Willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in Pakistan: implications for health policy.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Faizur Rehman, Muhammad Wasay Shahid, Mehran Riaz, Malik Muhammad Umair, Farah Azhar, Muhammad Amer, Ali Ahmed
{"title":"Willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in Pakistan: implications for health policy.","authors":"Faizur Rehman, Muhammad Wasay Shahid, Mehran Riaz, Malik Muhammad Umair, Farah Azhar, Muhammad Amer, Ali Ahmed","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2025.2504945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Allocating healthcare resources in developing countries like Pakistan is constrained by economic limitations and uneven distribution. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to investigate the Willingness to Pay (WTP) for one additional Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY) among the general population in Pakistan to establish contextually relevant thresholds for health technology assessment (HTA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional survey using the convenient sampling technique to estimate the WTP for one additional QALY among the general population of Pakistan. The contingent valuation method (CVM) using the payment card technique was used to assess its monetary value.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 600 participants participated in the survey and resulted in 1200 WTP responses for further analysis. The mean WTP/QALY was 114,006.4 Pakistani rupee (PKR) (United States Dollar 410.11), equivalent to 0.29 times Pakistan's GDP per capita. The WTP/QALY for the quality-of-life improvement scenario was lower than the life-extension scenario. The two-part regression model showed that higher education and income were positively associated with WTP value.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides empirical evidence of the monetary value of one additional QALY from a sample of the Pakistani population. These findings highlight country-specific cost-effectiveness benchmarks, and incorporating WTP insights into the healthcare policy for better resource allocation, affordability, and long-term sustainability of the interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"967-975"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2025.2504945","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Allocating healthcare resources in developing countries like Pakistan is constrained by economic limitations and uneven distribution. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to investigate the Willingness to Pay (WTP) for one additional Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY) among the general population in Pakistan to establish contextually relevant thresholds for health technology assessment (HTA).

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey using the convenient sampling technique to estimate the WTP for one additional QALY among the general population of Pakistan. The contingent valuation method (CVM) using the payment card technique was used to assess its monetary value.

Results: A total of 600 participants participated in the survey and resulted in 1200 WTP responses for further analysis. The mean WTP/QALY was 114,006.4 Pakistani rupee (PKR) (United States Dollar 410.11), equivalent to 0.29 times Pakistan's GDP per capita. The WTP/QALY for the quality-of-life improvement scenario was lower than the life-extension scenario. The two-part regression model showed that higher education and income were positively associated with WTP value.

Conclusion: This study provides empirical evidence of the monetary value of one additional QALY from a sample of the Pakistani population. These findings highlight country-specific cost-effectiveness benchmarks, and incorporating WTP insights into the healthcare policy for better resource allocation, affordability, and long-term sustainability of the interventions.

巴基斯坦支付质量调整生命年(QALY)的意愿:对卫生政策的影响。
目标:在巴基斯坦等发展中国家分配医疗资源受到经济限制和分配不均的制约。因此,在本研究中,我们旨在调查巴基斯坦普通人群中额外一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的支付意愿(WTP),以建立与卫生技术评估(HTA)相关的背景阈值。方法:我们使用方便的抽样技术进行了横断面调查,以估计巴基斯坦普通人群中另一个QALY的WTP。采用支付卡技术的条件估值法(CVM)对其货币价值进行评估。结果:共有600名参与者参与了调查,并产生了1200份WTP反馈供进一步分析。平均WTP/QALY为114,006.4巴基斯坦卢比(PKR)(410.11美元),相当于巴基斯坦人均GDP的0.29倍。生活质量改善方案的WTP/QALY低于延长寿命方案。两部分回归模型显示,高等教育和收入与WTP值呈正相关。结论:本研究从巴基斯坦人口样本中提供了一个额外QALY的货币价值的经验证据。这些研究结果突出了具体国家的成本效益基准,并将WTP的见解纳入医疗保健政策,以更好地分配资源、提高可负担性和长期可持续性干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review. The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信