Timeline for Repeat EMS Encounters Resulting in Transport Following "Lift Assist" in a Suburban EMS System.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Maia Dorsett, Heather Allen, Holland Garbacz, Benjamin Sensenbach, Shivram Kumar, Courtney M C Jones, Jeremy T Cushman
{"title":"Timeline for Repeat EMS Encounters Resulting in Transport Following \"Lift Assist\" in a Suburban EMS System.","authors":"Maia Dorsett, Heather Allen, Holland Garbacz, Benjamin Sensenbach, Shivram Kumar, Courtney M C Jones, Jeremy T Cushman","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2025.2502459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>When emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians provide mobilization assistance to geriatric fall patients without transport, this is often coded as a \"lift assist.\" Previous research has shown many of these patients are subsequently transported, suggesting the \"lift assist\" may signal the presence of underlying medical illness or decline in functional condition. Understanding the timeline for repeat visits requiring transport is critical to improvement initiatives seeking to reduce diagnostic delays for this population. The primary objective of this study was to describe the timeline and factors associated with subsequent transport following an index EMS encounter for lift assist.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective analysis of one year (2022) of patient encounters in a suburban EMS system with ∼120K dispatches per year. Patients ≥ 60 years of age were included if they had at least one repeat EMS encounter within 7 days of a non-transport with a primary impression of lift assist. The population was described using descriptive statistics. Associations between assessment completeness and abnormal vital signs with odds of subsequent transport versus non-transport were evaluated using logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1054 EMS encounters were analyzed, accounting for 574 repeat encounters involving 428 unique patients and 480 patient clusters. Number of repeat encounters within 7 days ranged from one to six, with 84% (<i>n</i> = 406) having only one. Of initial EMS encounters, 14% were missing at least one vital sign, and abnormal vital signs were observed (HR > 100:10% (<i>n</i> = 459), SBP < 110:8% (<i>n</i> = 448), SpO<sub>2</sub> < 90%:4% (<i>n</i> = 425)). On repeat encounter, patients were transported in 76% of cases. The primary impression indicated a medical etiology in 61% of repeat encounters and 1% were for cardiac arrest. Median time to first repeat encounter resulting in transport was 1.13 days (IQR 0.33 to 3.33 days). No association was found between abnormal vital signs or ambulation assessment with odds of transport on subsequent encounter.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most repeat patient encounters following index lift assist occur within 72 h and result in transport, most commonly for presumed medical etiology. Ambulation assessment, abnormal or missing vital signs were not associated with increased odds of transport on repeat visits in this limited patient sample.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2025.2502459","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: When emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians provide mobilization assistance to geriatric fall patients without transport, this is often coded as a "lift assist." Previous research has shown many of these patients are subsequently transported, suggesting the "lift assist" may signal the presence of underlying medical illness or decline in functional condition. Understanding the timeline for repeat visits requiring transport is critical to improvement initiatives seeking to reduce diagnostic delays for this population. The primary objective of this study was to describe the timeline and factors associated with subsequent transport following an index EMS encounter for lift assist.

Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of one year (2022) of patient encounters in a suburban EMS system with ∼120K dispatches per year. Patients ≥ 60 years of age were included if they had at least one repeat EMS encounter within 7 days of a non-transport with a primary impression of lift assist. The population was described using descriptive statistics. Associations between assessment completeness and abnormal vital signs with odds of subsequent transport versus non-transport were evaluated using logistic regression analysis.

Results: In total, 1054 EMS encounters were analyzed, accounting for 574 repeat encounters involving 428 unique patients and 480 patient clusters. Number of repeat encounters within 7 days ranged from one to six, with 84% (n = 406) having only one. Of initial EMS encounters, 14% were missing at least one vital sign, and abnormal vital signs were observed (HR > 100:10% (n = 459), SBP < 110:8% (n = 448), SpO2 < 90%:4% (n = 425)). On repeat encounter, patients were transported in 76% of cases. The primary impression indicated a medical etiology in 61% of repeat encounters and 1% were for cardiac arrest. Median time to first repeat encounter resulting in transport was 1.13 days (IQR 0.33 to 3.33 days). No association was found between abnormal vital signs or ambulation assessment with odds of transport on subsequent encounter.

Conclusions: Most repeat patient encounters following index lift assist occur within 72 h and result in transport, most commonly for presumed medical etiology. Ambulation assessment, abnormal or missing vital signs were not associated with increased odds of transport on repeat visits in this limited patient sample.

在郊区的紧急医疗服务系统中,重复的紧急医疗服务遭遇导致在“电梯辅助”下被转移的时间线。
目的:当紧急医疗服务(EMS)临床医生提供动员援助老年跌倒患者没有运输,这通常被编码为“升降机协助。”先前的研究表明,这些患者中的许多人随后被运送,这表明“升降机辅助”可能表明存在潜在的医学疾病或功能状况下降。了解需要运输的重复就诊的时间表对于寻求减少这一人群诊断延误的改进举措至关重要。本研究的主要目的是描述在紧急急救系统(EMS)遇到升降机辅助后,与后续运输相关的时间线和因素。方法:回顾性分析一年(2022年)在郊区EMS系统就诊的患者,每年约120K次调度。≥60岁的患者,如果他们在非运输后7天内至少有一次重复的EMS遭遇,主要印象是抬起辅助。总体用描述性统计进行描述。评估完整性和异常生命体征与随后转运与非转运的几率之间的关联使用逻辑回归分析进行评估。结果:共分析了1054次急诊就诊,其中574次重复就诊,涉及428例独特患者和480例患者群。7天内重复接触的次数从1次到6次不等,84%(n = 406)只有一次。在首次EMS就诊中,14%的患者至少缺少一个生命体征,并观察到异常生命体征(HR bbb100:10% (n = 459),收缩压< 110:8%(n = 448), SpO2)。结论:大多数患者在指数提升辅助后72小时内重复就诊并导致转运,最常见的是假定的医学病因。在这个有限的患者样本中,活动评估、生命体征异常或缺失与重复就诊的转运几率增加无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信