{"title":"The Impact of Racial/Ethnic Concordance in Patient-Reported Shared Decision-Making and Communication During the COVID-19 Era.","authors":"J B Eyring, Brandon M Hemeyer, Fernando A Wilson","doi":"10.1097/MLR.0000000000002165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient-provider racial/ethnic concordance may mitigate disparities, which is likely due in part to improved communication. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated disparities and raised questions on communication, warranting further exploration to inform equitable care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the influence of patient-provider racial/ethnic concordance on patient-reported shared decision-making and communication during the early stages of the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>Stepwise logit models were constructed of short-term non-modifiable factors (race/ethnicity, education, age, marital status), modifiable factors (health insurance, poverty status), and self-reported health status predicting communication outcomes-whether the provider included the patient in decision-making and communicated treatment options.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Adults from the 2020 US Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (N=9634), weighted consistent with complex sampling.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>Shared decision-making and communication of treatment options by the primary care provider were assessed by patient surveys. Demographic characteristics included race/ethnicity, poverty status, age, marital status, education, and insurance status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Concordance was associated with greater age and socioeconomic status, and being married, White, and in good health. Concordance was associated with patient-reported shared decision-making and communication of treatment options. The associations between demographic characteristics and communication outcomes differed significantly by concordance status, which further differed by race/ethnicity. For example, shared decision-making was predicted by education for discordant Hispanic patients and marital status for discordant White patients, but neither were predictive among concordant patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest a potential association between concordance on shared decision-making and communication dynamics, emphasizing the need for additional research to clarify how similarities and differences may influence health care interactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":18364,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care","volume":" ","pages":"579-587"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002165","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Patient-provider racial/ethnic concordance may mitigate disparities, which is likely due in part to improved communication. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated disparities and raised questions on communication, warranting further exploration to inform equitable care.
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the influence of patient-provider racial/ethnic concordance on patient-reported shared decision-making and communication during the early stages of the pandemic.
Research design: Stepwise logit models were constructed of short-term non-modifiable factors (race/ethnicity, education, age, marital status), modifiable factors (health insurance, poverty status), and self-reported health status predicting communication outcomes-whether the provider included the patient in decision-making and communicated treatment options.
Subjects: Adults from the 2020 US Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (N=9634), weighted consistent with complex sampling.
Measures: Shared decision-making and communication of treatment options by the primary care provider were assessed by patient surveys. Demographic characteristics included race/ethnicity, poverty status, age, marital status, education, and insurance status.
Results: Concordance was associated with greater age and socioeconomic status, and being married, White, and in good health. Concordance was associated with patient-reported shared decision-making and communication of treatment options. The associations between demographic characteristics and communication outcomes differed significantly by concordance status, which further differed by race/ethnicity. For example, shared decision-making was predicted by education for discordant Hispanic patients and marital status for discordant White patients, but neither were predictive among concordant patients.
Conclusions: The findings suggest a potential association between concordance on shared decision-making and communication dynamics, emphasizing the need for additional research to clarify how similarities and differences may influence health care interactions.
期刊介绍:
Rated as one of the top ten journals in healthcare administration, Medical Care is devoted to all aspects of the administration and delivery of healthcare. This scholarly journal publishes original, peer-reviewed papers documenting the most current developments in the rapidly changing field of healthcare. This timely journal reports on the findings of original investigations into issues related to the research, planning, organization, financing, provision, and evaluation of health services.