Patient perspectives on surgical handover quality: a mixed-methods survey.

IF 2.6 Q1 SURGERY
Jessica M Ryan, Philip Tomlinson, Anastasija Simiceva, Dara O Kavanagh, Walter Eppich, Ailbhe O'Driscoll Collins, Bevin Arthurs, Catherine Timon, Luke McGarry, Clothilde Dunleavy, Sandra Stewart, Annabella Stewart-Miller, Adam Fairhurst, Simon Roe, William Murray, Deborah A McNamara
{"title":"Patient perspectives on surgical handover quality: a mixed-methods survey.","authors":"Jessica M Ryan, Philip Tomlinson, Anastasija Simiceva, Dara O Kavanagh, Walter Eppich, Ailbhe O'Driscoll Collins, Bevin Arthurs, Catherine Timon, Luke McGarry, Clothilde Dunleavy, Sandra Stewart, Annabella Stewart-Miller, Adam Fairhurst, Simon Roe, William Murray, Deborah A McNamara","doi":"10.1186/s13037-025-00437-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In-hospital handover of patient care is an essential but high-risk professional activity that often lacks transparency for patients. The purpose of this survey was to gain insight into surgical patients' perceptions of handover communications between doctors, incorporating patient and public involvement to enhance accessibility and understanding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional, mixed-methods survey was developed with patient and public involvement and distributed to general surgery patients in two University Teaching Hospitals between 24 October 2023 and 21 July 2024. Comparative analyses of quantitative data were performed using McNemar's test for paired nominal data and Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous data. Free-text responses underwent thematic analysis to validate and expand on quantitative findings. Patient and public involvement partners contributed to study design, methodology, and the final manuscript.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 208 responses were received (52.3%). Significantly more patients reported having prior knowledge of nursing handovers (73.1%) compared to doctors' handovers (63.9%; x<sup>2</sup> = 14.53, p = 0.0002). Patient perceptions of the handover process were generally positive; although satisfaction declined significantly with weekend handovers (p < 0.05). Thematic analysis identified four themes: (1) the impact of poor inter-professional communication, (2) the importance of teamwork, (3) external factors influencing handover effectiveness, and (4) patient nonchalance about their care. The use of patient and public involvement in this study improved survey accessibility and understanding of the concept and importance of handover.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows limited prior awareness of handover between doctors among surgical patients, especially the potential hazards that can arise if performed poorly. Patient and public involvement improved accessibility and understanding of the topic; however, challenges such as adequate training for meaningful engagement remain.</p>","PeriodicalId":46782,"journal":{"name":"Patient Safety in Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12049061/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Safety in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-025-00437-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In-hospital handover of patient care is an essential but high-risk professional activity that often lacks transparency for patients. The purpose of this survey was to gain insight into surgical patients' perceptions of handover communications between doctors, incorporating patient and public involvement to enhance accessibility and understanding.

Methods: A cross-sectional, mixed-methods survey was developed with patient and public involvement and distributed to general surgery patients in two University Teaching Hospitals between 24 October 2023 and 21 July 2024. Comparative analyses of quantitative data were performed using McNemar's test for paired nominal data and Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous data. Free-text responses underwent thematic analysis to validate and expand on quantitative findings. Patient and public involvement partners contributed to study design, methodology, and the final manuscript.

Results: In total, 208 responses were received (52.3%). Significantly more patients reported having prior knowledge of nursing handovers (73.1%) compared to doctors' handovers (63.9%; x2 = 14.53, p = 0.0002). Patient perceptions of the handover process were generally positive; although satisfaction declined significantly with weekend handovers (p < 0.05). Thematic analysis identified four themes: (1) the impact of poor inter-professional communication, (2) the importance of teamwork, (3) external factors influencing handover effectiveness, and (4) patient nonchalance about their care. The use of patient and public involvement in this study improved survey accessibility and understanding of the concept and importance of handover.

Conclusions: This study shows limited prior awareness of handover between doctors among surgical patients, especially the potential hazards that can arise if performed poorly. Patient and public involvement improved accessibility and understanding of the topic; however, challenges such as adequate training for meaningful engagement remain.

病人对手术交接质量的看法:一项混合方法的调查。
背景:医院内病人护理的交接是一项必要但高风险的专业活动,对病人来说往往缺乏透明度。这项调查的目的是了解外科病人对医生之间的交接沟通的看法,并结合病人和公众的参与,以提高可及性和理解。方法:于2023年10月24日至2024年7月21日期间,在患者和公众的参与下,对两所大学教学医院的普外科患者进行了横断面、混合方法调查。定量数据的比较分析采用成对标称数据的McNemar检验和连续数据的Wilcoxon秩和检验。对自由文本答复进行专题分析,以验证和扩展定量结果。患者和公众参与伙伴对研究设计、方法和最终手稿做出了贡献。结果:共收到回复208份(52.3%)。与医生交接(63.9%)相比,更多的患者报告说他们事先知道护理交接(73.1%);X2 = 14.53, p = 0.0002)。患者对交接过程的看法总体上是积极的;结论:这项研究表明,手术患者对医生之间交接的事先意识有限,特别是如果表现不佳可能产生的潜在危险。患者和公众的参与改善了对该主题的可及性和理解;然而,诸如为有意义的参与提供充分培训等挑战仍然存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信