Living Matter(s) for Learning: An International, Multi-Sited Ethnography Exploring How Surgeons' Learning Is Mediated Through the Use of Live Animal Simulation.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Perspectives on Medical Education Pub Date : 2025-04-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5334/pme.1762
Cara Swain, Charlotte Silén, Klas Karlgren
{"title":"Living Matter(s) for Learning: An International, Multi-Sited Ethnography Exploring How Surgeons' Learning Is Mediated Through the Use of Live Animal Simulation.","authors":"Cara Swain, Charlotte Silén, Klas Karlgren","doi":"10.5334/pme.1762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Surgical simulation training substituting a live animal for a human patient is a continuing practice. Despite clear ethical controversy, many perceive this type of simulation to be 'high fidelity' and therefore valuable. This study employs a sociomaterial perspective to explore how use of a live animal mediates learning activity and behaviour during a trauma surgical simulation course.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This international, focused ethnography generated data through observation of surgical simulation courses in six different countries. A narrative analysis was conducted using instrument-mediated learning theory as a lens for interpretation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The key finding is the dual and fluid existence of a live animal as an instrument for learning, variably perceived as a simulator tool for training and as a patient that must be saved. When framed as a tool, surgical knowledge and skills are practiced with learning acquired via epistemic and pragmatic mediation. Performing a thoracotomy denotes a critical moment; procedural unfamiliarity, evident haemorrhage and inherent risk of a deadly outcome contribute to uncertainty and clinical complexity. Learners are hence more likely to frame the animal as a patient. This experience has psychological fidelity, feeling more authentic as actions have consequences. Risk of failure to sustain the life of the animal mediates reflexive learning, teaching the learners about themselves and their abilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Live animal simulation training mediates surgical learning differently, dependent on whether the animal is framed as an instrument or as a patient. The animal's ability to bleed and exsanguinate to death creates risk and uncertainty as learners perform complex skills under pressure of significant consequence. Authenticity could be amplified if the animal is framed as a patient throughout the simulated learning event.</p>","PeriodicalId":48532,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Medical Education","volume":"14 1","pages":"181-193"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12023139/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.1762","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Surgical simulation training substituting a live animal for a human patient is a continuing practice. Despite clear ethical controversy, many perceive this type of simulation to be 'high fidelity' and therefore valuable. This study employs a sociomaterial perspective to explore how use of a live animal mediates learning activity and behaviour during a trauma surgical simulation course.

Methods: This international, focused ethnography generated data through observation of surgical simulation courses in six different countries. A narrative analysis was conducted using instrument-mediated learning theory as a lens for interpretation.

Results: The key finding is the dual and fluid existence of a live animal as an instrument for learning, variably perceived as a simulator tool for training and as a patient that must be saved. When framed as a tool, surgical knowledge and skills are practiced with learning acquired via epistemic and pragmatic mediation. Performing a thoracotomy denotes a critical moment; procedural unfamiliarity, evident haemorrhage and inherent risk of a deadly outcome contribute to uncertainty and clinical complexity. Learners are hence more likely to frame the animal as a patient. This experience has psychological fidelity, feeling more authentic as actions have consequences. Risk of failure to sustain the life of the animal mediates reflexive learning, teaching the learners about themselves and their abilities.

Conclusion: Live animal simulation training mediates surgical learning differently, dependent on whether the animal is framed as an instrument or as a patient. The animal's ability to bleed and exsanguinate to death creates risk and uncertainty as learners perform complex skills under pressure of significant consequence. Authenticity could be amplified if the animal is framed as a patient throughout the simulated learning event.

学习的生活物质:一个国际的,多地点的民族志探索外科医生如何通过使用活体动物模拟来调节学习。
手术模拟训练用活体动物代替人类病人是一项持续的实践。尽管存在明显的伦理争议,但许多人认为这种类型的模拟具有“高保真度”,因此很有价值。本研究采用社会材料的观点来探讨在创伤外科模拟课程中如何使用活体动物来调节学习活动和行为。方法:通过观察六个不同国家的外科模拟课程,这一国际性的、集中的人种学产生了数据。使用工具中介学习理论作为解释的镜头进行叙事分析。结果:关键发现是活的动物作为学习工具的双重和流体存在,作为训练的模拟器工具和必须拯救的病人。当作为一种工具,外科知识和技能是通过认知和实用调解获得的学习实践。进行开胸手术是一个关键时刻;手术不熟悉,明显出血和致命结果的固有风险导致不确定性和临床复杂性。因此,学习者更有可能将动物视为病人。这种体验具有心理保真度,当行为产生结果时感觉更加真实。无法维持动物生命的风险会促进反射性学习,让学习者了解自己和自己的能力。结论:活体动物模拟训练对手术学习的影响不同,这取决于动物是作为器械还是作为患者。当学习者在重大后果的压力下执行复杂技能时,动物流血和失血致死的能力会带来风险和不确定性。如果动物在整个模拟学习过程中被视为病人,真实性就会被放大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
31
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Perspectives on Medical Education mission is support and enrich collaborative scholarship between education researchers and clinical educators, and to advance new knowledge regarding clinical education practices. Official journal of the The Netherlands Association of Medical Education (NVMO). Perspectives on Medical Education is a non-profit Open Access journal with no charges for authors to submit or publish an article, and the full text of all articles is freely available immediately upon publication, thanks to the sponsorship of The Netherlands Association for Medical Education. Perspectives on Medical Education is highly visible thanks to its unrestricted online access policy. Perspectives on Medical Education positions itself at the dynamic intersection of educational research and clinical education. While other journals in the health professional education domain orient predominantly to education researchers or to clinical educators, Perspectives positions itself at the collaborative interface between these perspectives. This unique positioning reflects the journal’s mission to support and enrich collaborative scholarship between education researchers and clinical educators, and to advance new knowledge regarding clinical education practices. Reflecting this mission, the journal both welcomes original research papers arising from scholarly collaborations among clinicians, teachers and researchers and papers providing resources to develop the community’s ability to conduct such collaborative research. The journal’s audience includes researchers and practitioners: researchers who wish to explore challenging questions of health professions education and clinical teachers who wish to both advance their practice and envision for themselves a collaborative role in scholarly educational innovation. This audience of researchers, clinicians and educators is both international and interdisciplinary. The journal has a long history. In 1982, the journal was founded by the Dutch Association for Medical Education, as a Dutch language journal (Netherlands Journal of Medical Education). As a Dutch journal it fuelled educational research and innovation in the Netherlands. It is one of the factors for the Dutch success in medical education. In 2012, it widened its scope, transforming into an international English language journal. The journal swiftly became international in all aspects: the readers, authors, reviewers and editorial board members. The editorial board members represent the different parental disciplines in the field of medical education, e.g. clinicians, social scientists, biomedical scientists, statisticians and linguists. Several of them are leading scholars. Three of the editors are in the top ten of most cited authors in the medical education field. Two editors were awarded the Karolinska Institute Prize for Research. Presently, Erik Driessen leads the journal as Editor in Chief. Perspectives on Medical Education is highly visible thanks to its unrestricted online access policy. It is sponsored by theThe Netherlands Association of Medical Education and offers free manuscript submission. Perspectives on Medical Education positions itself at the dynamic intersection of educational research and clinical education. While other journals in the health professional education domain orient predominantly to education researchers or to clinical educators, Perspectives positions itself at the collaborative interface between these perspectives. This unique positioning reflects the journal’s mission to support and enrich collaborative scholarship between education researchers and clinical educators, and to advance new knowledge regarding clinical education practices. Reflecting this mission, the journal both welcomes original research papers arising from scholarly collaborations among clinicians, teachers and researchers and papers providing resources to develop the community’s ability to conduct such collaborative research. The journal’s audience includes researchers and practitioners: researchers who wish to explore challenging questions of health professions education and clinical teachers who wish to both advance their practice and envision for themselves a collaborative role in scholarly educational innovation. This audience of researchers, clinicians and educators is both international and interdisciplinary. The journal has a long history. In 1982, the journal was founded by the Dutch Association for Medical Education, as a Dutch language journal (Netherlands Journal of Medical Education). As a Dutch journal it fuelled educational research and innovation in the Netherlands. It is one of the factors for the Dutch success in medical education. In 2012, it widened its scope, transforming into an international English language journal. The journal swiftly became international in all aspects: the readers, authors, reviewers and editorial board members. The editorial board members represent the different parental disciplines in the field of medical education, e.g. clinicians, social scientists, biomedical scientists, statisticians and linguists. Several of them are leading scholars. Three of the editors are in the top ten of most cited authors in the medical education field. Two editors were awarded the Karolinska Institute Prize for Research. Presently, Erik Driessen leads the journal as Editor in Chief. Perspectives on Medical Education is highly visible thanks to its unrestricted online access policy. It is sponsored by theThe Netherlands Association of Medical Education and offers free manuscript submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信