Comparison of Humphrey 24-2 SITA Standard, SITA Fast, and SITA Faster Test Strategies in Patients with Glaucoma.

Q3 Medicine

Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-04-24 DOI:10.4274/tjo.galenos.2025.85666

Seher Köksaldı, Gül Arıkan, Ömer Faruk Dadaş, Üzeyir Günenç

{"title":"Comparison of Humphrey 24-2 SITA Standard, SITA Fast, and SITA Faster Test Strategies in Patients with Glaucoma.","authors":"Seher Köksaldı, Gül Arıkan, Ömer Faruk Dadaş, Üzeyir Günenç","doi":"10.4274/tjo.galenos.2025.85666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To compare 24-2 Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) Standard (SS), SITA Fast (SF), and SITA Faster (SFR) tests performed with Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA3 Model 840, Zeiss) in patients with glaucomatous visual field (VF) defect.Materials and methods: Total of 72 eyes of 72 patients with glaucomatous VF defects were included in the study. Test duration, mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), visual field index (VFI), and the width and depth of glaucomatous VF defect were compared among the three tests.Results: The most common diagnoses were primary open-angle glaucoma in 45 eyes (62.5%) and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma in 10 eyes (13.9%). Mean test durations for the SS, SF, and SFR tests were 420.38±53.87 s, 275.94±45.52 s, and 191.89±35.48 s, respectively. Test durations were found to be statistically significantly different in all three tests (p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the three tests in terms of MD, width, or depth of glaucomatous VF defect (p=0.211, p=0.762, and p=0.701, respectively). There was a statistically significant difference among the three tests in terms of VFI and PSD values (p=0.008 and p<0.001, respectively).Conclusion: Test duration was found to be shorter in the SFR test when compared to SS and SF tests. However, all three tests were similar in terms of the width and depth of the glaucomatous VF defect.","PeriodicalId":23373,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"55 2","pages":"67-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12035064/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2025.85666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare 24-2 Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) Standard (SS), SITA Fast (SF), and SITA Faster (SFR) tests performed with Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA3 Model 840, Zeiss) in patients with glaucomatous visual field (VF) defect.

Materials and methods: Total of 72 eyes of 72 patients with glaucomatous VF defects were included in the study. Test duration, mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), visual field index (VFI), and the width and depth of glaucomatous VF defect were compared among the three tests.

Results: The most common diagnoses were primary open-angle glaucoma in 45 eyes (62.5%) and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma in 10 eyes (13.9%). Mean test durations for the SS, SF, and SFR tests were 420.38±53.87 s, 275.94±45.52 s, and 191.89±35.48 s, respectively. Test durations were found to be statistically significantly different in all three tests (p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the three tests in terms of MD, width, or depth of glaucomatous VF defect (p=0.211, p=0.762, and p=0.701, respectively). There was a statistically significant difference among the three tests in terms of VFI and PSD values (p=0.008 and p<0.001, respectively).

Conclusion: Test duration was found to be shorter in the SFR test when compared to SS and SF tests. However, all three tests were similar in terms of the width and depth of the glaucomatous VF defect.

查看原文本刊更多论文

Humphrey 24-2 SITA Standard、SITA Fast和SITA Faster测试策略在青光眼患者中的比较

目的：比较使用Humphrey Field Analyzer （HFA3 Model 840，蔡司）对青光眼视野（VF）缺陷患者进行的24-2瑞典交互式阈值算法（SITA）标准（SS）、SITA Fast （SF）和SITA Faster （SFR）测试。材料与方法：选取青光眼型VF缺损患者72只眼。比较三种试验的测试时间、平均偏差（MD）、模式标准差（PSD）、视野指数（VFI）和青光眼VF缺损的宽度和深度。结果：原发性开角型青光眼45眼（62.5%），假性脱落型青光眼10眼（13.9%）。SS、SF和SFR测试的平均测试时间分别为420.38±53.87 s、275.94±45.52 s和191.89±35.48 s。试验持续时间在所有三种试验中均有统计学上的显著差异(p结论：与SS和SF试验相比，SFR试验的试验持续时间更短。然而，这三种测试在青光眼VF缺损的宽度和深度方面是相似的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology Medicine-Ophthalmology

CiteScore

2.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology (TJO) is the only scientific periodical publication of the Turkish Ophthalmological Association and has been published since January 1929. In its early years, the journal was published in Turkish and French. Although there were temporary interruptions in the publication of the journal due to various challenges, the Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology has been published continually from 1971 to the present. The target audience includes specialists and physicians in training in ophthalmology in all relevant disciplines.