The Nature of Interprofessional Collaboration between Radiation Therapists and Radiation Oncologists in The South African Setting.

Q4 Medicine
Marlene Coetzee, Germaine Lovric, Julius Thambura
{"title":"The Nature of Interprofessional Collaboration between Radiation Therapists and Radiation Oncologists in The South African Setting.","authors":"Marlene Coetzee, Germaine Lovric, Julius Thambura","doi":"10.3138/cam-2024-0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to explore the nature of interprofessional collaboration between radiation therapists (RTTs) and radiation oncologists (ROs) during radiation therapy (RT), with the shared goal of treating patients with radiation. Generally, there seems to be a lack of studies describing the nature of interprofessional collaboration between RTTs and ROs. The present study adopts an exploratory descriptive qualitative research design. The setting is the private and public RT departments situated in the Tshwane municipal area, Gauteng, South Africa. A variation is noted between the Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA) scope of practice for RTTs, published in 1979, and the new scope circulated for comment in 2021. Practising RTTs and ROs have been invited to take part in semi-structured interviews by using expert purposive sampling. Ten radiation therapists and seven radiation oncologists were interviewed, and data analysis included content and thematic analysis. Two main themes emerging from the data were the dual purpose of collaborative communication and grappling with the collaborative communication divide. The findings indicate team structure issues, the fact that the two disciplines mostly work in separate locations, and the status of current communication being dominated by intermediaries are perceived by the participants to hinder collaborative communication between the two professional groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":39728,"journal":{"name":"Communication and Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e20240024"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/cam-2024-0024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to explore the nature of interprofessional collaboration between radiation therapists (RTTs) and radiation oncologists (ROs) during radiation therapy (RT), with the shared goal of treating patients with radiation. Generally, there seems to be a lack of studies describing the nature of interprofessional collaboration between RTTs and ROs. The present study adopts an exploratory descriptive qualitative research design. The setting is the private and public RT departments situated in the Tshwane municipal area, Gauteng, South Africa. A variation is noted between the Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA) scope of practice for RTTs, published in 1979, and the new scope circulated for comment in 2021. Practising RTTs and ROs have been invited to take part in semi-structured interviews by using expert purposive sampling. Ten radiation therapists and seven radiation oncologists were interviewed, and data analysis included content and thematic analysis. Two main themes emerging from the data were the dual purpose of collaborative communication and grappling with the collaborative communication divide. The findings indicate team structure issues, the fact that the two disciplines mostly work in separate locations, and the status of current communication being dominated by intermediaries are perceived by the participants to hinder collaborative communication between the two professional groups.

南非背景下放射治疗师和放射肿瘤学家跨专业合作的性质。
本研究旨在探讨放射治疗师(rtt)和放射肿瘤学家(ROs)在放射治疗(RT)期间的跨专业合作的本质,以治疗放射患者为共同目标。一般来说,似乎缺乏描述rtt和ro之间跨专业合作性质的研究。本研究采用探索性描述性质的研究设计。背景是位于南非豪登省Tshwane市区的私人和公共交通部门。注意到1979年发布的南非卫生专业委员会(HPCSA) rtt实践范围与2021年分发征求意见的新范围之间存在差异。执业执业执业治疗师和注册营养师已获邀请以专家有目的抽样的方式参加半结构化访谈。对10名放射治疗师和7名放射肿瘤学家进行访谈,数据分析包括内容分析和主题分析。从数据中出现的两个主要主题是协作通信的双重目的和解决协作通信鸿沟。研究结果表明,团队结构问题,两个学科大多在不同的地点工作的事实,以及当前由中介主导的沟通状态,被参与者认为阻碍了两个专业群体之间的协作沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Communication and Medicine
Communication and Medicine Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Communication & Medicine continues to abide by the following distinctive aims: • To consolidate different traditions of discourse and communication research in its commitment to an understanding of psychosocial, cultural and ethical aspects of healthcare in contemporary societies. • To cover the different specialities within medicine and allied healthcare studies. • To underscore the significance of specific areas and themes by bringing out special issues from time to time. • To be fully committed to publishing evidence-based, data-driven original studies with practical application and relevance as key guiding principles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信