Coping strategies and family stress among married Palestinians in Israel during COVID-19.

IF 2 2区 心理学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Journal of Family Psychology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-24 DOI:10.1037/fam0001344
Niveen M Hassan-Abbas
{"title":"Coping strategies and family stress among married Palestinians in Israel during COVID-19.","authors":"Niveen M Hassan-Abbas","doi":"10.1037/fam0001344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of the study is to examine the coping strategies that Palestinian families in Israel relied on during the COVID-19 pandemic and the extent to which these strategies were associated with family stress and mental health outcomes. A total of 480 married individuals participated in an online survey. Participants completed self-report questionnaires, including Family Crisis Oriented Personal Evaluation Scale (F-COPES) to assess coping strategies, and additional measures to evaluate family stress and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study was conducted in spring 2020 after the general initial lockdown in Israel was lifted. The results indicated that, as expected, families relied most on internal resources, namely, reframing and spiritual support, while strategies requiring external support, such as social support and mobilizing help, were less relied upon. Regression analyses revealed that, as expected, reframing and spiritual support were significantly associated with lower stress and better mental health, whereas mobilizing help predicted higher stress and poorer mental health, and social support did not significantly predict family stress or mental health. Contrary to expectations, passive appraisal was also associated with higher stress and poorer mental health. These findings suggest that during the COVID-19 pandemic, families from this specific society in Israel relied more on internal coping strategies, with external support mechanisms proving less effective. The study highlights the unique challenges faced by minority populations during global health crises. These implications call for more culturally relevant mental health interventions and improved accessibility to support services for minority groups in times of crisis. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"745-755"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0001344","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study is to examine the coping strategies that Palestinian families in Israel relied on during the COVID-19 pandemic and the extent to which these strategies were associated with family stress and mental health outcomes. A total of 480 married individuals participated in an online survey. Participants completed self-report questionnaires, including Family Crisis Oriented Personal Evaluation Scale (F-COPES) to assess coping strategies, and additional measures to evaluate family stress and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study was conducted in spring 2020 after the general initial lockdown in Israel was lifted. The results indicated that, as expected, families relied most on internal resources, namely, reframing and spiritual support, while strategies requiring external support, such as social support and mobilizing help, were less relied upon. Regression analyses revealed that, as expected, reframing and spiritual support were significantly associated with lower stress and better mental health, whereas mobilizing help predicted higher stress and poorer mental health, and social support did not significantly predict family stress or mental health. Contrary to expectations, passive appraisal was also associated with higher stress and poorer mental health. These findings suggest that during the COVID-19 pandemic, families from this specific society in Israel relied more on internal coping strategies, with external support mechanisms proving less effective. The study highlights the unique challenges faced by minority populations during global health crises. These implications call for more culturally relevant mental health interventions and improved accessibility to support services for minority groups in times of crisis. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

2019冠状病毒病期间以色列已婚巴勒斯坦人的应对策略和家庭压力
该研究的目的是研究在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,以色列巴勒斯坦家庭所依赖的应对策略,以及这些策略在多大程度上与家庭压力和心理健康结果相关。共有480名已婚人士参与了这项在线调查。参与者完成了自我报告问卷,包括家庭危机导向个人评估量表(F-COPES),以评估应对策略,以及评估COVID-19大流行期间家庭压力和心理健康的其他措施。这项研究是在以色列解除初步封锁后的2020年春季进行的。结果表明,正如预期的那样,家庭最依赖内部资源,即重构和精神支持,而需要外部支持的策略,如社会支持和动员帮助,则较少依赖。回归分析显示,正如预期的那样,重构和精神支持与较低的压力和较好的心理健康显著相关,而动员帮助预测较高的压力和较差的心理健康,社会支持不显著预测家庭压力或心理健康。与预期相反,被动评价也与更高的压力和更差的心理健康有关。这些发现表明,在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,以色列这一特定社会的家庭更多地依赖于内部应对策略,而外部支持机制的效果较差。该研究强调了少数群体在全球卫生危机期间面临的独特挑战。这些影响要求采取更多与文化相关的心理健康干预措施,并在危机时期改善少数群体获得支助服务的机会。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
200
期刊介绍: Journal of Family Psychology offers cutting-edge, groundbreaking, state-of-the-art, and innovative empirical research with real-world applicability in the field of family psychology. This premiere family research journal is devoted to the study of the family system, broadly defined, from multiple perspectives and to the application of psychological methods to advance knowledge related to family research, patterns and processes, and assessment and intervention, as well as to policies relevant to advancing the quality of life for families.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信