Long-term outcomes of out-of-center veno-arterial ECMO cannulation for cardiopulmonary failure: investigation of prognostic parameters for a decision support tool - a 16-year retrospective study.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Walter Petermichl, Alois Philipp, Maik Foltan, Andrea Stadlbauer, Peter-Paul Ellmauer, Christian Merten, Sebastian Blecha, Thomas Müller, Bernhard Ulm, Bernhard Graf, Dirk Lunz
{"title":"Long-term outcomes of out-of-center veno-arterial ECMO cannulation for cardiopulmonary failure: investigation of prognostic parameters for a decision support tool - a 16-year retrospective study.","authors":"Walter Petermichl, Alois Philipp, Maik Foltan, Andrea Stadlbauer, Peter-Paul Ellmauer, Christian Merten, Sebastian Blecha, Thomas Müller, Bernhard Ulm, Bernhard Graf, Dirk Lunz","doi":"10.1186/s13049-025-01401-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) has served as a crucial intervention for critically ill patients with persistent cardiopulmonary failure. A standardized approach improves VA ECMO outcomes, which is why ECMO is currently limited to specialized centers. However, transferring critically ill patients to these ECMO centers is not without risk. Portable ECMO devices allow implantation in out-of-center settings prior to transportation. Despite efforts to standardize decision-making, significant variability remains, particularly in out-of-center (OoC) settings with limited data. Due to persistently high mortality, accurate indications are needed to optimize outcomes. This study aims to identify key factors associated with favorable outcomes in OoC VA ECMO and to develop practical decision-making tools for clinicians in these settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively investigated the outcomes of VA ECMO implantation in out-of-center settings between 2006 and 2022 at our institution. Parameters assessed prior to VA ECMO implantation, including organ failure count, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and laboratory data, were analyzed. Follow-up data were collected to evaluate functional (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] performance status) and neurological (cerebral performance category score [CPC]) (outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed using non-parametric methods and SHAP importance analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 56.5% (195 of 345 patients) who underwent VA ECMO implantation in OoC survived, and 43.8% had a favorable neurological outcome (CPC 1). 37.6% of patients had good functional outcomes (ECOG 0-1). Patients with a MAP > 54 mmHg had better long-term functional outcomes, and those with a MAP > 64 mmHg had better mid-term neurological outcomes. Poor outcomes were associated with reduced coagulation activity and increased thrombogenicity. Renal and multi-organ failure prior to VA ECMO implantation were associated with poor neurological and functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Through importance analyses, we identified key and secondary factors associated with favorable outcomes in OoC VA ECMO. The extent and severity of organ failure prior to VA ECMO implantation are crucial in determining outcomes. Hemodynamic status, as reflected by MAP, along with organ failure prior to VA-ECMO implantation, significantly influences neurological and functional outcomes. Patients with better hemodynamic stability and coagulation profiles had significantly improved chances of survival with favorable neurological and functional outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49292,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","volume":"33 1","pages":"81"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12070683/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-025-01401-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) has served as a crucial intervention for critically ill patients with persistent cardiopulmonary failure. A standardized approach improves VA ECMO outcomes, which is why ECMO is currently limited to specialized centers. However, transferring critically ill patients to these ECMO centers is not without risk. Portable ECMO devices allow implantation in out-of-center settings prior to transportation. Despite efforts to standardize decision-making, significant variability remains, particularly in out-of-center (OoC) settings with limited data. Due to persistently high mortality, accurate indications are needed to optimize outcomes. This study aims to identify key factors associated with favorable outcomes in OoC VA ECMO and to develop practical decision-making tools for clinicians in these settings.

Methods: We retrospectively investigated the outcomes of VA ECMO implantation in out-of-center settings between 2006 and 2022 at our institution. Parameters assessed prior to VA ECMO implantation, including organ failure count, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and laboratory data, were analyzed. Follow-up data were collected to evaluate functional (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] performance status) and neurological (cerebral performance category score [CPC]) (outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed using non-parametric methods and SHAP importance analysis.

Results: A total of 56.5% (195 of 345 patients) who underwent VA ECMO implantation in OoC survived, and 43.8% had a favorable neurological outcome (CPC 1). 37.6% of patients had good functional outcomes (ECOG 0-1). Patients with a MAP > 54 mmHg had better long-term functional outcomes, and those with a MAP > 64 mmHg had better mid-term neurological outcomes. Poor outcomes were associated with reduced coagulation activity and increased thrombogenicity. Renal and multi-organ failure prior to VA ECMO implantation were associated with poor neurological and functional outcomes.

Conclusions: Through importance analyses, we identified key and secondary factors associated with favorable outcomes in OoC VA ECMO. The extent and severity of organ failure prior to VA ECMO implantation are crucial in determining outcomes. Hemodynamic status, as reflected by MAP, along with organ failure prior to VA-ECMO implantation, significantly influences neurological and functional outcomes. Patients with better hemodynamic stability and coagulation profiles had significantly improved chances of survival with favorable neurological and functional outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

中心外静脉-动脉ECMO插管治疗心肺衰竭的长期结果:决策支持工具预后参数的调查-一项16年回顾性研究
背景:静脉-动脉体外膜氧合(VA ECMO)已成为重症持续性心肺衰竭患者的重要干预手段。标准化的方法提高了VA ECMO的结果,这就是ECMO目前仅限于专业中心的原因。然而,将危重患者转移到这些ECMO中心并非没有风险。便携式ECMO设备允许在运输前在中心外设置植入。尽管努力使决策标准化,但显著的可变性仍然存在,特别是在数据有限的离中心(OoC)设置中。由于持续的高死亡率,需要准确的指征来优化结果。本研究旨在确定与OoC VA ECMO有利结果相关的关键因素,并为这些情况下的临床医生开发实用的决策工具。方法:我们回顾性调查了2006年至2022年在我院中心外设置的VA ECMO植入的结果。分析VA ECMO植入前评估的参数,包括器官衰竭计数、平均动脉压(MAP)和实验室数据。收集随访数据以评估功能(东部肿瘤合作组[ECOG]表现状态)和神经(大脑表现类别评分[CPC])(结局)。采用非参数方法和SHAP重要性分析进行统计分析。结果:345例患者中有195例(56.5%)的患者在OoC中植入了VA ECMO,其中43.8%的患者神经系统预后良好(CPC 1), 37.6%的患者功能预后良好(ECOG 0-1)。MAP > 54 mmHg的患者有较好的长期功能预后,MAP > 64 mmHg的患者有较好的中期神经预后。不良结果与凝血活性降低和血栓形成性增加有关。VA ECMO植入前的肾脏和多器官衰竭与不良的神经和功能预后相关。结论:通过重要性分析,我们确定了与OoC VA ECMO预后良好相关的关键因素和次要因素。VA ECMO植入前器官衰竭的程度和严重程度是决定预后的关键。MAP所反映的血流动力学状态,以及VA-ECMO植入前的器官衰竭,显著影响神经和功能预后。血液动力学稳定性和凝血状况较好的患者生存率显著提高,神经和功能预后良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The primary topics of interest in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine (SJTREM) are the pre-hospital and early in-hospital diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of emergency medicine, trauma, and resuscitation. Contributions focusing on dispatch, major incidents, etiology, pathophysiology, rehabilitation, epidemiology, prevention, education, training, implementation, work environment, as well as ethical and socio-economic aspects may also be assessed for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信