Comparing continuity of care before and after disability registration: A retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Zhaoyan Piao, Heekyung Choi, Boyoung Jeon, Euna Han
{"title":"Comparing continuity of care before and after disability registration: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Zhaoyan Piao, Heekyung Choi, Boyoung Jeon, Euna Han","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/mzaf045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Persons with disabilities often encounter barriers in accessing healthcare services. However, research on the impact of disability on the continuity of care (COC) remains limited. We assessed the changes in COC among disabled individuals to monitor alterations in their healthcare accessibility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort 2.0 DB. The Bice-Boxerman COC Index (COCI; 0-1 range; higher values indicate greater COC) was used, with disability status of the participants determined from the registered data. Propensity-score matching was conducted for the control group. Difference-in-difference analysis was conducted to evaluate pre- and post-disability changes in COC for people with disabilities relative to those without.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>COCI values were analyzed for 9,702 participants with disabilities and 19,404 control individuals. On average, the disability group scored 0.0343 lower than the control group one year before disability registration (p = 0.001) relative to the disability registration year. Similar results were obtained for the physical disability, visual disability, and hearing disability subgroups, with scores of - 0.0342, -0.0394, and -0.0285, respectively (p < 0.0001 for all groups). On the other hand, the neurological disability subgroup showed a marginal change in the COCI score, peaking two years before disability registration (-0.0757, p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Individuals with physical, visual, and hearing disabilities showed low COCI scores, with a significant decline occurring one year before disability registration. In contrast, the control group showed no change in COC. This result highlights the need to improve healthcare continuity, particularly for individuals with the respective disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":13800,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzaf045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Persons with disabilities often encounter barriers in accessing healthcare services. However, research on the impact of disability on the continuity of care (COC) remains limited. We assessed the changes in COC among disabled individuals to monitor alterations in their healthcare accessibility.

Methods: This study used the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort 2.0 DB. The Bice-Boxerman COC Index (COCI; 0-1 range; higher values indicate greater COC) was used, with disability status of the participants determined from the registered data. Propensity-score matching was conducted for the control group. Difference-in-difference analysis was conducted to evaluate pre- and post-disability changes in COC for people with disabilities relative to those without.

Results: COCI values were analyzed for 9,702 participants with disabilities and 19,404 control individuals. On average, the disability group scored 0.0343 lower than the control group one year before disability registration (p = 0.001) relative to the disability registration year. Similar results were obtained for the physical disability, visual disability, and hearing disability subgroups, with scores of - 0.0342, -0.0394, and -0.0285, respectively (p < 0.0001 for all groups). On the other hand, the neurological disability subgroup showed a marginal change in the COCI score, peaking two years before disability registration (-0.0757, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: Individuals with physical, visual, and hearing disabilities showed low COCI scores, with a significant decline occurring one year before disability registration. In contrast, the control group showed no change in COC. This result highlights the need to improve healthcare continuity, particularly for individuals with the respective disabilities.

比较残疾登记前后护理的连续性:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:残疾人在获得保健服务方面经常遇到障碍。然而,关于残疾对护理连续性(COC)影响的研究仍然有限。我们评估了残疾人COC的变化,以监测其医疗可及性的变化。方法:本研究采用国家健康保险服务-国家样本队列2.0 DB。Bice-Boxerman COC指数(COCI;0 - 1范围;数值越高,表明COC越高),参与者的残疾状态从登记的数据中确定。对照组进行倾向-得分匹配。采用差异中差异分析来评估残疾前后COC相对于非残疾者的变化。结果:分析了9702名残疾参与者和19404名对照个体的COCI值。残障组在残障登记前1年的平均得分较对照组低0.0343分(p = 0.001)。在身体残疾、视觉残疾和听力残疾亚组中也得到了类似的结果,得分分别为- 0.0342、-0.0394和-0.0285(所有组p < 0.0001)。另一方面,神经功能障碍亚组的COCI评分变化不大,在残疾登记前两年达到峰值(-0.0757,p < 0.0001)。结论:身体、视觉和听力残疾的个体COCI得分较低,在残疾登记前一年显著下降。相比之下,对照组的COC没有变化。这一结果突出表明,需要提高医疗保健的连续性,特别是对各自残疾的个人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.80%
发文量
87
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Quality in Health Care makes activities and research related to quality and safety in health care available to a worldwide readership. The Journal publishes papers in all disciplines related to the quality and safety of health care, including health services research, health care evaluation, technology assessment, health economics, utilization review, cost containment, and nursing care research, as well as clinical research related to quality of care. This peer-reviewed journal is truly interdisciplinary and includes contributions from representatives of all health professions such as doctors, nurses, quality assurance professionals, managers, politicians, social workers, and therapists, as well as researchers from health-related backgrounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信