Exclusion of intracranial lesions in mild traumatic brain injury using glial fibrillary acidic protein and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1: a European multicenter study.

IF 4.2 4区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
European Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-09 DOI:10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001234
Lara Milevoj Kopcinovic, Nora Nikolac Gabaj, Ivana Lapić, Dunja Rogić, Oana Roxana Oprea, Minodora Dobreanu, Jakub Nożewski, Mariusz Sieminski, Ewelina Stępniewska, Małgorzata Dąbrowska, Barbara Mroczko, Marzena Wojewódzka-Żelezniakowicz, Rakesh Jalali, Marcin Baluch, Joanna Malinowska, Jerzy Romaszko, Evgenija Homšak, Gregor Prosen, Matej Strnad, Helena Ferreira da Silva, Martina Pavletić, Vesna Šupak-Smolčić, Lidija Bilić-Zulle, Ana Tancabel Mačinković, Mate Lerga, Dušan Dobrota, Daniel Čierny, Štefan Sivák, Egon Kurča, Martina Martiníková
{"title":"Exclusion of intracranial lesions in mild traumatic brain injury using glial fibrillary acidic protein and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1: a European multicenter study.","authors":"Lara Milevoj Kopcinovic, Nora Nikolac Gabaj, Ivana Lapić, Dunja Rogić, Oana Roxana Oprea, Minodora Dobreanu, Jakub Nożewski, Mariusz Sieminski, Ewelina Stępniewska, Małgorzata Dąbrowska, Barbara Mroczko, Marzena Wojewódzka-Żelezniakowicz, Rakesh Jalali, Marcin Baluch, Joanna Malinowska, Jerzy Romaszko, Evgenija Homšak, Gregor Prosen, Matej Strnad, Helena Ferreira da Silva, Martina Pavletić, Vesna Šupak-Smolčić, Lidija Bilić-Zulle, Ana Tancabel Mačinković, Mate Lerga, Dušan Dobrota, Daniel Čierny, Štefan Sivák, Egon Kurča, Martina Martiníková","doi":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) are blood biomarkers that able to aid in the assessment of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) patients and reduce computed tomography (CT) overuse.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive performance of individual biomarkers and their combination (i.e. mTBI assay) in detecting clinically significant intracranial injuries in mTBI. Furthermore, the influence of older age on the predictive performance of individual biomarkers and their combination was investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective multicenter study was conducted in 12 European healthcare centers. Adults with suspected mTBI presenting to the emergency department (ED) of each participating healthcare center within 12 h of head trauma were enrolled. GFAP and UCH-L1 were determined in blood samples collected from each participant. Head CT was considered as reference standard for the presence of intracranial injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mTBI assay yielded the highest sensitivity [95.5%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 89.9-98.5] and the highest negative predictive value (NPV) value (97.3%, 95% CI: 93.9-98.9) for the exclusion of intracranial lesions in mTBI. The sensitivities and NPVs of individual biomarkers were lower compared with the mTBI assay. In adults over 65 years, the individual biomarkers and the mTBI assay displayed the weakest diagnostic performances. After optimizing cutoff values for the mTBI assay for older adults, the following diagnostic accuracy measures were obtained: sensitivity 87.7%, 95% CI: 77.2-94.5 and NPV: 94.4%, 95% CI: 89.6-97.0 ( P  < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The mTBI assay yielded high sensitivity and NPV for the exclusion of significant intracranial injuries in mTBI patients presenting to the ED within 12 h from injury, performing better than individual biomarkers. A significant age-dependent influence on the predictive performances of the individual biomarkers and the mTBI assay was demonstrated.</p>","PeriodicalId":11893,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"351-358"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001234","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) are blood biomarkers that able to aid in the assessment of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) patients and reduce computed tomography (CT) overuse.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive performance of individual biomarkers and their combination (i.e. mTBI assay) in detecting clinically significant intracranial injuries in mTBI. Furthermore, the influence of older age on the predictive performance of individual biomarkers and their combination was investigated.

Methods: This prospective multicenter study was conducted in 12 European healthcare centers. Adults with suspected mTBI presenting to the emergency department (ED) of each participating healthcare center within 12 h of head trauma were enrolled. GFAP and UCH-L1 were determined in blood samples collected from each participant. Head CT was considered as reference standard for the presence of intracranial injury.

Results: The mTBI assay yielded the highest sensitivity [95.5%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 89.9-98.5] and the highest negative predictive value (NPV) value (97.3%, 95% CI: 93.9-98.9) for the exclusion of intracranial lesions in mTBI. The sensitivities and NPVs of individual biomarkers were lower compared with the mTBI assay. In adults over 65 years, the individual biomarkers and the mTBI assay displayed the weakest diagnostic performances. After optimizing cutoff values for the mTBI assay for older adults, the following diagnostic accuracy measures were obtained: sensitivity 87.7%, 95% CI: 77.2-94.5 and NPV: 94.4%, 95% CI: 89.6-97.0 ( P  < 0.001).

Conclusion: The mTBI assay yielded high sensitivity and NPV for the exclusion of significant intracranial injuries in mTBI patients presenting to the ED within 12 h from injury, performing better than individual biomarkers. A significant age-dependent influence on the predictive performances of the individual biomarkers and the mTBI assay was demonstrated.

使用胶质纤维酸性蛋白和泛素c端水解酶- l1排除轻度外伤性脑损伤的颅内病变:一项欧洲多中心研究
背景:胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)和泛素c端酶- l1 (UCH-L1)是血液生物标志物,能够帮助评估轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)患者并减少计算机断层扫描(CT)的过度使用。目的:本研究的目的是评估个体生物标志物及其组合(即mTBI测定)在检测mTBI临床显著颅内损伤中的预测性能。此外,研究了年龄对个体生物标志物及其组合预测性能的影响。方法:本前瞻性多中心研究在12个欧洲医疗保健中心进行。在头部外伤后12小时内到每个参与医疗中心的急诊科(ED)就诊的疑似mTBI的成年人被纳入研究。测定每位参与者血样中的GFAP和UCH-L1。头颅CT作为颅内损伤存在的参考标准。结果:mTBI检测在排除颅内病变方面具有最高的敏感性[95.5%,95%可信区间(CI): 89.9 ~ 98.5]和最高的阴性预测值(NPV)值(97.3%,95% CI: 93.9 ~ 98.9)。与mTBI相比,单个生物标志物的敏感性和npv较低。在65岁以上的成年人中,个体生物标志物和mTBI检测显示出最弱的诊断性能。在优化老年人mTBI检测的截断值后,获得了以下诊断准确性指标:灵敏度87.7%,95% CI: 77.2-94.5, NPV: 94.4%, 95% CI: 89.6-97.0 (P)结论:mTBI检测在排除损伤后12小时内出现ED的mTBI患者的显著颅内损伤方面具有高灵敏度和NPV,优于个体生物标志物。个体生物标志物和mTBI测定的预测性能具有显著的年龄依赖性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
27.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Emergency Medicine is the official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine. It is devoted to serving the European emergency medicine community and to promoting European standards of training, diagnosis and care in this rapidly growing field. Published bimonthly, the Journal offers original papers on all aspects of acute injury and sudden illness, including: emergency medicine, anaesthesiology, cardiology, disaster medicine, intensive care, internal medicine, orthopaedics, paediatrics, toxicology and trauma care. It addresses issues on the organization of emergency services in hospitals and in the community and examines postgraduate training from European and global perspectives. The Journal also publishes papers focusing on the different models of emergency healthcare delivery in Europe and beyond. With a multidisciplinary approach, the European Journal of Emergency Medicine publishes scientific research, topical reviews, news of meetings and events of interest to the emergency medicine community. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool. ​
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信