Multidomain postoperative recovery trajectories after lumbar and thoracolumbar spine surgery.

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Salim Yakdan, Jingwen Zhang, Braeden Benedict, Ziqi Xu, Saad Javeed, Justin K Zhang, Benjamin A Steel, Vivek P Gupta, Kathleen Botterbush, Jay F Piccirillo, Thomas L Rodebaugh, Burel R Goodin, Jacob M Buchowski, Brian Neuman, Daniel Hafez, Michael Kelly, Wilson Z Ray, Chenyang Lu, Madelyn Frumkin, Jacob K Greenberg
{"title":"Multidomain postoperative recovery trajectories after lumbar and thoracolumbar spine surgery.","authors":"Salim Yakdan, Jingwen Zhang, Braeden Benedict, Ziqi Xu, Saad Javeed, Justin K Zhang, Benjamin A Steel, Vivek P Gupta, Kathleen Botterbush, Jay F Piccirillo, Thomas L Rodebaugh, Burel R Goodin, Jacob M Buchowski, Brian Neuman, Daniel Hafez, Michael Kelly, Wilson Z Ray, Chenyang Lu, Madelyn Frumkin, Jacob K Greenberg","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2025.05.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Understanding early postoperative recovery is crucial for improving perioperative care and long-term outcomes. Traditional recovery assessments relying primarily on cross-sectional patient-reported measures may not fully capture the complexity of the recovery process.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Our study evaluates early postoperative recovery using mobile health assessment and explores the relationship between early recovery patterns, multidomain recovery, and long-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>A prospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>A total of 129 patients were included in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of pain, physical function, and disability at 1, 6 and 12 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study recruited patients aged 21 to 85 undergoing lumbar/thoracolumbar surgery for degenerative diseases. During the first month postoperatively, patients completed daily Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) surveys assessing pain, depression, and physical function and were passively monitored with Fitbit. EMA and Fitbit data (steps per minute, Maximum 30-minute cadence, and activity bout number) were clustered using functional principal component analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>129 patients were included (median age: 62; 56% female). Two dominant recovery patterns were identified across all domains. At 12 months, patients with more favorable recovery across all domains except for activity bout number and depression, showed better outcomes. Favorable recovery in pain intensity and steps per minute was associated with greater improvements in all outcomes, while favorable recovery in maximum 30-minute cadence was associated with greater improvement in disability and physical function. Patients with less favorable pain recovery had a significantly higher complication rate (23% vs. 7%). A greater number of favorable recovery domains was associated with better 12-month outcomes improvement and demonstrated superior prognostic value compared to traditional patient assessment methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early postoperative recovery patterns and multidomain recovery, captured using mHealth tools, provide valuable insights into long-term outcomes. With further validation, these findings highlight the potential of integrating mHealth into clinical practice to personalize rehabilitation strategies, improve resource allocation, and enhance patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2025.05.017","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background context: Understanding early postoperative recovery is crucial for improving perioperative care and long-term outcomes. Traditional recovery assessments relying primarily on cross-sectional patient-reported measures may not fully capture the complexity of the recovery process.

Purpose: Our study evaluates early postoperative recovery using mobile health assessment and explores the relationship between early recovery patterns, multidomain recovery, and long-term outcomes.

Study design/setting: A prospective observational study.

Patient sample: A total of 129 patients were included in the analysis.

Outcome measures: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of pain, physical function, and disability at 1, 6 and 12 months postoperatively.

Methods: This study recruited patients aged 21 to 85 undergoing lumbar/thoracolumbar surgery for degenerative diseases. During the first month postoperatively, patients completed daily Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) surveys assessing pain, depression, and physical function and were passively monitored with Fitbit. EMA and Fitbit data (steps per minute, Maximum 30-minute cadence, and activity bout number) were clustered using functional principal component analysis.

Results: 129 patients were included (median age: 62; 56% female). Two dominant recovery patterns were identified across all domains. At 12 months, patients with more favorable recovery across all domains except for activity bout number and depression, showed better outcomes. Favorable recovery in pain intensity and steps per minute was associated with greater improvements in all outcomes, while favorable recovery in maximum 30-minute cadence was associated with greater improvement in disability and physical function. Patients with less favorable pain recovery had a significantly higher complication rate (23% vs. 7%). A greater number of favorable recovery domains was associated with better 12-month outcomes improvement and demonstrated superior prognostic value compared to traditional patient assessment methods.

Conclusion: Early postoperative recovery patterns and multidomain recovery, captured using mHealth tools, provide valuable insights into long-term outcomes. With further validation, these findings highlight the potential of integrating mHealth into clinical practice to personalize rehabilitation strategies, improve resource allocation, and enhance patient care.

腰椎和胸腰椎手术后的多域术后恢复轨迹。
背景背景:了解术后早期恢复对改善围手术期护理和长期预后至关重要。传统的恢复评估主要依赖于患者报告的横截面措施,可能无法完全反映恢复过程的复杂性。目的:我们的研究使用移动健康评估评估术后早期恢复,并探讨早期恢复模式、多领域恢复和长期预后之间的关系。研究设计/设置:前瞻性观察性研究。患者样本:共纳入129例患者。结果测量:术后1、6和12个月患者报告的疼痛、身体功能和残疾的结果测量(PROMs)。方法:本研究招募年龄21-85岁、因退行性疾病行腰椎/胸腰椎手术的患者。术后第一个月,患者完成每日生态瞬时评估(EMA)调查,评估疼痛、抑郁和身体功能,并接受Fitbit被动监测。EMA和Fitbit数据(每分钟步数,最大30分钟节奏和活动次数)使用功能主成分分析聚类。结果:纳入129例患者(中位年龄:62岁;56%的女性)。在所有领域确定了两种主要的恢复模式。在12个月时,除了活动量和抑郁外,在所有领域恢复良好的患者表现出更好的结果。疼痛强度和每分钟步数的良好恢复与所有结果的更大改善有关,而最大30分钟节奏的良好恢复与残疾和身体功能的更大改善有关。疼痛恢复较差的患者并发症发生率明显较高(23% vs 7%)。与传统的患者评估方法相比,更多的有利恢复域与更好的12个月预后改善相关,并显示出更好的预后价值。结论:使用移动健康工具捕获的早期术后恢复模式和多域恢复为长期结果提供了有价值的见解。通过进一步验证,这些发现强调了将移动健康整合到临床实践中的潜力,以个性化康复策略,改善资源分配,并加强患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信