Resection of 4 or more pulmonary segments increases the risk of non-cancer-related mortality.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Takeo Nakada, Yu Suyama, Ai Otani, Yo Tsukamoto, Takamasa Shibazaki, Tomonari Kinoshita, Takashi Ohtsuka
{"title":"Resection of 4 or more pulmonary segments increases the risk of non-cancer-related mortality.","authors":"Takeo Nakada, Yu Suyama, Ai Otani, Yo Tsukamoto, Takamasa Shibazaki, Tomonari Kinoshita, Takashi Ohtsuka","doi":"10.1093/ejcts/ezaf162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study retrospectively analysed the effect of the number of resected pulmonary segments on surgical outcomes of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer undergoing anatomical pulmonary resection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined patients who underwent lobectomy or segmentectomy for non-small-cell lung cancer between January 2016 and June 2021. We compared the surgical outcomes between the ≤3 segment group (group A) and the ≥4 segment group (group B). Lung functions were evaluated by comparing the preoperative and 6-month postoperative periods. Comprehensive preoperative status, including osteoporosis, sarcopenia and lung function, was incorporated into the propensity score matching analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Propensity score matching for 420 patients yielded 310 for evaluation (1:1 matching), with a median follow-up of 57.6 months. Fifty-four patients (17.5%) died (17 from lung cancer and 37 from other diseases), and 50 patients (16.1%) experienced cancer recurrence. The 2 groups had no significant differences in surgical outcomes, including operation time, blood loss and postoperative complications. However, group B showed the worst reduction in vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (all P < 0.05). Additionally, there were no significant differences in cancer recurrence or lung cancer mortality between the groups, although group B was significantly associated with increased deaths from other causes (P = 0.007, Gray's test; adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio 2.392; 95% confidence interval 1.170-5.167). Subgroup analyses revealed adverse effect modification in male patients regarding non-cancer-related deaths (P-value for interaction = 0.044).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ≥4 segment group exhibited poorer postoperative pulmonary function and more deaths from other causes, indicating the need for careful postoperative management.</p>","PeriodicalId":11938,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezaf162","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study retrospectively analysed the effect of the number of resected pulmonary segments on surgical outcomes of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer undergoing anatomical pulmonary resection.

Methods: We examined patients who underwent lobectomy or segmentectomy for non-small-cell lung cancer between January 2016 and June 2021. We compared the surgical outcomes between the ≤3 segment group (group A) and the ≥4 segment group (group B). Lung functions were evaluated by comparing the preoperative and 6-month postoperative periods. Comprehensive preoperative status, including osteoporosis, sarcopenia and lung function, was incorporated into the propensity score matching analysis.

Results: Propensity score matching for 420 patients yielded 310 for evaluation (1:1 matching), with a median follow-up of 57.6 months. Fifty-four patients (17.5%) died (17 from lung cancer and 37 from other diseases), and 50 patients (16.1%) experienced cancer recurrence. The 2 groups had no significant differences in surgical outcomes, including operation time, blood loss and postoperative complications. However, group B showed the worst reduction in vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (all P < 0.05). Additionally, there were no significant differences in cancer recurrence or lung cancer mortality between the groups, although group B was significantly associated with increased deaths from other causes (P = 0.007, Gray's test; adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio 2.392; 95% confidence interval 1.170-5.167). Subgroup analyses revealed adverse effect modification in male patients regarding non-cancer-related deaths (P-value for interaction = 0.044).

Conclusions: The ≥4 segment group exhibited poorer postoperative pulmonary function and more deaths from other causes, indicating the need for careful postoperative management.

切除四个或更多肺段会增加非癌症相关死亡的风险。
目的:本研究回顾性分析解剖性肺切除术对非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者手术效果的影响。方法:我们调查了2016年1月至2021年6月期间接受非小细胞肺癌肺叶切除术或节段切除术的患者。我们比较≤3节段组(A组)和≥4节段组(B组)的手术效果。比较术前和术后6个月肺功能。综合术前状态,包括骨质疏松症、肌肉减少症和肺功能,纳入倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析。结果:420例PSM患者中有310例(1:1匹配),中位随访时间为57.6个月。死亡54例(17.5%),其中肺癌17例,其他疾病37例,癌症复发50例(16.1%)。两组在手术时间、出血量、术后并发症等手术结果上无显著差异。结论:≥4节段组术后肺功能较差,其他原因死亡较多,需要谨慎的术后处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
564
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The primary aim of the European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery is to provide a medium for the publication of high-quality original scientific reports documenting progress in cardiac and thoracic surgery. The journal publishes reports of significant clinical and experimental advances related to surgery of the heart, the great vessels and the chest. The European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery is an international journal and accepts submissions from all regions. The journal is supported by a number of leading European societies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信