{"title":"Effects of Spinal Immobilization with Backboard at 20 Degrees on Pain and Discomfort Levels","authors":"Sedat Akkan MD, Seda Dağar MD, Emine Emektar MD, Şeref Kerem Çorbacioğlu MD, Hüseyin Uzunosmanoglu MD, Handan Özen Olcay MD, Zeynep Saral Öztürk MD, Yunsur Çevik MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jemermed.2025.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Although spinal immobilization (SI) in the form of reverse Trendelenburg at a 20-degree angle has been shown to reduce undesirable side effects, such as decreased respiratory function seen with 0-degree SI, concerns exist that SI at 20 degrees might increase pain and discomfort, particularly in the lower body, because of gravity.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aims to evaluate whether SI at a 20-degree angle results in different levels of pain and discomfort in various body regions compared to SI at a 0-degree angle.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This experimental study was conducted with healthy adult volunteers aged 25 to 45 years who had no chronic illnesses or obesity (body mass index <30). Each volunteer underwent two separate immobilization sessions on different days: once at a 0-degree angle (0-degree group) and once at a 20-degree angle (20-degree group), each lasting 1 hour. Vital signs and pain/discomfort levels by visual analog scale (VAS) were recorded at baseline, 15, 30, and 60 min.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 51 volunteers participated in the study. While a statistically significant increase in pain and discomfort was observed over time in both the 0-degree and 20-degree groups, no statistically significant difference in VAS scores was found between the two groups at any time point.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Although SI at a 20-degree angle does not reduce the pain and discomfort associated with the 0-degree position, it also does not increase these symptoms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"73 ","pages":"Pages 80-86"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736467925000204","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Although spinal immobilization (SI) in the form of reverse Trendelenburg at a 20-degree angle has been shown to reduce undesirable side effects, such as decreased respiratory function seen with 0-degree SI, concerns exist that SI at 20 degrees might increase pain and discomfort, particularly in the lower body, because of gravity.
Objective
This study aims to evaluate whether SI at a 20-degree angle results in different levels of pain and discomfort in various body regions compared to SI at a 0-degree angle.
Methods
This experimental study was conducted with healthy adult volunteers aged 25 to 45 years who had no chronic illnesses or obesity (body mass index <30). Each volunteer underwent two separate immobilization sessions on different days: once at a 0-degree angle (0-degree group) and once at a 20-degree angle (20-degree group), each lasting 1 hour. Vital signs and pain/discomfort levels by visual analog scale (VAS) were recorded at baseline, 15, 30, and 60 min.
Results
A total of 51 volunteers participated in the study. While a statistically significant increase in pain and discomfort was observed over time in both the 0-degree and 20-degree groups, no statistically significant difference in VAS scores was found between the two groups at any time point.
Conclusion
Although SI at a 20-degree angle does not reduce the pain and discomfort associated with the 0-degree position, it also does not increase these symptoms.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Emergency Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to both the academic and practicing emergency physician. JEM, published monthly, contains research papers and clinical studies as well as articles focusing on the training of emergency physicians and on the practice of emergency medicine. The Journal features the following sections:
• Original Contributions
• Clinical Communications: Pediatric, Adult, OB/GYN
• Selected Topics: Toxicology, Prehospital Care, The Difficult Airway, Aeromedical Emergencies, Disaster Medicine, Cardiology Commentary, Emergency Radiology, Critical Care, Sports Medicine, Wound Care
• Techniques and Procedures
• Technical Tips
• Clinical Laboratory in Emergency Medicine
• Pharmacology in Emergency Medicine
• Case Presentations of the Harvard Emergency Medicine Residency
• Visual Diagnosis in Emergency Medicine
• Medical Classics
• Emergency Forum
• Editorial(s)
• Letters to the Editor
• Education
• Administration of Emergency Medicine
• International Emergency Medicine
• Computers in Emergency Medicine
• Violence: Recognition, Management, and Prevention
• Ethics
• Humanities and Medicine
• American Academy of Emergency Medicine
• AAEM Medical Student Forum
• Book and Other Media Reviews
• Calendar of Events
• Abstracts
• Trauma Reports
• Ultrasound in Emergency Medicine