Are acute asthma presentations to the emergency department an opportunity for optimising long-term management? A qualitative study on beliefs and behaviours of healthcare professionals.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Imogen Skene, Chris Griffiths, Katherine Pike, Benjamin Michael Bloom, Paul Pfeffer, Liz Steed
{"title":"Are acute asthma presentations to the emergency department an opportunity for optimising long-term management? A qualitative study on beliefs and behaviours of healthcare professionals.","authors":"Imogen Skene, Chris Griffiths, Katherine Pike, Benjamin Michael Bloom, Paul Pfeffer, Liz Steed","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Guidelines recommend Emergency Department (ED) healthcare professionals (HCPs) ensure patients have a supply of inhaled corticosteroid on discharge after an acute asthma presentation. By optimising medication, acute asthma presentations to EDs are a potentially reachable moment to improve long-term asthma management as well as treating the acute exacerbation. Optimising medication for long-term asthma management requires behavioural changes from HCPs, which may be considered unacceptable or unfeasible. Understanding health beliefs and attitudes of HCPs who provide asthma treatment in emergency care is a critical step in determining whether interventions could be developed to address this.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To explore the health beliefs, attitudes and behaviours of HCPs involved in the care of adult patients presenting to the ED with asthma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>UK HCPs, purposively sampled for profession, experience and work setting, were invited to participate in a semi-structured face-to-face or online interview. These were conducted between November 2021 and June 2022. Eligible participants had experience of caring for patients with asthma in either the ED or primary care setting. Interviews were analysed with reflective thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>19 HCPs were interviewed. Four themes were identified, constructed around the beliefs and behaviours of HCPs: (1) Compassionate understanding, that is, recognising the accessibility of ED, patients' self-management and the emotional aspects of exacerbations, (2) Doing what is right for the patient, that is, maximising a reachable moment, (3) Tensions of capacity in the system, that is, acknowledging workload within ED and (4) ED as providers of preventative care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found HCPs recognise both the accessibility of the ED as a place for patients to seek help and that there are potential opportunities to optimise asthma control, but there are barriers to overcome. ED professionals may be willing to make changes in the best interests of the patients if they can follow guidelines and receive training.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-214407","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Guidelines recommend Emergency Department (ED) healthcare professionals (HCPs) ensure patients have a supply of inhaled corticosteroid on discharge after an acute asthma presentation. By optimising medication, acute asthma presentations to EDs are a potentially reachable moment to improve long-term asthma management as well as treating the acute exacerbation. Optimising medication for long-term asthma management requires behavioural changes from HCPs, which may be considered unacceptable or unfeasible. Understanding health beliefs and attitudes of HCPs who provide asthma treatment in emergency care is a critical step in determining whether interventions could be developed to address this.

Aims: To explore the health beliefs, attitudes and behaviours of HCPs involved in the care of adult patients presenting to the ED with asthma.

Methods: UK HCPs, purposively sampled for profession, experience and work setting, were invited to participate in a semi-structured face-to-face or online interview. These were conducted between November 2021 and June 2022. Eligible participants had experience of caring for patients with asthma in either the ED or primary care setting. Interviews were analysed with reflective thematic analysis.

Results: 19 HCPs were interviewed. Four themes were identified, constructed around the beliefs and behaviours of HCPs: (1) Compassionate understanding, that is, recognising the accessibility of ED, patients' self-management and the emotional aspects of exacerbations, (2) Doing what is right for the patient, that is, maximising a reachable moment, (3) Tensions of capacity in the system, that is, acknowledging workload within ED and (4) ED as providers of preventative care.

Conclusion: This study found HCPs recognise both the accessibility of the ED as a place for patients to seek help and that there are potential opportunities to optimise asthma control, but there are barriers to overcome. ED professionals may be willing to make changes in the best interests of the patients if they can follow guidelines and receive training.

急性哮喘到急诊科就诊是优化长期治疗的机会吗?医疗保健专业人员的信念和行为的定性研究。
背景:指南建议急诊科(ED)医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)确保急性哮喘患者出院时吸入皮质类固醇供应。通过优化药物,急性哮喘对急诊科的表现是一个潜在的可达时刻,以改善长期哮喘管理以及治疗急性加重。优化长期哮喘治疗的药物需要医护人员改变行为,这可能被认为是不可接受或不可行的。了解在紧急护理中提供哮喘治疗的医护人员的健康信念和态度是确定是否可以制定干预措施以解决这一问题的关键一步。目的:探讨急诊成人哮喘患者医护人员的健康信念、态度和行为。方法:对英国的医护人员进行专业、经验和工作环境的抽样调查,邀请他们参加半结构化的面对面或在线访谈。这些研究在2021年11月至2022年6月期间进行。符合条件的参与者有在急诊科或初级保健机构照顾哮喘患者的经验。访谈采用反思性专题分析进行分析。结果:共访谈19名HCPs。围绕hcp的信念和行为,确定了四个主题:(1)富有同情心的理解,即认识到急诊科的可及性,患者的自我管理和病情恶化的情绪方面;(2)为患者做正确的事情,即最大化可达的时刻;(3)系统中的能力紧张,即承认急诊科的工作量;(4)急诊科作为预防性护理的提供者。结论:本研究发现,医护人员认识到急诊科是患者寻求帮助的地方,也认识到优化哮喘控制的潜在机会,但仍有一些障碍需要克服。如果ED专业人员能够遵循指导方针并接受培训,他们可能愿意为患者的最大利益做出改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Journal
Emergency Medicine Journal 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
262
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Emergency Medicine Journal is a leading international journal reporting developments and advances in emergency medicine and acute care. It has relevance to all specialties involved in the management of emergencies in the hospital and prehospital environment. Each issue contains editorials, reviews, original research, evidence based reviews, letters and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信