Learning from Reflection on Patient Outcomes Data: How EHR Can Support Trainees in Graduate Medical Education on Inpatient Rotations.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Perspectives on Medical Education Pub Date : 2025-05-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5334/pme.1627
Margaret A Robinson, Christy Boscardin, Marieke Van der Schaaf, Justin L Sewell, Glenn Rosenbluth
{"title":"Learning from Reflection on Patient Outcomes Data: How EHR Can Support Trainees in Graduate Medical Education on Inpatient Rotations.","authors":"Margaret A Robinson, Christy Boscardin, Marieke Van der Schaaf, Justin L Sewell, Glenn Rosenbluth","doi":"10.5334/pme.1627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>As healthcare evolves into interdisciplinary, complex, team-based care that often includes shiftwork and sub-specialization, patient outcomes data has become necessary for trainees to engage in reflective practice in clinical environments. However, current practices around collecting and distributing such data to trainees are not effective. Specifically, it is not clear what patient data are significant and compelling to trainees for reflective practice. The goal of our study was to characterize trainee perspectives on what data are meaningful to promote reflective activities for learning in the clinical work environment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 2020-2021, we conducted a longitudinal cross-sectional study to assess trainee interest in clinical outcomes data. Over 14 days, pediatrics and internal medicine residents doing inpatient work at the University of California San Francisco completed surveys corresponding to recently opened patient charts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>958 surveys were completed by 41 participants (average 23 unique patient encounters per participant). Trainees expressed interest in follow-up for 32.9% of encounters (n = 315/958), most often to 'learn if something significant or unexpected happened.' Trainees most often desired follow-up patient data when they had made significant decisions or felt responsible.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Trainees were interested in clinical outcomes data for a limited number of patient encounters, highlighting challenges with current strategies to promote reflective practice using clinical outcomes data. While refinement of such approaches continues through consideration of what trainees find meaningful in data, understanding motivating and demotivating factors in trainees' outcomes data-seeking behaviors will also be crucial for success in using such data for learning opportunities.</p>","PeriodicalId":48532,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Medical Education","volume":"14 1","pages":"264-273"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12063598/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.1627","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: As healthcare evolves into interdisciplinary, complex, team-based care that often includes shiftwork and sub-specialization, patient outcomes data has become necessary for trainees to engage in reflective practice in clinical environments. However, current practices around collecting and distributing such data to trainees are not effective. Specifically, it is not clear what patient data are significant and compelling to trainees for reflective practice. The goal of our study was to characterize trainee perspectives on what data are meaningful to promote reflective activities for learning in the clinical work environment.

Methods: From 2020-2021, we conducted a longitudinal cross-sectional study to assess trainee interest in clinical outcomes data. Over 14 days, pediatrics and internal medicine residents doing inpatient work at the University of California San Francisco completed surveys corresponding to recently opened patient charts.

Results: 958 surveys were completed by 41 participants (average 23 unique patient encounters per participant). Trainees expressed interest in follow-up for 32.9% of encounters (n = 315/958), most often to 'learn if something significant or unexpected happened.' Trainees most often desired follow-up patient data when they had made significant decisions or felt responsible.

Discussion: Trainees were interested in clinical outcomes data for a limited number of patient encounters, highlighting challenges with current strategies to promote reflective practice using clinical outcomes data. While refinement of such approaches continues through consideration of what trainees find meaningful in data, understanding motivating and demotivating factors in trainees' outcomes data-seeking behaviors will also be crucial for success in using such data for learning opportunities.

从对患者结果数据的反思中学习:电子病历如何支持住院病人轮转的研究生医学教育学员。
导读:随着医疗保健发展成为跨学科、复杂、以团队为基础的护理,通常包括轮班和亚专业化,患者结果数据已成为学员在临床环境中进行反思实践的必要条件。然而,目前收集和分发这些数据给受训人员的做法并不有效。具体来说,目前尚不清楚哪些患者数据对学员进行反思性实践具有重要意义和吸引力。我们研究的目的是描述实习生的观点,即哪些数据对促进临床工作环境中学习的反思活动有意义。方法:从2020年到2021年,我们进行了一项纵向横断面研究,以评估实习生对临床结果数据的兴趣。在14天的时间里,在加州大学旧金山分校(University of California San Francisco)从事住院工作的儿科和内科住院医师完成了与最近开放的患者图表相对应的调查。结果:41名参与者完成了958项调查(平均每位参与者23次独特的患者接触)。32.9%的学员表示对随访感兴趣(n = 315/958),最常见的是“了解是否发生了重大或意想不到的事情”。当受训者做出重大决定或感到有责任时,他们最希望得到患者的随访数据。讨论:学员对有限数量患者的临床结果数据感兴趣,强调了当前使用临床结果数据促进反思性实践的策略所面临的挑战。通过考虑受训者在数据中发现的有意义的内容,对这些方法进行改进的同时,理解受训者结果数据寻求行为中的激励和抑制因素对于成功利用这些数据获得学习机会也至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
31
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Perspectives on Medical Education mission is support and enrich collaborative scholarship between education researchers and clinical educators, and to advance new knowledge regarding clinical education practices. Official journal of the The Netherlands Association of Medical Education (NVMO). Perspectives on Medical Education is a non-profit Open Access journal with no charges for authors to submit or publish an article, and the full text of all articles is freely available immediately upon publication, thanks to the sponsorship of The Netherlands Association for Medical Education. Perspectives on Medical Education is highly visible thanks to its unrestricted online access policy. Perspectives on Medical Education positions itself at the dynamic intersection of educational research and clinical education. While other journals in the health professional education domain orient predominantly to education researchers or to clinical educators, Perspectives positions itself at the collaborative interface between these perspectives. This unique positioning reflects the journal’s mission to support and enrich collaborative scholarship between education researchers and clinical educators, and to advance new knowledge regarding clinical education practices. Reflecting this mission, the journal both welcomes original research papers arising from scholarly collaborations among clinicians, teachers and researchers and papers providing resources to develop the community’s ability to conduct such collaborative research. The journal’s audience includes researchers and practitioners: researchers who wish to explore challenging questions of health professions education and clinical teachers who wish to both advance their practice and envision for themselves a collaborative role in scholarly educational innovation. This audience of researchers, clinicians and educators is both international and interdisciplinary. The journal has a long history. In 1982, the journal was founded by the Dutch Association for Medical Education, as a Dutch language journal (Netherlands Journal of Medical Education). As a Dutch journal it fuelled educational research and innovation in the Netherlands. It is one of the factors for the Dutch success in medical education. In 2012, it widened its scope, transforming into an international English language journal. The journal swiftly became international in all aspects: the readers, authors, reviewers and editorial board members. The editorial board members represent the different parental disciplines in the field of medical education, e.g. clinicians, social scientists, biomedical scientists, statisticians and linguists. Several of them are leading scholars. Three of the editors are in the top ten of most cited authors in the medical education field. Two editors were awarded the Karolinska Institute Prize for Research. Presently, Erik Driessen leads the journal as Editor in Chief. Perspectives on Medical Education is highly visible thanks to its unrestricted online access policy. It is sponsored by theThe Netherlands Association of Medical Education and offers free manuscript submission. Perspectives on Medical Education positions itself at the dynamic intersection of educational research and clinical education. While other journals in the health professional education domain orient predominantly to education researchers or to clinical educators, Perspectives positions itself at the collaborative interface between these perspectives. This unique positioning reflects the journal’s mission to support and enrich collaborative scholarship between education researchers and clinical educators, and to advance new knowledge regarding clinical education practices. Reflecting this mission, the journal both welcomes original research papers arising from scholarly collaborations among clinicians, teachers and researchers and papers providing resources to develop the community’s ability to conduct such collaborative research. The journal’s audience includes researchers and practitioners: researchers who wish to explore challenging questions of health professions education and clinical teachers who wish to both advance their practice and envision for themselves a collaborative role in scholarly educational innovation. This audience of researchers, clinicians and educators is both international and interdisciplinary. The journal has a long history. In 1982, the journal was founded by the Dutch Association for Medical Education, as a Dutch language journal (Netherlands Journal of Medical Education). As a Dutch journal it fuelled educational research and innovation in the Netherlands. It is one of the factors for the Dutch success in medical education. In 2012, it widened its scope, transforming into an international English language journal. The journal swiftly became international in all aspects: the readers, authors, reviewers and editorial board members. The editorial board members represent the different parental disciplines in the field of medical education, e.g. clinicians, social scientists, biomedical scientists, statisticians and linguists. Several of them are leading scholars. Three of the editors are in the top ten of most cited authors in the medical education field. Two editors were awarded the Karolinska Institute Prize for Research. Presently, Erik Driessen leads the journal as Editor in Chief. Perspectives on Medical Education is highly visible thanks to its unrestricted online access policy. It is sponsored by theThe Netherlands Association of Medical Education and offers free manuscript submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信