Contrasting the contributions of 12S eDNA metabarcoding, visual surveys and anaesthetic collections to the historical regional diversity of cryptobenthic and conspicuous fish.

IF 1.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 FISHERIES
Camila Mac Loughlin, Tania Valdivia-Carrillo, Salwa El Khattabi, Fausto Valenzuela-Quiñonez, Hector Reyes-Bonilla, Adrian Munguia-Vega
{"title":"Contrasting the contributions of 12S eDNA metabarcoding, visual surveys and anaesthetic collections to the historical regional diversity of cryptobenthic and conspicuous fish.","authors":"Camila Mac Loughlin, Tania Valdivia-Carrillo, Salwa El Khattabi, Fausto Valenzuela-Quiñonez, Hector Reyes-Bonilla, Adrian Munguia-Vega","doi":"10.1111/jfb.70054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Taxonomic gaps in community biodiversity assessments are now commonly addressed by combining traditional monitoring methods and environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding, widely recognized for having the ability to uncover rare and cryptic diversity. However, only a few studies have assessed the efficacy of this novel technique for detecting cryptobenthic fishes and tested the limitations of incomplete genetic reference availability for a historically neglected component of fish communities. Our goals were (i) to compare cryptobenthic and conspicuous fish detections by 12S eDNA metabarcoding, visual surveys and anaesthetic fish collections, and (ii) to compare emerging regional diversity patterns against a long-term historical record for the Gulf of California. Despite adding new local references for 36 cryptobenthic fishes, 12S eDNA metabarcoding detected only seven taxa. Visual surveys provided similar results, highlighting fish collections as the primary source, with 57 cryptobenthic fishes recovered. Conspicuous fishes had an equal and highly complementary contribution by 12S eDNA and visual surveys. When combining contemporary detections from all methods, we recovered 43% of cryptobenthic and 16% of conspicuous fishes, relative to the historical records. The spatial community structure for detected cryptobenthic fishes differed from historical expectations and conspicuous fishes, showing no differences in community richness nor composition between Northern and Central Gulf communities. Our study highlights the limitations of eDNA for monitoring cryptobenthic fishes, and that their patterns of community structuring are driven by distinct factors compared to conspicuous fishes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15794,"journal":{"name":"Journal of fish biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of fish biology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.70054","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Taxonomic gaps in community biodiversity assessments are now commonly addressed by combining traditional monitoring methods and environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding, widely recognized for having the ability to uncover rare and cryptic diversity. However, only a few studies have assessed the efficacy of this novel technique for detecting cryptobenthic fishes and tested the limitations of incomplete genetic reference availability for a historically neglected component of fish communities. Our goals were (i) to compare cryptobenthic and conspicuous fish detections by 12S eDNA metabarcoding, visual surveys and anaesthetic fish collections, and (ii) to compare emerging regional diversity patterns against a long-term historical record for the Gulf of California. Despite adding new local references for 36 cryptobenthic fishes, 12S eDNA metabarcoding detected only seven taxa. Visual surveys provided similar results, highlighting fish collections as the primary source, with 57 cryptobenthic fishes recovered. Conspicuous fishes had an equal and highly complementary contribution by 12S eDNA and visual surveys. When combining contemporary detections from all methods, we recovered 43% of cryptobenthic and 16% of conspicuous fishes, relative to the historical records. The spatial community structure for detected cryptobenthic fishes differed from historical expectations and conspicuous fishes, showing no differences in community richness nor composition between Northern and Central Gulf communities. Our study highlights the limitations of eDNA for monitoring cryptobenthic fishes, and that their patterns of community structuring are driven by distinct factors compared to conspicuous fishes.

比较12S eDNA元条形码、视觉调查和麻醉采集对隐底动物和显眼鱼类历史区域多样性的贡献。
目前,社区生物多样性评估中的分类学空白通常通过将传统监测方法与环境DNA (eDNA)元条形码相结合来解决,环境DNA (eDNA)元条形码被广泛认为具有发现稀有和神秘多样性的能力。然而,只有少数研究评估了这种检测隐底栖鱼类的新技术的有效性,并测试了不完全遗传参考可用性对鱼类群落历史上被忽视的组成部分的局限性。我们的目标是(i)通过12S eDNA元条形码、视觉调查和麻醉鱼类收集来比较隐底生物和显眼鱼类的检测,以及(ii)将新出现的区域多样性模式与加利福尼亚湾的长期历史记录进行比较。尽管增加了36种隐底栖鱼类的本地参考资料,但12S eDNA元条形码仅检测到7个分类群。目视调查提供了类似的结果,强调鱼类是主要来源,有57种隐底栖鱼类被恢复。在12S eDNA和视觉调查中,显著鱼的贡献相等且高度互补。当结合所有方法的当代检测结果时,相对于历史记录,我们恢复了43%的隐底栖动物和16%的显眼鱼类。发现的隐底栖鱼类的空间群落结构与历史预期和显著鱼类不同,在群落丰富度和组成上北部和中部海湾之间没有差异。我们的研究强调了eDNA用于监测隐底栖鱼类的局限性,并且与显眼的鱼类相比,它们的群落结构模式是由不同的因素驱动的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of fish biology
Journal of fish biology 生物-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
292
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Fish Biology is a leading international journal for scientists engaged in all aspects of fishes and fisheries research, both fresh water and marine. The journal publishes high-quality papers relevant to the central theme of fish biology and aims to bring together under one cover an overall picture of the research in progress and to provide international communication among researchers in many disciplines with a common interest in the biology of fish.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信