Distal ulnar neck fracture displacement with forearm rotation: A biomechanical cadaveric study.

IF 0.3 Q4 SURGERY
Journal of Hand and Microsurgery Pub Date : 2025-04-05 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jham.2025.100254
Camelia Qian Ying Tang, Sean Han Sheng Lai, Amit Kumarsing Ramruttun, Siaw Meng Chou, Alphonsus Khin Sze Chong, Sreedharan Sechachalam
{"title":"Distal ulnar neck fracture displacement with forearm rotation: A biomechanical cadaveric study.","authors":"Camelia Qian Ying Tang, Sean Han Sheng Lai, Amit Kumarsing Ramruttun, Siaw Meng Chou, Alphonsus Khin Sze Chong, Sreedharan Sechachalam","doi":"10.1016/j.jham.2025.100254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Management of distal ulnar fractures remains controversial, partly due to its low incidence and operative challenges encountered during surgical fixation. This cadaveric study examined fracture displacement in isolated distal ulnar fractures, specifically AO Muller Q2 and Biyani Type I fracture pattern, during forearm pronosupination.6 fresh frozen cadaveric upper limbs amputated at mid-humerus were used. Soft tissues including proximal and distal radioulnar joints were carefully preserved. Specimens were inspected grossly and radiographically for absence of pathologies. Radiocarpal and midcarpal pinning was performed to facilitate quantification of forearm rotation. 2 markers were each placed proximal and distal to fracture site to quantify fracture displacement. 3-dimensional positional data was recorded using an optoelectronic system (Vicon MX motion capture system).Distance between the 2 markers increased in the proximodistal and radioulnar axis, and decreased in the dorsovolar axis when the forearm was rotated from neutral to 100° pronation. The inverse was observed during supination. Mean aggregate fracture site displacement increased to 9.17 ± 2.78 mm at 100° pronation. Statistically significant increase in aggregate fracture site displacement was observed from 60° pronation onwards. At 100° supination, the aggregate fracture site displacement was 4.58 ± 8.62 mm. When supinating from neutral to 100°, fracture displacement did not increase significantly.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>from this study suggest that distal ulnar fractures are potentially stable, particularly in supination. However, unrestricted forearm pronation with inadequate immobilisation might still cause further fracture displacement. Further studies are required to assess distal ulnar fracture stability in vivo before treatment guidelines can be established.</p>","PeriodicalId":45368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery","volume":"17 4","pages":"100254"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12032868/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jham.2025.100254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Management of distal ulnar fractures remains controversial, partly due to its low incidence and operative challenges encountered during surgical fixation. This cadaveric study examined fracture displacement in isolated distal ulnar fractures, specifically AO Muller Q2 and Biyani Type I fracture pattern, during forearm pronosupination.6 fresh frozen cadaveric upper limbs amputated at mid-humerus were used. Soft tissues including proximal and distal radioulnar joints were carefully preserved. Specimens were inspected grossly and radiographically for absence of pathologies. Radiocarpal and midcarpal pinning was performed to facilitate quantification of forearm rotation. 2 markers were each placed proximal and distal to fracture site to quantify fracture displacement. 3-dimensional positional data was recorded using an optoelectronic system (Vicon MX motion capture system).Distance between the 2 markers increased in the proximodistal and radioulnar axis, and decreased in the dorsovolar axis when the forearm was rotated from neutral to 100° pronation. The inverse was observed during supination. Mean aggregate fracture site displacement increased to 9.17 ± 2.78 mm at 100° pronation. Statistically significant increase in aggregate fracture site displacement was observed from 60° pronation onwards. At 100° supination, the aggregate fracture site displacement was 4.58 ± 8.62 mm. When supinating from neutral to 100°, fracture displacement did not increase significantly.

Results: from this study suggest that distal ulnar fractures are potentially stable, particularly in supination. However, unrestricted forearm pronation with inadequate immobilisation might still cause further fracture displacement. Further studies are required to assess distal ulnar fracture stability in vivo before treatment guidelines can be established.

前臂旋转导致尺颈远端骨折移位:生物力学尸体研究。
尺远端骨折的处理仍然存在争议,部分原因是其发病率低,手术固定遇到的操作挑战。本尸体研究检查了前臂旋前期间孤立尺骨远端骨折的骨折移位,特别是AO Muller Q2和Biyani型骨折模式。采用肱骨中部截去的新鲜冰冻尸体上肢6例。软组织包括近端和远端尺桡关节被小心地保存。标本经肉眼及影像学检查未见病变。桡腕和腕中钉住便于量化前臂旋转。在骨折部位近端和远端各放置2个标记来量化骨折位移。使用光电系统(Vicon MX运动捕捉系统)记录三维位置数据。当前臂从中性旋到100°旋前时,这两个标记物之间的距离在近远端和尺桡轴上增加,在背掌轴上减少。旋后时观察到相反的情况。在100°旋前时,平均骨性骨折位置位移增加到9.17±2.78 mm。从统计上看,从旋前60°开始,骨性骨折部位移位显著增加。旋后100°时,骨性骨折部位位移为4.58±8.62 mm。旋后从中性到100°时,骨折位移没有明显增加。结果:本研究提示尺侧远端骨折具有潜在的稳定性,尤其是旋后骨折。然而,不受限制的前臂内旋和不充分的固定仍然可能导致进一步的骨折移位。在制定治疗指南之前,需要进一步的研究来评估尺远端骨折的体内稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信