FACE-TO-FACE EXERCISES ARE NOT SUPERIOR TO TELE-REHABILITATION IN RECENT POST-OPERATIVE TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Acta Ortopedica Brasileira Pub Date : 2025-04-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1413-785220243201e278202
Mateus DE Col Brazeiro, Karen Fernanda Mueller, Camilla DA Silva Rohde, Bruna DE Moraes Lopes, Marcelo Faria Silva
{"title":"FACE-TO-FACE EXERCISES ARE NOT SUPERIOR TO TELE-REHABILITATION IN RECENT POST-OPERATIVE TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL.","authors":"Mateus DE Col Brazeiro, Karen Fernanda Mueller, Camilla DA Silva Rohde, Bruna DE Moraes Lopes, Marcelo Faria Silva","doi":"10.1590/1413-785220243201e278202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>compare a face-to-face exercise program (face-to-face group [FG]) to telerehabilitation (telerehabilitation group [TG]), in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA).</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>randomized clinical trial with 24 participants: 14 in the FG, which held weekly exercise sessions with face-to-face supervision in the clinic; and 10 in the TG, which performed exercises at home, with guidance from the booklet and weekly calls from the researchers. All participants underwent 6 weeks of intervention and were evaluated, by a blinded evaluator, in the pre- and post-intervention moments for: pain; kinesiophobia; functional; joint range of motion (ROM); and peak muscle torque (PT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>post-intervention only the TG (p = 0.018; d = 1,744) showed improvement in the results of the TUG, however both TG (p = 0.043; d = 1,876) and FG (p = 0.002; d = 1,854) showed improvement in the HHS results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>telerehabilitation proved to be as effective as face-to-face rehabilitation in improving PT, ROM and functional capacity of patients in the initial stage of THA rehabilitation. It can be considered a low-cost and easy access alternative in this post-operative phase. <b><i>Level of Evidence I, Randomized control trial.</i></b></p>","PeriodicalId":55563,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira","volume":"33 spe1","pages":"e278202"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11978312/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220243201e278202","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: compare a face-to-face exercise program (face-to-face group [FG]) to telerehabilitation (telerehabilitation group [TG]), in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methodology: randomized clinical trial with 24 participants: 14 in the FG, which held weekly exercise sessions with face-to-face supervision in the clinic; and 10 in the TG, which performed exercises at home, with guidance from the booklet and weekly calls from the researchers. All participants underwent 6 weeks of intervention and were evaluated, by a blinded evaluator, in the pre- and post-intervention moments for: pain; kinesiophobia; functional; joint range of motion (ROM); and peak muscle torque (PT).

Results: post-intervention only the TG (p = 0.018; d = 1,744) showed improvement in the results of the TUG, however both TG (p = 0.043; d = 1,876) and FG (p = 0.002; d = 1,854) showed improvement in the HHS results.

Conclusion: telerehabilitation proved to be as effective as face-to-face rehabilitation in improving PT, ROM and functional capacity of patients in the initial stage of THA rehabilitation. It can be considered a low-cost and easy access alternative in this post-operative phase. Level of Evidence I, Randomized control trial.

在最近的全髋关节置换术后,面对面练习并不优于远程康复:一项随机临床试验。
目的:比较全髋关节置换术(THA)患者面对面运动方案(面对面组[FG])与远程康复方案(远程康复组[TG])。方法:随机临床试验,共有24名参与者:14名在FG,每周在诊所面对面监督下进行锻炼;另外10人在TG组,在小册子的指导和研究人员每周的电话指导下,在家进行锻炼。所有参与者都进行了为期6周的干预,并由盲法评估者在干预前和干预后的时刻进行评估:疼痛;kinesiophobia;功能;关节活动范围(ROM);和峰值肌肉扭矩(PT)。结果:干预后仅TG (p = 0.018;d = 1,744)显示了TUG结果的改善,但TG (p = 0.043;d = 1876)和FG (p = 0.002;d = 1854)显示HHS结果有所改善。结论:在THA康复初期,远程康复与面对面康复在改善患者PT、ROM和功能能力方面具有同等效果。在这个术后阶段,它可以被认为是一种低成本和容易获得的替代方法。证据水平I,随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
67
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: A Revista Acta Ortopédica Brasileira, órgão oficial do Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (DOT/FMUSP), é publicada bimestralmente em seis edições ao ano (jan/fev, mar/abr, maio/jun, jul/ago, set/out e nov/dez) com versão em inglês disponível nos principais indexadores nacionais e internacionais e instituições de ensino do Brasil. Sendo hoje reconhecidamente uma importante contribuição para os especialistas da área com sua seriedade e árduo trabalho para as indexações já conquistadas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信