Retrospective cohort study of oral switch versus intravenous antibiotics for carbapenem-resistant enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections on hospital discharge.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Pharmacotherapy Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-09 DOI:10.1002/phar.70012
Christen J Arena, Ali Abed, Rachel M Kenney, Geehan Suleyman, Anita Shallal, Susan L Davis, Michael P Veve
{"title":"Retrospective cohort study of oral switch versus intravenous antibiotics for carbapenem-resistant enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections on hospital discharge.","authors":"Christen J Arena, Ali Abed, Rachel M Kenney, Geehan Suleyman, Anita Shallal, Susan L Davis, Michael P Veve","doi":"10.1002/phar.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare outcomes of oral switch versus intravenous antibiotics for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) infections at hospital discharge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Institutional review board approved, retrospective cohort of adults infected with CRE or CRPA who received oral switch or intravenous antibiotics at hospital discharge from January 1, 2017, to April 30, 2024. Patients were included if they were eligible for oral switch and infected with an isolate susceptible to one or more oral antibiotics; non-bacteremic urinary tract infections were excluded. The primary outcome was 30-day clinical success at end of therapy, defined as lack of infection-related hospitalization, infection-related recurrence, or change/escalation of therapy. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS) and 30-day all-cause mortality from end of therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-five patients were included; 51% received oral switch antibiotics and 49% received intravenous antibiotics. Thirty-three percent of patients had CRE, 67% had CRPA, and 38% of cultures were polymicrobial. The most common infection types were pneumonia (33%), intra-abdominal (26%), and bone/joint (22%). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) duration of outpatient therapy was 12 (6-25) days versus 20 (4-34) days for the oral switch and intravenous antibiotic groups, respectively (p = 0.341). 30-day clinical success was 61% in the oral switch and 48% in the intravenous antibiotic groups (p = 0.349); the median (IQR) hospital LOS for the oral switch and intravenous antibiotic groups was 14 (9-25) days and 16 (9-49) days, respectively (p = 0.165); 30-day mortality was 4% in the oral switch group and 15% in the intravenous antibiotic group (p = 0.193).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A limited sample of patients who received oral switch antibiotics had similar outcomes to intravenous outpatient treatment of carbapenem-resistant organisms, with a shorter hospital LOS.</p>","PeriodicalId":20013,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"244-250"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.70012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare outcomes of oral switch versus intravenous antibiotics for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) infections at hospital discharge.

Methods: Institutional review board approved, retrospective cohort of adults infected with CRE or CRPA who received oral switch or intravenous antibiotics at hospital discharge from January 1, 2017, to April 30, 2024. Patients were included if they were eligible for oral switch and infected with an isolate susceptible to one or more oral antibiotics; non-bacteremic urinary tract infections were excluded. The primary outcome was 30-day clinical success at end of therapy, defined as lack of infection-related hospitalization, infection-related recurrence, or change/escalation of therapy. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS) and 30-day all-cause mortality from end of therapy.

Results: Fifty-five patients were included; 51% received oral switch antibiotics and 49% received intravenous antibiotics. Thirty-three percent of patients had CRE, 67% had CRPA, and 38% of cultures were polymicrobial. The most common infection types were pneumonia (33%), intra-abdominal (26%), and bone/joint (22%). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) duration of outpatient therapy was 12 (6-25) days versus 20 (4-34) days for the oral switch and intravenous antibiotic groups, respectively (p = 0.341). 30-day clinical success was 61% in the oral switch and 48% in the intravenous antibiotic groups (p = 0.349); the median (IQR) hospital LOS for the oral switch and intravenous antibiotic groups was 14 (9-25) days and 16 (9-49) days, respectively (p = 0.165); 30-day mortality was 4% in the oral switch group and 15% in the intravenous antibiotic group (p = 0.193).

Conclusion: A limited sample of patients who received oral switch antibiotics had similar outcomes to intravenous outpatient treatment of carbapenem-resistant organisms, with a shorter hospital LOS.

对出院时耐碳青霉烯肠杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌感染口服与静脉注射抗生素的回顾性队列研究。
目的:比较口服切换抗生素与静脉注射抗生素治疗出院时耐碳青霉烯肠杆菌(CRE)和铜绿假单胞菌(CRPA)感染的结果。方法:2017年1月1日至2024年4月30日,机构审查委员会批准的CRE或CRPA感染成人在出院时接受口服或静脉注射抗生素的回顾性队列。如果患者符合口服转换条件,并且感染了对一种或多种口服抗生素敏感的分离株,则纳入患者;排除非菌血症性尿路感染。主要终点是治疗结束后30天的临床成功,定义为没有感染相关住院、感染相关复发或治疗的改变/升级。次要结局包括住院时间(LOS)和治疗结束后30天的全因死亡率。结果:纳入55例患者;51%接受口服切换抗生素治疗,49%接受静脉注射抗生素治疗。33%的患者有CRE, 67%的患者有CRPA, 38%的患者有多微生物培养。最常见的感染类型是肺炎(33%)、腹腔内(26%)和骨/关节(22%)。门诊治疗的中位数(四分位间距[IQR])持续时间为12(6-25)天,而口服切换组和静脉注射抗生素组分别为20(4-34)天(p = 0.341)。口服抗生素组30天临床成功率为61%,静脉注射抗生素组为48% (p = 0.349);口服切换抗生素组和静脉注射抗生素组的中位住院时间(IQR)分别为14(9-25)天和16(9-49)天(p = 0.165);口服转换组30天死亡率为4%,静脉注射抗生素组为15% (p = 0.193)。结论:一小部分接受口服转换抗生素的患者与静脉门诊治疗碳青霉烯耐药菌的结果相似,且医院LOS较短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmacotherapy
Pharmacotherapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.40%
发文量
93
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmacotherapy is devoted to publication of original research articles on all aspects of human pharmacology and review articles on drugs and drug therapy. The Editors and Editorial Board invite original research reports on pharmacokinetic, bioavailability, and drug interaction studies, clinical trials, investigations of specific pharmacological properties of drugs, and related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信