Cellularity of organs in mature rams of different breeds.

W F Colebrook, J L Black, G H Brown, J B Donnelly
{"title":"Cellularity of organs in mature rams of different breeds.","authors":"W F Colebrook,&nbsp;J L Black,&nbsp;G H Brown,&nbsp;J B Donnelly","doi":"10.1071/bi9880201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The relative importance of cell number and cell size in determining the mass of 16 organs and tissues in mature rams of six different breeds was studied through estimation of organ deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) content. The mean fleece-free empty body weight (FFEBW) ranged from 54.6 +/- 0.3 kg for Camden Park Merinos to 76.7 +/- 1.6 kg for Strong Wool Merinos. For all organs, mass increased with FFEBW, but the relationship was significant across all sheep for only eight organs (blood, kidney, liver, abomasum, vastus lateralis muscle, skin, perirenal fat and triceps muscle). There were significant differences between breeds in the mass of 11 organs. With four (heart, rumen reticulum, small intestine and testicular fat) this difference was independent of breed differences in FFEBW, whereas with another four (kidney, abomasum, vastus lateralis muscle and skin), it was closely related to FFEBW. Breed differences in the mass of the remaining three organs (blood, liver and perirenal fat) were partly related to FFEBW and partly breed specific. Blood mass increased with FFEBW across all animals, but, within a breed, it declined as FFEBW increased. The increase in the mass of perirenal fat with FFEBW was significantly greater within a breed than between breeds. Cell number increased significantly with the mass of all organs except blood and brain. There were between-breed differences in the number of cells in seven organs (liver, heart, rumen reticulum, abomasum, small intestine, vastus lateralis muscle and skin), which, except for heart, were attributable to between-breed differences in organ mass. With heart, the increase in cell number with organ mass within a breed was greater than across all breeds. Cell size was significantly related to organ mass only with vastus lateralis muscle, spleen, perirenal fat and liver. The relationship for vastus lateralis muscle and spleen was negative, indicating that cells were smaller in larger organs. There were differences between breeds in cell size for heart, vastus lateralis and triceps muscles. These differences for heart and triceps muscle were breed specific, whereas for vastus lateralis muscle it was attributed to breed differences in organ weight. There was a 30-fold range in mean cell size across organs, with adipose tissue having the largest cells, muscle tissue intermediate and visceral tissues the smallest. In general, organ mass is positively related to FFEBW. Cell number, not cell size, is largely responsible for differences in organ mass between mature sheep of different breeds.</p>","PeriodicalId":8573,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of biological sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of biological sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/bi9880201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The relative importance of cell number and cell size in determining the mass of 16 organs and tissues in mature rams of six different breeds was studied through estimation of organ deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) content. The mean fleece-free empty body weight (FFEBW) ranged from 54.6 +/- 0.3 kg for Camden Park Merinos to 76.7 +/- 1.6 kg for Strong Wool Merinos. For all organs, mass increased with FFEBW, but the relationship was significant across all sheep for only eight organs (blood, kidney, liver, abomasum, vastus lateralis muscle, skin, perirenal fat and triceps muscle). There were significant differences between breeds in the mass of 11 organs. With four (heart, rumen reticulum, small intestine and testicular fat) this difference was independent of breed differences in FFEBW, whereas with another four (kidney, abomasum, vastus lateralis muscle and skin), it was closely related to FFEBW. Breed differences in the mass of the remaining three organs (blood, liver and perirenal fat) were partly related to FFEBW and partly breed specific. Blood mass increased with FFEBW across all animals, but, within a breed, it declined as FFEBW increased. The increase in the mass of perirenal fat with FFEBW was significantly greater within a breed than between breeds. Cell number increased significantly with the mass of all organs except blood and brain. There were between-breed differences in the number of cells in seven organs (liver, heart, rumen reticulum, abomasum, small intestine, vastus lateralis muscle and skin), which, except for heart, were attributable to between-breed differences in organ mass. With heart, the increase in cell number with organ mass within a breed was greater than across all breeds. Cell size was significantly related to organ mass only with vastus lateralis muscle, spleen, perirenal fat and liver. The relationship for vastus lateralis muscle and spleen was negative, indicating that cells were smaller in larger organs. There were differences between breeds in cell size for heart, vastus lateralis and triceps muscles. These differences for heart and triceps muscle were breed specific, whereas for vastus lateralis muscle it was attributed to breed differences in organ weight. There was a 30-fold range in mean cell size across organs, with adipose tissue having the largest cells, muscle tissue intermediate and visceral tissues the smallest. In general, organ mass is positively related to FFEBW. Cell number, not cell size, is largely responsible for differences in organ mass between mature sheep of different breeds.

不同品种成熟公羊器官的细胞结构。
通过对6个不同品种成熟公羊器官脱氧核糖核酸(DNA)含量的测定,研究了细胞数量和细胞大小在确定其16个器官和组织质量中的相对重要性。平均无绒空体重(FFEBW)从卡姆登公园美利奴的54.6 +/- 0.3 kg到强壮羊毛美利奴的76.7 +/- 1.6 kg不等。所有器官的质量均随肥厚增加而增加,但只有8个器官(血液、肾脏、肝脏、皱胃、股外侧肌、皮肤、肾周脂肪和肱三头肌)的质量与肥厚之间的关系显著。11个器官的质量在品种间有显著差异。其中4种(心脏、瘤胃网、小肠和睾丸脂肪)的差异与FFEBW的品种差异无关,而另外4种(肾脏、皱胃、股外侧肌和皮肤)的差异与FFEBW密切相关。其余三个器官(血液、肝脏和肾周脂肪)质量的品种差异部分与FFEBW有关,部分与品种特异性有关。所有动物的血质量都随着血重的增加而增加,但在同一品种内,血质量随着血重的增加而下降。添加FFEBW后,同一品种间肾周脂肪质量的增加显著大于品种间。除血、脑外,各脏器细胞数量均随体积增大而显著增加。肝脏、心脏、瘤胃网、皱胃、小肠、股外侧肌和皮肤等7个脏器的细胞数存在种间差异,除心脏外,其他7个脏器的细胞数均存在种间差异。就心脏而言,一个品种内细胞数量随器官质量的增加大于所有品种。细胞大小仅与股外侧肌、脾脏、肾周脂肪和肝脏的脏器质量显著相关。股外侧肌与脾脏呈负相关,说明脏器越大,细胞越小。不同品种之间心脏、股外侧肌和肱三头肌的细胞大小存在差异。心脏和肱三头肌的差异是品种特有的,而股外侧肌的差异则归因于器官重量的品种差异。各器官的平均细胞大小相差30倍,脂肪组织的细胞最大,肌肉组织居中,内脏组织最小。一般情况下,器官质量与FFEBW呈正相关。不同品种的成熟羊在器官质量上的差异主要是由细胞数量而不是细胞大小决定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信