Donation after circulatory death; cholangiopathy in the machine age.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 TRANSPLANTATION
Ian S Currie, Fiona M Hunt
{"title":"Donation after circulatory death; cholangiopathy in the machine age.","authors":"Ian S Currie, Fiona M Hunt","doi":"10.1097/MOT.0000000000001222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Published work evaluating machine perfusion of DCD (donation after circulatory death) liver grafts in situ and ex situ is rapidly evolving, with several landmark studies published in the last 6 months. The central question in DCD liver transplant remains; which strategies most effectively reduce cholangiopathy? This condition, which results in repeated hospital admissions, interventions, re-transplantation and death, is a major deterrent to DCD utilization. This review considers current evidence in the mitigation of transplant cholangiopathy by machine perfusion in DCD liver grafts.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Studies which directly address DCD cholangiopathy as a primary outcome are few in number, despite their critical importance. In systematic reviews, Normothermic Regional Perfusion and Hypothermic Machine Perfusion consistently and significantly reduce transplant cholangiopathy rates. By contrast, the efficacy of Normothermic Machine Perfusion performed at donor or recipient centres is less well described and cautious interpretation is required. The most recent development, namely hypothermic followed by normothermic perfusion, has only now appeared in the literature but appears to offer advantages compared to either technology alone.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>To reduce DCD cholangiopathy, current data best support the use of donor centre NRP or recipient centre HMP. However, utilization is also improved when warm perfusion is involved.</p>","PeriodicalId":10900,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"337-343"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12237138/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOT.0000000000001222","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Published work evaluating machine perfusion of DCD (donation after circulatory death) liver grafts in situ and ex situ is rapidly evolving, with several landmark studies published in the last 6 months. The central question in DCD liver transplant remains; which strategies most effectively reduce cholangiopathy? This condition, which results in repeated hospital admissions, interventions, re-transplantation and death, is a major deterrent to DCD utilization. This review considers current evidence in the mitigation of transplant cholangiopathy by machine perfusion in DCD liver grafts.

Recent findings: Studies which directly address DCD cholangiopathy as a primary outcome are few in number, despite their critical importance. In systematic reviews, Normothermic Regional Perfusion and Hypothermic Machine Perfusion consistently and significantly reduce transplant cholangiopathy rates. By contrast, the efficacy of Normothermic Machine Perfusion performed at donor or recipient centres is less well described and cautious interpretation is required. The most recent development, namely hypothermic followed by normothermic perfusion, has only now appeared in the literature but appears to offer advantages compared to either technology alone.

Summary: To reduce DCD cholangiopathy, current data best support the use of donor centre NRP or recipient centre HMP. However, utilization is also improved when warm perfusion is involved.

循环性死亡后捐赠;机器时代的胆管病。
综述目的:已发表的评估原位和非原位DCD(循环死亡后捐赠)肝移植机器灌注的工作正在迅速发展,在过去6个月中发表了几项具有里程碑意义的研究。DCD肝移植的核心问题仍然存在;哪些策略最有效地减少胆管病?这种情况导致反复住院、干预、再次移植和死亡,是对双氯胺酮使用的主要阻碍。本文综述了目前在DCD肝移植中通过机器灌注减轻移植胆管病变的证据。最近的发现:直接将DCD胆管病作为主要结局的研究数量很少,尽管它们非常重要。在系统综述中,常温区域灌注和低温机器灌注一致且显著降低移植胆管病发生率。相比之下,在供体或受体中心进行的恒温机器灌注的疗效描述较少,需要谨慎解释。最近的发展,即低温后的恒温灌注,现在才出现在文献中,但与单独使用这两种技术相比,似乎具有优势。摘要:为了减少DCD胆管病,目前的数据最支持使用供体中心NRP或受体中心HMP。然而,当涉及热灌注时,利用率也得到提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation is an indispensable resource featuring key, up-to-date and important advances in the field from around the world. Led by renowned guest editors for each section, every bimonthly issue of Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation delivers a fresh insight into topics such as stem cell transplantation, immunosuppression, tolerance induction and organ preservation and procurement. With 18 sections in total, the journal provides a convenient and thorough review of the field and will be of interest to researchers, surgeons and other healthcare professionals alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信