Individual and shared situational awareness in in-hospital cardiac arrest: insights from a real-world observational study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Bashaer Salem Alnadwi, Modi Al-Moteri
{"title":"Individual and shared situational awareness in in-hospital cardiac arrest: insights from a real-world observational study.","authors":"Bashaer Salem Alnadwi, Modi Al-Moteri","doi":"10.1111/imj.70064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individual and shared situational awareness (SA) are crucial for team performance in high-pressure emergencies like cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). While SA has been extensively studied in simulations, little research has examined its role in real-world in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) settings. This study assessed individual and shared SA among medical emergency team (MET) members during CPR and explored its influence on team structure, communication and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in real-world clinical settings, involving seven METs (n = 40). Individual SA was measured using the Situation Awareness Global Assessment Technique (SAGAT), while shared SA was assessed via a similarity index reflecting the alignment of team members' responses. Associations between SA, team structure, stress levels and clinical performance were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings showed substantial variability in individual SA, with only 25% achieving full SA. Shared SA scores ranged from 0.95 ± 0.046 to 0.78 ± 0.144, with higher scores significantly associated with improved team structure (P = 0.034) and resuscitation success (P = 0.048). Mental work stress during CPR was linked to lower individual SA (P = 0.004), highlighting cognitive overload's impact on SA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identifies critical SA gaps, affecting both individual performance and team coordination. Shared SA is a key predictor of resuscitation success and should be enhanced through structured SA training, high-frequency simulations and algorithm-driven protocols to improve team synchronisation, decision-making and patient outcomes in IHCA settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70064","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Individual and shared situational awareness (SA) are crucial for team performance in high-pressure emergencies like cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). While SA has been extensively studied in simulations, little research has examined its role in real-world in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) settings. This study assessed individual and shared SA among medical emergency team (MET) members during CPR and explored its influence on team structure, communication and outcomes.

Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in real-world clinical settings, involving seven METs (n = 40). Individual SA was measured using the Situation Awareness Global Assessment Technique (SAGAT), while shared SA was assessed via a similarity index reflecting the alignment of team members' responses. Associations between SA, team structure, stress levels and clinical performance were analysed.

Results: Findings showed substantial variability in individual SA, with only 25% achieving full SA. Shared SA scores ranged from 0.95 ± 0.046 to 0.78 ± 0.144, with higher scores significantly associated with improved team structure (P = 0.034) and resuscitation success (P = 0.048). Mental work stress during CPR was linked to lower individual SA (P = 0.004), highlighting cognitive overload's impact on SA.

Conclusions: This study identifies critical SA gaps, affecting both individual performance and team coordination. Shared SA is a key predictor of resuscitation success and should be enhanced through structured SA training, high-frequency simulations and algorithm-driven protocols to improve team synchronisation, decision-making and patient outcomes in IHCA settings.

医院内心脏骤停中的个人和共享情境意识:来自现实世界观察性研究的见解
背景:在心肺复苏(CPR)等高压紧急情况下,个人和共享的情境感知(SA)对团队绩效至关重要。虽然SA在模拟中得到了广泛的研究,但很少有研究检查其在现实世界医院内心脏骤停(IHCA)环境中的作用。本研究旨在评估医疗急救团队成员在心肺复苏术过程中的个体和集体SA,并探讨其对团队结构、沟通和结果的影响。方法:在现实世界的临床环境中进行了一项横断面观察性研究,涉及7名METs (n = 40)。个体SA使用情境感知全局评估技术(SAGAT)进行测量,而共享SA通过反映团队成员反应一致性的相似性指数进行评估。分析了SA、团队结构、压力水平和临床表现之间的关系。结果:研究结果显示个体SA存在很大差异,只有25%的患者达到完全SA。共享SA评分范围为0.95±0.046 ~ 0.78±0.144,评分越高,团队结构越完善(P = 0.034),复苏成功率越高(P = 0.048)。心肺复苏术期间的精神工作压力与个体SA降低有关(P = 0.004),突出了认知超载对SA的影响。结论:本研究确定了影响个人绩效和团队协调的关键SA差距。共享SA是复苏成功的关键预测指标,应通过结构化SA培训、高频模拟和算法驱动的协议来加强,以改善IHCA环境下的团队同步、决策和患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Internal Medicine Journal
Internal Medicine Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
600
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Internal Medicine Journal is the official journal of the Adult Medicine Division of The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP). Its purpose is to publish high-quality internationally competitive peer-reviewed original medical research, both laboratory and clinical, relating to the study and research of human disease. Papers will be considered from all areas of medical practice and science. The Journal also has a major role in continuing medical education and publishes review articles relevant to physician education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信