Pro-Vax, Anti-Vax, or Shades of Gray? Segmenting Consumers Based on Attitudes to Vaccination.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Davide Rigoni, Timothy Desmet, Malaika Brengman
{"title":"Pro-Vax, Anti-Vax, or Shades of Gray? Segmenting Consumers Based on Attitudes to Vaccination.","authors":"Davide Rigoni, Timothy Desmet, Malaika Brengman","doi":"10.1177/10901981251334105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vaccination hesitancy remains a prominent global health concern, as recognized by the World Health Organization (WHO). This quantitative study, conducted on a representative sample of the Belgian population (<i>n</i> = 1,030), explores consumer segmentation concerning vaccination attitudes during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021, identifying five distinct clusters. While 39.6% of the surveyed consumers broadly accepted the COVID-19 vaccine (Convinced Pro-Vaxxers), our analysis revealed that 17.1% were skeptical (Skeptics), 12.7% were fearful of the inoculation procedure (Fearful Doubters), and 7.1% were fully opposed to vaccination (Anti-Vaxxers). Nearly one in four participants (Indifferent Pro-Vaxxers) showed little interest in the pandemic yet remained largely favorable toward vaccination. The variation in cluster size, attitudes, beliefs, and sociodemographic traits highlights the complexity of vaccine hesitancy, indicating it is not a binary issue. These findings underscore the importance of tailored health communication and vaccination campaigns to address hesitancy and improve vaccine uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":12974,"journal":{"name":"Health Education & Behavior","volume":" ","pages":"10901981251334105"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Education & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10901981251334105","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vaccination hesitancy remains a prominent global health concern, as recognized by the World Health Organization (WHO). This quantitative study, conducted on a representative sample of the Belgian population (n = 1,030), explores consumer segmentation concerning vaccination attitudes during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021, identifying five distinct clusters. While 39.6% of the surveyed consumers broadly accepted the COVID-19 vaccine (Convinced Pro-Vaxxers), our analysis revealed that 17.1% were skeptical (Skeptics), 12.7% were fearful of the inoculation procedure (Fearful Doubters), and 7.1% were fully opposed to vaccination (Anti-Vaxxers). Nearly one in four participants (Indifferent Pro-Vaxxers) showed little interest in the pandemic yet remained largely favorable toward vaccination. The variation in cluster size, attitudes, beliefs, and sociodemographic traits highlights the complexity of vaccine hesitancy, indicating it is not a binary issue. These findings underscore the importance of tailored health communication and vaccination campaigns to address hesitancy and improve vaccine uptake.

支持疫苗接种,反对疫苗接种,还是灰色地带?根据对疫苗接种的态度对消费者进行细分。
正如世界卫生组织(世卫组织)所承认的那样,疫苗接种犹豫不决仍然是一个突出的全球卫生问题。这项定量研究对比利时人口的代表性样本(n = 1030)进行了研究,探讨了2021年COVID-19大流行期间消费者对疫苗接种态度的细分,确定了五个不同的群体。虽然39.6%的受访消费者广泛接受COVID-19疫苗(深信亲vaxxers),但我们的分析显示,17.1%的人持怀疑态度(怀疑者),12.7%的人害怕接种程序(恐惧怀疑者),7.1%的人完全反对接种疫苗(Anti-Vaxxers)。近四分之一的参与者(漠不关心的支持接种者)对大流行不感兴趣,但仍基本上赞成接种疫苗。群体大小、态度、信念和社会人口特征的差异突出了疫苗犹豫的复杂性,表明这不是一个二元问题。这些发现强调了有针对性的卫生宣传和疫苗接种运动的重要性,以解决犹豫不决和改善疫苗摄取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Education & Behavior
Health Education & Behavior PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Health Education & Behavior is the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education (SOPHE). The journal publishes authoritative and practical information on critical health issues for a broad range of professionals interested in understanding factors associated with health behavior and health status, and strategies to improve social and behavioral health. The journal is interested in articles directed toward researchers and/or practitioners in health behavior and health education. Empirical research, case study, program evaluation, literature reviews, and articles discussing theories are regularly published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信