Outcomes and Toxicity following 3 or More Definitive Courses of Thoracic Radiation Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Abigael Odwuor, Percy Lee, Joe Y Chang, Saumil Gandhi, Zhongxing Liao, Steven H Lin, Aileen Chen, Quynh-Nhu Nguyen, Michael S O'Reilly, Stephen G Chun, Julianna Bronk, David Qian, Matthew S Ning
{"title":"Outcomes and Toxicity following 3 or More Definitive Courses of Thoracic Radiation Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.","authors":"Abigael Odwuor, Percy Lee, Joe Y Chang, Saumil Gandhi, Zhongxing Liao, Steven H Lin, Aileen Chen, Quynh-Nhu Nguyen, Michael S O'Reilly, Stephen G Chun, Julianna Bronk, David Qian, Matthew S Ning","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Salvage re-irradiation is increasingly utilized to manage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) locoregional recurrence or new lung primaries in previously treated areas. There is sparse information on efficacy and toxicity profile. We report a large experience of patients treated with multiple courses of definitive radiation for new and recurrent NSCLC.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>Medical records of patients who underwent ≥ 3 definitive thoracic radiation therapy (RT) courses for new or recurrent NSCLC at our cancer center from 2012 through 2021 were retrospectively reviewed following institutional review board approval. Toxicity was graded per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 and outcomes were estimated using Kaplan-Meier.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 51 patients meeting inclusion criteria, there were 161 definitive thoracic RT courses (8 received 4 courses). Of these courses, 119 (74%) entailed SBRT for localized lesions; the remaining were conventional fractionation (half included concurrent chemotherapy). Seventeen patients (33%) received SBRT for every thoracic treatment course. There was overlap of treatment fields between separate courses for 38 patients (75%). Following last thoracic RT, median overall survival (OS) was 2.9 years (range, 1.5-4.4) and progression-free survival (PFS) was 14-months (range, 8.5-19). Three-year estimated OS (±standard error) was 81% (± 10%) for patients who received SBRT for every course and 32% (± 9%) among those treated with mixed modality. Overall Grade 3 toxicity incidence was 6%, no Grade 4 or 5 events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Definitive thoracic radiation can be a safe and effective local control modality (despite multiple prior treatments) and should be considered when planning multidisciplinary salvage therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical lung cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2025.04.002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Salvage re-irradiation is increasingly utilized to manage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) locoregional recurrence or new lung primaries in previously treated areas. There is sparse information on efficacy and toxicity profile. We report a large experience of patients treated with multiple courses of definitive radiation for new and recurrent NSCLC.

Methods and materials: Medical records of patients who underwent ≥ 3 definitive thoracic radiation therapy (RT) courses for new or recurrent NSCLC at our cancer center from 2012 through 2021 were retrospectively reviewed following institutional review board approval. Toxicity was graded per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 and outcomes were estimated using Kaplan-Meier.

Results: Among 51 patients meeting inclusion criteria, there were 161 definitive thoracic RT courses (8 received 4 courses). Of these courses, 119 (74%) entailed SBRT for localized lesions; the remaining were conventional fractionation (half included concurrent chemotherapy). Seventeen patients (33%) received SBRT for every thoracic treatment course. There was overlap of treatment fields between separate courses for 38 patients (75%). Following last thoracic RT, median overall survival (OS) was 2.9 years (range, 1.5-4.4) and progression-free survival (PFS) was 14-months (range, 8.5-19). Three-year estimated OS (±standard error) was 81% (± 10%) for patients who received SBRT for every course and 32% (± 9%) among those treated with mixed modality. Overall Grade 3 toxicity incidence was 6%, no Grade 4 or 5 events.

Conclusion: Definitive thoracic radiation can be a safe and effective local control modality (despite multiple prior treatments) and should be considered when planning multidisciplinary salvage therapy.

非小细胞肺癌胸部放射治疗3个或3个以上明确疗程后的结果和毒性
目的:补救性再照射越来越多地用于治疗非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)局部复发或先前治疗区域的新发肺原发。关于其疗效和毒性的资料很少。我们报告了对新发和复发的非小细胞肺癌患者进行多疗程放射治疗的大量经验。方法和材料:经机构审查委员会批准,回顾性审查2012年至2021年在我们癌症中心接受≥3个确诊胸部放射治疗(RT)疗程的新发或复发NSCLC患者的医疗记录。根据不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE) 5.0版对毒性进行分级,并使用Kaplan-Meier法估计结果。结果:51例符合纳入标准的患者中,有161个确定的胸部RT疗程(8个4疗程)。在这些疗程中,119例(74%)需要SBRT治疗局部病变;其余为常规分馏(一半包括同期化疗)。17例患者(33%)在每个胸部疗程中接受SBRT治疗。38例(75%)患者在不同疗程之间有治疗领域重叠。在最后一次胸部放疗后,中位总生存期(OS)为2.9年(范围1.5-4.4),无进展生存期(PFS)为14个月(范围8.5-19)。每个疗程接受SBRT的患者的三年估计OS(±标准误差)为81%(±10%),混合模式治疗的患者的三年估计OS(±标准误差)为32%(±9%)。总体3级毒性发生率为6%,无4级或5级毒性事件。结论:明确的胸部放射治疗是一种安全有效的局部控制方式(尽管有多次治疗),在规划多学科抢救治疗时应予以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical lung cancer
Clinical lung cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.80%
发文量
159
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Lung Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of lung cancer. Clinical Lung Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lung cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to lung cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信