The human photosensitive epilepsy model for clinical proof-of-principle trials of novel antiseizure medications: 2. Analysis of drug trials and predictive value of the model.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Epilepsia Pub Date : 2025-05-10 DOI:10.1111/epi.18444
Wolfgang Löscher, Dorothée Kasteleijn-Nolst Trenité
{"title":"The human photosensitive epilepsy model for clinical proof-of-principle trials of novel antiseizure medications: 2. Analysis of drug trials and predictive value of the model.","authors":"Wolfgang Löscher, Dorothée Kasteleijn-Nolst Trenité","doi":"10.1111/epi.18444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical development of novel antiseizure medications (ASMs) would benefit from an early proof of principle (POP) model. The photosensitivity model, which uses the photoparoxysmal electroencephalographic response (PPR) as a surrogate of seizures, is currently the only human model that allows POP trials of investigational compounds after a single drug administration. Typically, trials in this model are performed as single-blinded, placebo-controlled phase IIa POP studies, evaluating a range of doses in small groups of epilepsy patients. In the second part of this review, based on the background information provided in Part 1, we analyze the outcome of all published trials performed over roughly 50 years. Many of the 35 drugs tested in the model were also examined in traditional add-on trials in patients with epilepsy, thus allowing analysis of the predictivity of the model. Drugs were categorized into three groups: drugs that suppressed PPR; drugs that exerted no effect on PPR; and drugs that increased PPR, indicating a proconvulsant effect. For the vast majority of drugs, the model correctly predicted the drugs' activity during long-term studies in patients with different types of epilepsy, including focal onset epilepsies. For some investigational compounds, the model detected proconvulsant activity that had not been observed in preclinical animal experiments and phase I studies in healthy volunteers, demonstrating the value of the model for adverse event assessment in patients with epilepsy. Limitations of the model are that it does not predict the extent of drug resistance of patients' seizures during chronic administration or efficacy differentiation of the novel drug from existing ASMs. Photosensitive POP trials are a useful tool to quantitatively predict drug efficacy and in aiding dose selection for subsequent larger phase IIb trials with chronic drug administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18444","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical development of novel antiseizure medications (ASMs) would benefit from an early proof of principle (POP) model. The photosensitivity model, which uses the photoparoxysmal electroencephalographic response (PPR) as a surrogate of seizures, is currently the only human model that allows POP trials of investigational compounds after a single drug administration. Typically, trials in this model are performed as single-blinded, placebo-controlled phase IIa POP studies, evaluating a range of doses in small groups of epilepsy patients. In the second part of this review, based on the background information provided in Part 1, we analyze the outcome of all published trials performed over roughly 50 years. Many of the 35 drugs tested in the model were also examined in traditional add-on trials in patients with epilepsy, thus allowing analysis of the predictivity of the model. Drugs were categorized into three groups: drugs that suppressed PPR; drugs that exerted no effect on PPR; and drugs that increased PPR, indicating a proconvulsant effect. For the vast majority of drugs, the model correctly predicted the drugs' activity during long-term studies in patients with different types of epilepsy, including focal onset epilepsies. For some investigational compounds, the model detected proconvulsant activity that had not been observed in preclinical animal experiments and phase I studies in healthy volunteers, demonstrating the value of the model for adverse event assessment in patients with epilepsy. Limitations of the model are that it does not predict the extent of drug resistance of patients' seizures during chronic administration or efficacy differentiation of the novel drug from existing ASMs. Photosensitive POP trials are a useful tool to quantitatively predict drug efficacy and in aiding dose selection for subsequent larger phase IIb trials with chronic drug administration.

新型抗癫痫药物临床原理验证试验的人类光敏性癫痫模型:药物试验分析及模型的预测值。
新型抗癫痫药物(asm)的临床开发将受益于早期原理验证(POP)模型。光敏模型使用光性发作性脑电图反应(PPR)作为癫痫发作的替代,是目前唯一允许在单次给药后对研究化合物进行POP试验的人体模型。通常,该模型中的试验是作为单盲、安慰剂对照的IIa期POP研究进行的,评估小群体癫痫患者的一系列剂量。在本综述的第二部分,基于第一部分提供的背景信息,我们分析了近50年来所有已发表的试验的结果。在模型中测试的35种药物中,有许多也在癫痫患者的传统附加试验中进行了测试,从而可以分析模型的预测性。药物分为三组:抑制小反刍兽疫的药物;对小反刍兽疫没有作用的药物;以及增加PPR的药物,表明有抗惊厥作用。对于绝大多数药物,该模型在不同类型癫痫患者(包括局灶性癫痫)的长期研究中正确预测了药物的活性。对于一些研究化合物,该模型检测到在临床前动物实验和健康志愿者的I期研究中未观察到的前惊厥活性,证明了该模型在癫痫患者不良事件评估中的价值。该模型的局限性在于,它不能预测慢性给药期间患者癫痫发作的耐药程度,也不能预测新药与现有asm的疗效分化。光敏POP试验是定量预测药物疗效和辅助剂量选择的有用工具,可用于后续更大规模的IIb期慢性给药试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信