The Inflation Reduction Act and Drug Development: Potential Early Signals of Impact on Post-Approval Clinical Trials.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Hanke Zheng, Julie A Patterson, Jonathan D Campbell
{"title":"The Inflation Reduction Act and Drug Development: Potential Early Signals of Impact on Post-Approval Clinical Trials.","authors":"Hanke Zheng, Julie A Patterson, Jonathan D Campbell","doi":"10.1007/s43441-025-00774-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Inflation Reduction Act's (IRA) Drug Price Negotiation Program (DPNP) may reduce incentives for industry investments in post-approval clinical development. We aimed to explore the IRA's impact on the initiation of industry-sponsored, post-approval clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Citeline's Trialtrove database (7/2014-8/2024), we conducted an interrupted time series analysis (ITSA) to estimate the IRA's impact on the initiation of industry-sponsored Phase I-III trials in previously approved drugs, excluding all vaccines and COVID-19 treatments. We conducted an additional ITSA to examine post-IRA changes in government-funded trials, hypothesized to be unaffected by the IRA, and sensitivity analyses to explore potential exogenous confounding factors. Finally, we explored differences in the IRA's impact on post-approval industry-sponsored clinical trial initiation in small versus large molecule drugs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following the IRA's passage, the average monthly number of industry-sponsored trials on post-approval drugs decreased by 38.4%. The ITSA indicated that the IRA's passage was associated with an immediate drop of 11.1 industry-sponsored trials (p-value < 0.05) and an additional decrease by 0.9 trials per month (p-value < 0.01). The IRA's passage was not statistically associated with changes in government-funded trial initiation. Sensitivity analyses supported ITSA findings. Initiation of post-approval industry-sponsored trials decreased by 47.3% and 32.9% for small and large molecule drugs, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The IRA's passage was associated with reductions in industry-sponsored, but not government-funded, post-approval trials, with larger reductions for small molecule drugs. These findings provide early evidence supporting concerns around IRA-related reductions in incentives for post-approval clinical development.</p>","PeriodicalId":23084,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","volume":" ","pages":"781-789"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12181196/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-025-00774-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Inflation Reduction Act's (IRA) Drug Price Negotiation Program (DPNP) may reduce incentives for industry investments in post-approval clinical development. We aimed to explore the IRA's impact on the initiation of industry-sponsored, post-approval clinical trials.

Methods: Using Citeline's Trialtrove database (7/2014-8/2024), we conducted an interrupted time series analysis (ITSA) to estimate the IRA's impact on the initiation of industry-sponsored Phase I-III trials in previously approved drugs, excluding all vaccines and COVID-19 treatments. We conducted an additional ITSA to examine post-IRA changes in government-funded trials, hypothesized to be unaffected by the IRA, and sensitivity analyses to explore potential exogenous confounding factors. Finally, we explored differences in the IRA's impact on post-approval industry-sponsored clinical trial initiation in small versus large molecule drugs.

Results: Following the IRA's passage, the average monthly number of industry-sponsored trials on post-approval drugs decreased by 38.4%. The ITSA indicated that the IRA's passage was associated with an immediate drop of 11.1 industry-sponsored trials (p-value < 0.05) and an additional decrease by 0.9 trials per month (p-value < 0.01). The IRA's passage was not statistically associated with changes in government-funded trial initiation. Sensitivity analyses supported ITSA findings. Initiation of post-approval industry-sponsored trials decreased by 47.3% and 32.9% for small and large molecule drugs, respectively.

Conclusions: The IRA's passage was associated with reductions in industry-sponsored, but not government-funded, post-approval trials, with larger reductions for small molecule drugs. These findings provide early evidence supporting concerns around IRA-related reductions in incentives for post-approval clinical development.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

通货膨胀减少法案和药物开发:对批准后临床试验影响的潜在早期信号。
背景:通货膨胀减少法案(IRA)的药品价格谈判计划(DPNP)可能会减少对批准后临床开发的行业投资的激励。我们的目的是探讨IRA对行业赞助的、批准后的临床试验启动的影响。方法:使用Citeline的Trialtrove数据库(2014年7月- 2024年8月),我们进行了中断时间序列分析(ITSA),以估计IRA对先前批准的药物启动行业赞助的I-III期试验的影响,不包括所有疫苗和COVID-19治疗。我们进行了额外的ITSA来检查政府资助的试验中IRA后的变化,假设不受IRA影响,并进行敏感性分析以探索潜在的外源性混杂因素。最后,我们探讨了IRA对小分子和大分子药物批准后行业资助的临床试验启动的影响差异。结果:随着IRA的通过,行业资助的批准后药物试验的平均每月数量减少了38.4%。ITSA指出,IRA的通过与11.1个行业资助试验的立即下降有关(p值结论:IRA的通过与行业资助的减少有关,而不是政府资助的,批准后试验的减少,小分子药物的减少更大。这些发现提供了早期证据,支持了人们对审批后临床开发奖励减少的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science MEDICAL INFORMATICS-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science (TIRS) is the official scientific journal of DIA that strives to advance medical product discovery, development, regulation, and use through the publication of peer-reviewed original and review articles, commentaries, and letters to the editor across the spectrum of converting biomedical science into practical solutions to advance human health. The focus areas of the journal are as follows: Biostatistics Clinical Trials Product Development and Innovation Global Perspectives Policy Regulatory Science Product Safety Special Populations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信