Evaluation of dried blood spot sampling for verification of exposure to chemical threat agents.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
Katie A Walker, Trinity K Rudd, Justin N Vignola, Thomas M McClymont, Noah D Roberts, Kevin Laitipaya, Robert C diTargiani
{"title":"Evaluation of dried blood spot sampling for verification of exposure to chemical threat agents.","authors":"Katie A Walker, Trinity K Rudd, Justin N Vignola, Thomas M McClymont, Noah D Roberts, Kevin Laitipaya, Robert C diTargiani","doi":"10.1007/s11419-025-00721-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Exposure to chemical threat agents (CTAs), including nerve agents, the vesicating agent sulfur mustard, and opioids, remains a significant threat to warfighter and civilian populations. Definitive analytical methods to verify exposure to CTAs require shipping refrigerated or frozen biomedical samples to reference laboratories for analysis. Logistical and financial burdens arise as the transport of biomedical samples is subject to strict restrictions and complex packaging, which, if done incorrectly, can lead to sample deterioration. The use of dried blood spot (DBS) sampling could provide operational improvements for collecting, storing, and shipping important forensic samples. Therefore, this effort focuses on developing DBS techniques with Mitra® 30-µL volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS®) devices for use in CTA exposure verification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>VAMS® devices were loaded and dried with human whole blood that was exposed to the metabolites pinacolyl methylphosphonic acid (PMPA), ethyl methylphosphonic acid (EMPA), 1,1'sulfonylbis[2-(methylsulfinyl)ethane] (SBMSE), norfentanyl, norcarfentanil, norsufentanil, and norlofentanil. Following extraction from the VAMS® devices, metabolites were detected using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The methods were validated for performance by assessing sensitivity, precision, accuracy, and recovery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>These methods were sensitive to 1 ng/mL for SBMSE, 0.5 ng/mL for PMPA, EMPA, and norfentanyl; 0.1 ng/mL for norlofentanil, and 0.05 ng/mL for norsufentanil and norcarfentanil. All methods met acceptable precision and accuracy criteria with favorable recovery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results demonstrated the utility of VAMS® in stabilizing human whole blood and show promise as an improved collection method for verification of exposure to various CTAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12329,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11419-025-00721-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Exposure to chemical threat agents (CTAs), including nerve agents, the vesicating agent sulfur mustard, and opioids, remains a significant threat to warfighter and civilian populations. Definitive analytical methods to verify exposure to CTAs require shipping refrigerated or frozen biomedical samples to reference laboratories for analysis. Logistical and financial burdens arise as the transport of biomedical samples is subject to strict restrictions and complex packaging, which, if done incorrectly, can lead to sample deterioration. The use of dried blood spot (DBS) sampling could provide operational improvements for collecting, storing, and shipping important forensic samples. Therefore, this effort focuses on developing DBS techniques with Mitra® 30-µL volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS®) devices for use in CTA exposure verification.

Methods: VAMS® devices were loaded and dried with human whole blood that was exposed to the metabolites pinacolyl methylphosphonic acid (PMPA), ethyl methylphosphonic acid (EMPA), 1,1'sulfonylbis[2-(methylsulfinyl)ethane] (SBMSE), norfentanyl, norcarfentanil, norsufentanil, and norlofentanil. Following extraction from the VAMS® devices, metabolites were detected using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The methods were validated for performance by assessing sensitivity, precision, accuracy, and recovery.

Results: These methods were sensitive to 1 ng/mL for SBMSE, 0.5 ng/mL for PMPA, EMPA, and norfentanyl; 0.1 ng/mL for norlofentanil, and 0.05 ng/mL for norsufentanil and norcarfentanil. All methods met acceptable precision and accuracy criteria with favorable recovery.

Conclusions: These results demonstrated the utility of VAMS® in stabilizing human whole blood and show promise as an improved collection method for verification of exposure to various CTAs.

检验暴露于化学威胁剂的干血点取样的评价。
目的:暴露于化学威胁剂(cta),包括神经毒剂、起泡剂硫芥子气和阿片类药物,仍然是对作战人员和平民的重大威胁。验证cta暴露的最终分析方法需要将冷藏或冷冻的生物医学样品运送到参考实验室进行分析。由于生物医学样品的运输受到严格的限制和复杂的包装,因此产生了后勤和财政负担,如果处理不当,可能导致样品变质。使用干血斑(DBS)采样可以为收集、储存和运输重要的法医样本提供操作改进。因此,这项工作的重点是开发使用Mitra®30µL体积吸收微采样(VAMS®)设备的DBS技术,用于CTA暴露验证。方法:将暴露于代谢物pinacolyl methylphosphonic acid (PMPA)、ethyl methylphosphonic acid (EMPA)、1,1'sulfonylbis[2-(methylsulfinyl)乙烷](SBMSE)、norfentanyl、norcarfentanil、norsufentanil和norlofentanil的人全血装在VAMS®设备上并干燥。从VAMS®设备中提取后,使用液相色谱-串联质谱(LC-MS/MS)检测代谢物。通过评估灵敏度、精密度、准确度和回收率来验证方法的性能。结果:该方法对SBMSE 1 ng/mL、PMPA、EMPA、诺芬太尼0.5 ng/mL敏感;诺洛芬太尼0.1 ng/mL,去甲舒芬太尼和诺卡芬太尼0.05 ng/mL。所有方法的精密度和准确度均达到可接受的标准,回收率良好。结论:这些结果证明了VAMS®在稳定人类全血中的效用,并显示了作为验证各种cta暴露的改进收集方法的希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forensic Toxicology
Forensic Toxicology TOXICOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
40
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Forensic Toxicology provides an international forum for publication of studies on toxic substances, drugs of abuse, doping agents, chemical warfare agents, and their metabolisms and analyses, which are related to laws and ethics. It includes original articles, reviews, mini-reviews, short communications, and case reports. Although a major focus of the journal is on the development or improvement of analytical methods for the above-mentioned chemicals in human matrices, appropriate studies with animal experiments are also published. Forensic Toxicology is the official publication of the Japanese Association of Forensic Toxicology (JAFT) and is the continuation of the Japanese Journal of Forensic Toxicology (ISSN 0915-9606).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信