Marta Cancella De Abreu, Caren Brumpt, Timothé Sala, Nathalie Oueidat, Martin Larsen, Pierre Hausfater
{"title":"Cell population data for early detection of sepsis in patients with suspected infection in the emergency department.","authors":"Marta Cancella De Abreu, Caren Brumpt, Timothé Sala, Nathalie Oueidat, Martin Larsen, Pierre Hausfater","doi":"10.1515/cclm-2025-0180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Traditional biomarkers used for sepsis diagnosis have limited sensitivity and specificity and, so far, are not recommended for sepsis diagnosis. We aimed to evaluate diagnostic accuracy of XN-9000<sup>®</sup> hematology analyzer derived cell population data (CPD) for sepsis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional cohort study on patients admitted to an emergency department (ED) with a suspicion of infection, having a complete blood count with differential (CBC-Diff). CBC-Diff were performed on XN-9000<sup>®</sup> analyzer (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan). CPD were measured routinely for each CBC-Diff ordered by ED physician. They include: neutrophils-related - Neut-GI and Neut-RI; monocytes-related - Mono-X, Mono-Z, Re-Mono and Mono-Y; IG referring to immature granulocytes; and lymphocytes-related - As-lymp and Re-lymp. Intensive care infection (ICIS) and neutrophile and monocyte (NEMO) scores were calculated using several CPD parameters. Diagnostic performance of each biomarker was computed together with receiver operating characteristic curves for sepsis diagnosis (according to Sepsis-3 definition).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,155 patients with a suspicion of infection were included and 230 had sepsis. Median age was 64 years and 49 % were female. Except for lymphocyte count with an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of 0.67 (95 % confidential interval 0.63-0.70), the other CPD exhibited modest performances with AUROC under 0.65. The ICIS and NEMO scores had a modest performance with AUROC of 0.56 (0.52-0.61) and 0.55 (0.51-0.59) respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>None of the biomarkers and scores tested demonstrated sufficient diagnostic accuracy to be recommended for routine sepsis screening in the ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":10390,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1654-1662"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2025-0180","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Traditional biomarkers used for sepsis diagnosis have limited sensitivity and specificity and, so far, are not recommended for sepsis diagnosis. We aimed to evaluate diagnostic accuracy of XN-9000® hematology analyzer derived cell population data (CPD) for sepsis.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional cohort study on patients admitted to an emergency department (ED) with a suspicion of infection, having a complete blood count with differential (CBC-Diff). CBC-Diff were performed on XN-9000® analyzer (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan). CPD were measured routinely for each CBC-Diff ordered by ED physician. They include: neutrophils-related - Neut-GI and Neut-RI; monocytes-related - Mono-X, Mono-Z, Re-Mono and Mono-Y; IG referring to immature granulocytes; and lymphocytes-related - As-lymp and Re-lymp. Intensive care infection (ICIS) and neutrophile and monocyte (NEMO) scores were calculated using several CPD parameters. Diagnostic performance of each biomarker was computed together with receiver operating characteristic curves for sepsis diagnosis (according to Sepsis-3 definition).
Results: A total of 1,155 patients with a suspicion of infection were included and 230 had sepsis. Median age was 64 years and 49 % were female. Except for lymphocyte count with an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of 0.67 (95 % confidential interval 0.63-0.70), the other CPD exhibited modest performances with AUROC under 0.65. The ICIS and NEMO scores had a modest performance with AUROC of 0.56 (0.52-0.61) and 0.55 (0.51-0.59) respectively.
Conclusions: None of the biomarkers and scores tested demonstrated sufficient diagnostic accuracy to be recommended for routine sepsis screening in the ED.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) publishes articles on novel teaching and training methods applicable to laboratory medicine. CCLM welcomes contributions on the progress in fundamental and applied research and cutting-edge clinical laboratory medicine. It is one of the leading journals in the field, with an impact factor over 3. CCLM is issued monthly, and it is published in print and electronically.
CCLM is the official journal of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and publishes regularly EFLM recommendations and news. CCLM is the official journal of the National Societies from Austria (ÖGLMKC); Belgium (RBSLM); Germany (DGKL); Hungary (MLDT); Ireland (ACBI); Italy (SIBioC); Portugal (SPML); and Slovenia (SZKK); and it is affiliated to AACB (Australia) and SFBC (France).
Topics:
- clinical biochemistry
- clinical genomics and molecular biology
- clinical haematology and coagulation
- clinical immunology and autoimmunity
- clinical microbiology
- drug monitoring and analysis
- evaluation of diagnostic biomarkers
- disease-oriented topics (cardiovascular disease, cancer diagnostics, diabetes)
- new reagents, instrumentation and technologies
- new methodologies
- reference materials and methods
- reference values and decision limits
- quality and safety in laboratory medicine
- translational laboratory medicine
- clinical metrology
Follow @cclm_degruyter on Twitter!