Ischemic outcomes after left atrial appendage closure following intracerebral hemorrhage: a retrospective inverse probability weighting analysis from the HANSE-LAAC registry.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Dominik Jurczyk, Matthias Mezger, Felicitas Lemmer, Caroline Fatum, Ramon Gradaus, Nele-Kristin Drochner-Brocks, Roza Saraei, Christian Frerker, Thomas Stiermaier, Christina Paitazoglou, Ingo Eitel
{"title":"Ischemic outcomes after left atrial appendage closure following intracerebral hemorrhage: a retrospective inverse probability weighting analysis from the HANSE-LAAC registry.","authors":"Dominik Jurczyk, Matthias Mezger, Felicitas Lemmer, Caroline Fatum, Ramon Gradaus, Nele-Kristin Drochner-Brocks, Roza Saraei, Christian Frerker, Thomas Stiermaier, Christina Paitazoglou, Ingo Eitel","doi":"10.1007/s00392-025-02668-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is associated with worse outcomes and subsequent high risk for acute arterial ischemic events. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an established procedure in case of atrial fibrillation and adverse events, such as severe bleeding. Clinical benefits of LAAC in patients with ICH are currently unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The single-center registry HANSE-LAAC included consecutively treated patients from 2014 to 2022. Index-procedure and standardized follow-ups at 3 and 12 months were analyzed regarding safety and efficacy retrospectively. Mortality, major adverse cardiovascular, and bleeding events were compared between patients with or without ICH. We used Cox proportional hazard models and inverse probability weights to adjust confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>401 patients received percutaneous LAAC (ICH 15.2%, n = 61 and non-ICH 84.8%, n = 340). The composite endpoint of death, MACE, and bleeding was significantly lower in the ICH group (HR 0.35, confidence interval [CI] 0.05-4.62, p = 0.0044). This clinical benefit was mainly driven by a significant reduction in bleeding events (HR 0.27; CI 0.06-1.15, p = 0.04). Re-hospitalization was significantly lower as well (HR 0.36; CI 0.20-0.64, p < 0.0001). Adjustment for confounders and inverse probability weighting for the probability of ICH showed no statistically significant difference in mortality (HR 0.53, CI 0.15-1.92, p = 0.33), stroke (HR 0.32 CI 0.03-3.13, p = 0.33), bleeding (HR 0.26; CI 0.05-1.29, p = 0.02), and MACE (HR 0.29; CI 0.04-2.36, p = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LAAC in ICH was safe and associated with less MACE, bleeding, and re-hospitalization. Randomized-controlled trials are needed to confirm these first positive signs.</p>","PeriodicalId":10474,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Research in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-025-02668-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is associated with worse outcomes and subsequent high risk for acute arterial ischemic events. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an established procedure in case of atrial fibrillation and adverse events, such as severe bleeding. Clinical benefits of LAAC in patients with ICH are currently unclear.

Methods: The single-center registry HANSE-LAAC included consecutively treated patients from 2014 to 2022. Index-procedure and standardized follow-ups at 3 and 12 months were analyzed regarding safety and efficacy retrospectively. Mortality, major adverse cardiovascular, and bleeding events were compared between patients with or without ICH. We used Cox proportional hazard models and inverse probability weights to adjust confounders.

Results: 401 patients received percutaneous LAAC (ICH 15.2%, n = 61 and non-ICH 84.8%, n = 340). The composite endpoint of death, MACE, and bleeding was significantly lower in the ICH group (HR 0.35, confidence interval [CI] 0.05-4.62, p = 0.0044). This clinical benefit was mainly driven by a significant reduction in bleeding events (HR 0.27; CI 0.06-1.15, p = 0.04). Re-hospitalization was significantly lower as well (HR 0.36; CI 0.20-0.64, p < 0.0001). Adjustment for confounders and inverse probability weighting for the probability of ICH showed no statistically significant difference in mortality (HR 0.53, CI 0.15-1.92, p = 0.33), stroke (HR 0.32 CI 0.03-3.13, p = 0.33), bleeding (HR 0.26; CI 0.05-1.29, p = 0.02), and MACE (HR 0.29; CI 0.04-2.36, p = 0.002).

Conclusion: LAAC in ICH was safe and associated with less MACE, bleeding, and re-hospitalization. Randomized-controlled trials are needed to confirm these first positive signs.

脑出血后左心耳关闭后的缺血性结果:来自HANSE-LAAC登记的回顾性逆概率加权分析。
背景:脑出血(ICH)与较差的预后和随后的急性动脉缺血事件的高风险相关。经皮左心房附件闭合术(LAAC)是在房颤和不良事件,如严重出血的情况下建立的程序。LAAC对脑出血患者的临床益处目前尚不清楚。方法:单中心注册HANSE-LAAC纳入2014 - 2022年连续治疗的患者。回顾性分析3个月和12个月的指标程序和标准化随访的安全性和有效性。比较脑出血患者和非脑出血患者的死亡率、主要心血管不良事件和出血事件。我们使用Cox比例风险模型和逆概率权重来调整混杂因素。结果:401例患者接受经皮LAAC治疗,其中颅内出血15.2% (n = 61),非颅内出血84.8% (n = 340)。ICH组的死亡、MACE和出血的综合终点显著降低(HR 0.35,可信区间[CI] 0.05-4.62, p = 0.0044)。这一临床获益主要是由于出血事件的显著减少(HR 0.27;CI 0.06-1.15, p = 0.04)。再住院率也显著降低(HR 0.36;结论:颅内出血患者LAAC是安全的,与MACE、出血和再住院率的降低相关。需要随机对照试验来证实这些最初的积极迹象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Research in Cardiology
Clinical Research in Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Research in Cardiology is an international journal for clinical cardiovascular research. It provides a forum for original and review articles as well as critical perspective articles. Articles are only accepted if they meet stringent scientific standards and have undergone peer review. The journal regularly receives articles from the field of clinical cardiology, angiology, as well as heart and vascular surgery. As the official journal of the German Cardiac Society, it gives a current and competent survey on the diagnosis and therapy of heart and vascular diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信