Salbutamol for analgesia in renal colic: a prospective, randomised, placebo-controlled phase II trial.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Graham D Johnson, Andrew Tabner, Apostolos Fakis, Rachelle Sherman, Victoria Chester, Andrew Skeggs, Fran Game, Richard Jackson, Suzanne M Mason
{"title":"Salbutamol for analgesia in renal colic: a prospective, randomised, placebo-controlled phase II trial.","authors":"Graham D Johnson, Andrew Tabner, Apostolos Fakis, Rachelle Sherman, Victoria Chester, Andrew Skeggs, Fran Game, Richard Jackson, Suzanne M Mason","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The pain of renal colic, mediated in part by ureteral spasm and inflammation, is often severe and difficult to control. Salbutamol has been shown to cause ureteral relaxation, but its effects on the pain of renal colic have never been studied. The objective of this trial was to investigate whether the use of intravenous salbutamol in addition to standard analgesia was associated with greater pain reduction compared with standard analgesia alone in patients presenting to emergency departments (EDs) with renal colic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-centre, double-blind, phase II, randomised, placebo-controlled trial recruited adult (≥18 years) ED patients with clinically suspected renal colic. Participants were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 250 µg of intravenous salbutamol or a placebo (0.9% sodium chloride). The primary outcome was the difference in the change in pain scores (measured on a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale) from baseline to 30 min following trial treatment administration in participants with subsequently confirmed renal colic. A modified intention-to-treat analysis was undertaken for the primary population of participants with confirmed renal colic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consent was obtained from 151 patients; 108 participants with confirmed renal colic were included in the primary outcome analysis. There was no statistical difference between groups in median change in pain score at 30 min (salbutamol group -18 mm (IQR -25 to -3), placebo group -13 mm (IQR -33 to -1), difference 5 mm (95% CI -16 to 6, p=0.575)). No significant differences were found in the secondary outcomes related to pain, patient satisfaction or opiate requirement.More adverse events (AEs) were observed in the salbutamol group (65) compared with placebo (42, p=0.02); no unexpected AEs were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This trial has not identified a clinically or statistically significant benefit from the addition of intravenous salbutamol to standard care for patients presenting to an ED with pain caused by renal colic.</p><p><strong>Trial registration numbers: </strong>The trial was registered with the European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT), reference 2018-004305-11. It was also registered with the ISRCTN Registry, reference 14552440.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"378-386"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12171521/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-214326","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The pain of renal colic, mediated in part by ureteral spasm and inflammation, is often severe and difficult to control. Salbutamol has been shown to cause ureteral relaxation, but its effects on the pain of renal colic have never been studied. The objective of this trial was to investigate whether the use of intravenous salbutamol in addition to standard analgesia was associated with greater pain reduction compared with standard analgesia alone in patients presenting to emergency departments (EDs) with renal colic.

Methods: This single-centre, double-blind, phase II, randomised, placebo-controlled trial recruited adult (≥18 years) ED patients with clinically suspected renal colic. Participants were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 250 µg of intravenous salbutamol or a placebo (0.9% sodium chloride). The primary outcome was the difference in the change in pain scores (measured on a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale) from baseline to 30 min following trial treatment administration in participants with subsequently confirmed renal colic. A modified intention-to-treat analysis was undertaken for the primary population of participants with confirmed renal colic.

Results: Consent was obtained from 151 patients; 108 participants with confirmed renal colic were included in the primary outcome analysis. There was no statistical difference between groups in median change in pain score at 30 min (salbutamol group -18 mm (IQR -25 to -3), placebo group -13 mm (IQR -33 to -1), difference 5 mm (95% CI -16 to 6, p=0.575)). No significant differences were found in the secondary outcomes related to pain, patient satisfaction or opiate requirement.More adverse events (AEs) were observed in the salbutamol group (65) compared with placebo (42, p=0.02); no unexpected AEs were identified.

Conclusions: This trial has not identified a clinically or statistically significant benefit from the addition of intravenous salbutamol to standard care for patients presenting to an ED with pain caused by renal colic.

Trial registration numbers: The trial was registered with the European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT), reference 2018-004305-11. It was also registered with the ISRCTN Registry, reference 14552440.

沙丁胺醇用于肾绞痛的镇痛:一项前瞻性、随机、安慰剂对照的II期试验。
背景:肾绞痛的疼痛,部分由输尿管痉挛和炎症介导,往往是严重的,难以控制。沙丁胺醇已被证明可引起输尿管松弛,但其对肾绞痛疼痛的影响从未被研究过。本试验的目的是调查在急诊科(ed)肾绞痛患者中,与单独使用标准镇痛相比,静脉注射沙丁胺醇加标准镇痛是否能更大程度地减轻疼痛。方法:这项单中心、双盲、II期、随机、安慰剂对照试验招募了临床疑似肾绞痛的成年ED患者(≥18岁)。参与者按1:1的比例随机分配,接受250µg静脉沙丁胺醇或安慰剂(0.9%氯化钠)。主要结局是疼痛评分(以100毫米视觉模拟量表测量)在试验治疗后从基线到30分钟的变化差异,这些参与者随后证实有肾绞痛。对确认肾绞痛的主要人群进行了改良的意向治疗分析。结果:151例患者获得同意;108名确诊为肾绞痛的参与者被纳入主要结局分析。30 min疼痛评分中位变化组间差异无统计学意义(沙丁胺醇组-18 mm (IQR -25 ~ -3),安慰剂组-13 mm (IQR -33 ~ -1),差异5 mm (95% CI -16 ~ 6, p=0.575)。与疼痛、患者满意度或阿片类药物需求相关的次要结局没有发现显著差异。沙丁胺醇组(65例)的不良事件发生率高于安慰剂组(42例,p=0.02);未发现意外ae。结论:本试验未发现在标准治疗中加入静脉注射沙丁胺醇对肾绞痛引起的ED患者有临床或统计学上显著的益处。试验注册号:该试验已在欧盟药品监管局临床试验数据库(EudraCT)注册,参考文献2018-004305-11。它也在ISRCTN注册中心注册,参考14552440。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Journal
Emergency Medicine Journal 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
262
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Emergency Medicine Journal is a leading international journal reporting developments and advances in emergency medicine and acute care. It has relevance to all specialties involved in the management of emergencies in the hospital and prehospital environment. Each issue contains editorials, reviews, original research, evidence based reviews, letters and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信