Cost-Effectiveness of Oral Levofloxacin Versus Amoxicillin-Clavulanate/Ciprofloxacin for Outpatient Management of Low-Risk Febrile Neutropenia in Children With Cancer in Egypt.

IF 3.2 Q2 ONCOLOGY
JCO Global Oncology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-23 DOI:10.1200/GO.24.00182
Reham Abdelaziz Khedr, Ebtehal Ali, Zeinab Ahmad Elshafei, Hadir Ahmed El-Mahallawy, Nashwa Ezz Eldeen
{"title":"Cost-Effectiveness of Oral Levofloxacin Versus Amoxicillin-Clavulanate/Ciprofloxacin for Outpatient Management of Low-Risk Febrile Neutropenia in Children With Cancer in Egypt.","authors":"Reham Abdelaziz Khedr, Ebtehal Ali, Zeinab Ahmad Elshafei, Hadir Ahmed El-Mahallawy, Nashwa Ezz Eldeen","doi":"10.1200/GO.24.00182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a common cancer complication in children. A growing body of evidence suggests that home-based care with oral antibiotics is safe and effective in carefully selected children with low-risk (LR) FN. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of oral levofloxacin versus oral amoxicillin-clavulanate/ciprofloxacin in the management of LR-FN in children with cancer over a time horizon of 7 days from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) perspective.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This is a randomized controlled study conducted at the NCI from December 2021 to September 2022, including children and adolescents age between 3 and 18 years who presented to the emergency room with LR-FN criteria with the exclusion of patients younger than 3 years and patients with Down syndrome. One hundred LR-FN episodes were enrolled in each arm. Patient demographics, microbiologic data, and outcomes were collected at different time points. A decision analytic model was created to compare the two treatment strategies. The outcome measures included quality-adjusted FN episodes, costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Levofloxacin was a safe and effective treatment option for LR-FN. It proved to be the dominant strategy against amoxicillin-clavulanate/ciprofloxacin with an incremental quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of 0.0001 and a lower cost of 62.4996 Egyptian pounds (EGPs) in the treatment of home-based LR-FN with a willingness to pay a threshold of 77,520 EGPs per QALY (1 gross domestic product/capita).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For the treatment of FN in pediatric patients with cancer, levofloxacin offers a cost-saving option with improved survival benefits over a 7-day time horizon from the NCI perspective. These findings will help health care decisions regarding the allocation of health care system resources to improve supportive care for patients with LR-FN.</p>","PeriodicalId":14806,"journal":{"name":"JCO Global Oncology","volume":"11 ","pages":"e2400182"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Global Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/GO.24.00182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a common cancer complication in children. A growing body of evidence suggests that home-based care with oral antibiotics is safe and effective in carefully selected children with low-risk (LR) FN. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of oral levofloxacin versus oral amoxicillin-clavulanate/ciprofloxacin in the management of LR-FN in children with cancer over a time horizon of 7 days from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) perspective.

Patients and methods: This is a randomized controlled study conducted at the NCI from December 2021 to September 2022, including children and adolescents age between 3 and 18 years who presented to the emergency room with LR-FN criteria with the exclusion of patients younger than 3 years and patients with Down syndrome. One hundred LR-FN episodes were enrolled in each arm. Patient demographics, microbiologic data, and outcomes were collected at different time points. A decision analytic model was created to compare the two treatment strategies. The outcome measures included quality-adjusted FN episodes, costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.

Results: Levofloxacin was a safe and effective treatment option for LR-FN. It proved to be the dominant strategy against amoxicillin-clavulanate/ciprofloxacin with an incremental quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of 0.0001 and a lower cost of 62.4996 Egyptian pounds (EGPs) in the treatment of home-based LR-FN with a willingness to pay a threshold of 77,520 EGPs per QALY (1 gross domestic product/capita).

Conclusion: For the treatment of FN in pediatric patients with cancer, levofloxacin offers a cost-saving option with improved survival benefits over a 7-day time horizon from the NCI perspective. These findings will help health care decisions regarding the allocation of health care system resources to improve supportive care for patients with LR-FN.

口服左氧氟沙星与阿莫西林-克拉维酸/环丙沙星在门诊治疗低风险发热性中性粒细胞减少症中的成本-效果
目的:发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)是儿童常见的癌症并发症。越来越多的证据表明,对于精心挑选的低风险(LR) FN患儿,以家庭为基础的口服抗生素护理是安全有效的。本研究旨在从国家癌症研究所(NCI)的角度评估口服左氧氟沙星与口服阿莫西林-克拉维酸/环丙沙星在7天内治疗癌症儿童LR-FN的疗效和安全性。患者和方法:这是一项于2021年12月至2022年9月在NCI进行的随机对照研究,包括3至18岁的儿童和青少年,他们在急诊室就诊时符合LR-FN标准,排除3岁以下患者和唐氏综合征患者。每组入组100例LR-FN。在不同时间点收集患者人口统计学、微生物学数据和结果。建立了一个决策分析模型来比较两种治疗策略。结果测量包括经质量调整的FN发作、成本和增量成本-效果比。结果:左氧氟沙星是一种安全有效的治疗LR-FN的方法。事实证明,它是对抗阿莫西林-克拉维酸/环丙沙星的主要策略,其增量质量调整生命年(QALY)为0.0001,治疗基于家庭的LR-FN的成本较低,为62.4996埃及镑(EGPs),每个QALY(1国内生产总值/人均)愿意支付77,520埃及镑的门槛。结论:从NCI的角度来看,左氧氟沙星治疗小儿癌症患者的FN提供了一种节省成本的选择,并提高了7天的生存期。这些发现将有助于卫生保健决策有关卫生保健系统资源的分配,以改善支持护理的患者与LR-FN。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JCO Global Oncology
JCO Global Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
310
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信