前期三期试验48小时处理期的研究结果一致,可能是由于CTC与其共晶结构相关的不同理化性质。这些发现可能对临床医生有实用价值。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov识别码,NCT03108482。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain and Therapy
Pain and Therapy CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
110
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of pain therapies and pain-related devices. Studies relating to diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. Areas of focus include, but are not limited to, acute pain, cancer pain, chronic pain, headache and migraine, neuropathic pain, opioids, palliative care and pain ethics, peri- and post-operative pain as well as rheumatic pain and fibromyalgia. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of pharmaceutical and healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, case reports, trial protocols, short communications such as commentaries and editorials, and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from around the world. Pain and Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信