A new human spine model for use in cinematographic gait analysis.

IF 1.4 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Piotr Tabor, Iwona Palczewska, Rafał Grygiel, Elżbieta Olszewska, Wiesław Chwała, Andrzej Mastalerz
{"title":"A new human spine model for use in cinematographic gait analysis.","authors":"Piotr Tabor, Iwona Palczewska, Rafał Grygiel, Elżbieta Olszewska, Wiesław Chwała, Andrzej Mastalerz","doi":"10.1007/s00590-025-04269-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of two spine models: the broken curve model and a new four tangent circles model. The modification concerns the adaptation of data acquisition to kinematic methods used in, e.g., gait and running analysis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Plastic, movable spine model of human with flexible intervertebral disks (manufactured by Erler Zimmer GE3014) was used as the study material. Markers with a diameter of 5 mm were glued to each spinous process (from C<sub>7</sub> to L<sub>5</sub>). The recording was performed with a 6-camera Vicon system. Two spine models were created: a broken curve model used, among others, in the Diers scanner, and an own model of 4 circles, similar to the model of circles used in X-ray and CT analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The errors in the position of the spinous processes were significantly smaller in the 4-circle model than in the broken curve model. They ranged from 0.01 to 6.5 mm in the lumbar section, from 0.004 to 3.1 mm in the thoracic section. The practical possibilities of using the four-circle model during the cinematographic analysis of gait and run should be checked.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The four-circle model is more accurate than the broken curve model and can be used in the cinematographic analysis of the human spine movement.</p>","PeriodicalId":50484,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","volume":"35 1","pages":"183"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12064572/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-025-04269-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of two spine models: the broken curve model and a new four tangent circles model. The modification concerns the adaptation of data acquisition to kinematic methods used in, e.g., gait and running analysis.

Method: Plastic, movable spine model of human with flexible intervertebral disks (manufactured by Erler Zimmer GE3014) was used as the study material. Markers with a diameter of 5 mm were glued to each spinous process (from C7 to L5). The recording was performed with a 6-camera Vicon system. Two spine models were created: a broken curve model used, among others, in the Diers scanner, and an own model of 4 circles, similar to the model of circles used in X-ray and CT analysis.

Results: The errors in the position of the spinous processes were significantly smaller in the 4-circle model than in the broken curve model. They ranged from 0.01 to 6.5 mm in the lumbar section, from 0.004 to 3.1 mm in the thoracic section. The practical possibilities of using the four-circle model during the cinematographic analysis of gait and run should be checked.

Conclusion: The four-circle model is more accurate than the broken curve model and can be used in the cinematographic analysis of the human spine movement.

一种新的用于电影步态分析的人体脊柱模型。
目的:本研究的目的是比较两种脊柱模型的准确性:破碎曲线模型和新的四切线圆模型。该修改涉及数据采集对运动学方法的适应,例如步态和跑步分析。方法:采用Erler Zimmer GE3014制造的可活动人柔性椎间盘塑料脊柱模型作为研究材料。每个棘突(从C7到L5)粘上直径5mm的标记。录音是用一个6摄像头的Vicon系统进行的。创建了两个脊柱模型:一个是迪尔扫描仪中使用的断曲线模型,另一个是自己的4个圆圈模型,类似于x射线和CT分析中使用的圆圈模型。结果:4圆模型的棘突位置误差明显小于断曲线模型。腰段为0.01 ~ 6.5 mm,胸段为0.004 ~ 3.1 mm。在步态和跑动的电影分析中应用四圈模型的实际可能性需要进行检验。结论:四圆模型比断曲线模型更准确,可用于人体脊柱运动的电影分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
265
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (EJOST) aims to publish high quality Orthopedic scientific work. The objective of our journal is to disseminate meaningful, impactful, clinically relevant work from each and every region of the world, that has the potential to change and or inform clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信