Entrectinib-Induced Brugada Syndrome Leading to Ventricular Tachycardia in A Patient with ROS1 Fusion-Positive Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Q3 Medicine
European journal of case reports in internal medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.12890/2025_005232
Nobuo Ishiguro, Takeshi Mori, Makito Kaneshiro, Shin Hasegawa, Akimitsu Tanaka, Miyuki Ando, Kazuo Kato
{"title":"Entrectinib-Induced Brugada Syndrome Leading to Ventricular Tachycardia in A Patient with ROS1 Fusion-Positive Lung Adenocarcinoma.","authors":"Nobuo Ishiguro, Takeshi Mori, Makito Kaneshiro, Shin Hasegawa, Akimitsu Tanaka, Miyuki Ando, Kazuo Kato","doi":"10.12890/2025_005232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A 65-year-old male presented to the emergency room after experiencing syncope while driving, causing a self-inflicted accident. He had previously been diagnosed with stage IV A (cTXN2M1a) lung adenocarcinoma with C-ROS oncogene 1 (ROS1) fusion gene, wherein entrectinib (a multikinase inhibitor of ROS1, 600 mg orally once daily) was initiated as the first-line chemotherapy 12 days prior. He presented with haemodynamically unstable conditions without fever (blood pressure 89/42 mmHg; heart rate, 180/min). The 12-lead electrocardiogram revealed ventricular tachycardia (VT) with a left bundle branch block and right axis deviation. Synchronised electrical cardioversion terminated the sustained VT, and the post-electrocardiogram exhibited coved-type ST-segment elevation in V1 to V3. An emergency coronary angiography showed no abnormal findings. Coved-type ST-segment elevation in V1 to V3 persisted for two days following cessation of entrectinib; however, electrocardiogram findings gradually normalised, with no recurrence of clinical VT. Catheter ablation for VT was initially planned; however, the consultant pulmonologist considered that entrectinib could induce Brugada syndrome (BrS), resulting in sustained VT. Therefore, the plan was suspended and entrectinib was discontinued. Electrophysiological examination with programmed electrical and pilsicainide infusion for risk stratification failed to induce clinical VT, and the patient was considered at low risk for VT recurrence following entrectinib discontinuation. Accordingly, we opted for close observation. At the one-year follow-up, no ventricular arrhythmias were noted. The relationship between entrectinib and drug-induced BrS remains unclear, with few reported cases. Continuous or frequent electrocardiogram monitoring during hospitalisation post entrectinib initiation may help detect entrectinib-induced BrS.</p><p><strong>Learning points: </strong>The relationship between entrectinib and drug-induced Brugada syndrome remains unclear, and reports of entrectinib-induced Brugada syndrome are rare.We performed risk stratification using electrophysiological examinations in a case of entrectinib-induced Brugada syndrome in a patient with ROS1 fusion-positive lung adenocarcinoma.Our results suggest that continuous electrocardiogram monitoring or frequent electrocardiogram recording at least once a day several days following entrectinib initiation may help detect entrectinib-induced Brugada syndrome irrespective of being in or out of hospital.</p>","PeriodicalId":11908,"journal":{"name":"European journal of case reports in internal medicine","volume":"12 5","pages":"005232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12061223/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of case reports in internal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12890/2025_005232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A 65-year-old male presented to the emergency room after experiencing syncope while driving, causing a self-inflicted accident. He had previously been diagnosed with stage IV A (cTXN2M1a) lung adenocarcinoma with C-ROS oncogene 1 (ROS1) fusion gene, wherein entrectinib (a multikinase inhibitor of ROS1, 600 mg orally once daily) was initiated as the first-line chemotherapy 12 days prior. He presented with haemodynamically unstable conditions without fever (blood pressure 89/42 mmHg; heart rate, 180/min). The 12-lead electrocardiogram revealed ventricular tachycardia (VT) with a left bundle branch block and right axis deviation. Synchronised electrical cardioversion terminated the sustained VT, and the post-electrocardiogram exhibited coved-type ST-segment elevation in V1 to V3. An emergency coronary angiography showed no abnormal findings. Coved-type ST-segment elevation in V1 to V3 persisted for two days following cessation of entrectinib; however, electrocardiogram findings gradually normalised, with no recurrence of clinical VT. Catheter ablation for VT was initially planned; however, the consultant pulmonologist considered that entrectinib could induce Brugada syndrome (BrS), resulting in sustained VT. Therefore, the plan was suspended and entrectinib was discontinued. Electrophysiological examination with programmed electrical and pilsicainide infusion for risk stratification failed to induce clinical VT, and the patient was considered at low risk for VT recurrence following entrectinib discontinuation. Accordingly, we opted for close observation. At the one-year follow-up, no ventricular arrhythmias were noted. The relationship between entrectinib and drug-induced BrS remains unclear, with few reported cases. Continuous or frequent electrocardiogram monitoring during hospitalisation post entrectinib initiation may help detect entrectinib-induced BrS.

Learning points: The relationship between entrectinib and drug-induced Brugada syndrome remains unclear, and reports of entrectinib-induced Brugada syndrome are rare.We performed risk stratification using electrophysiological examinations in a case of entrectinib-induced Brugada syndrome in a patient with ROS1 fusion-positive lung adenocarcinoma.Our results suggest that continuous electrocardiogram monitoring or frequent electrocardiogram recording at least once a day several days following entrectinib initiation may help detect entrectinib-induced Brugada syndrome irrespective of being in or out of hospital.

enterrectinib诱导的Brugada综合征导致1例ROS1融合阳性肺腺癌患者室性心动过速。
一名65岁男性在开车时晕厥,造成自己造成的事故后被送往急诊室。他之前被诊断为IV期A (cTXN2M1a)肺腺癌,伴有C-ROS癌基因1 (ROS1)融合基因,12天前开始使用肠替尼(一种ROS1的多激酶抑制剂,1600 mg,每日一次口服)作为一线化疗。患者表现为血流动力学不稳定,无发热(血压89/42 mmHg;心率,180/分钟)。12导联心电图显示室性心动过速伴左束支阻滞和右轴偏曲。同步电复律终止了持续的室速,后心电图显示V1至V3的st段抬高。急诊冠状动脉造影未见异常。停替尼后,V1至V3的coded型st段升高持续2天;然而,心电图结果逐渐恢复正常,无临床室速复发。最初计划导管消融治疗室速;然而,顾问肺科医生认为enterrectinib可诱发Brugada综合征(BrS),导致持续性VT,因此暂停该计划并停用enterrectinib。程序性电生理检查和匹西替尼输注风险分层未能诱发临床室速,考虑患者停药后室速复发风险低。因此,我们选择了近距离观察。在一年的随访中,未发现室性心律失常。肠替尼与药物性BrS之间的关系尚不清楚,报道的病例很少。在开始使用恩替尼后住院期间持续或频繁的心电图监测可能有助于检测恩替尼诱发的BrS。学习要点:肠替尼与药物性Brugada综合征之间的关系尚不清楚,关于肠替尼诱导Brugada综合征的报道很少。我们使用电生理检查对一例肠替尼诱导的ROS1融合阳性肺腺癌患者的Brugada综合征进行了风险分层。我们的研究结果表明,连续的心电图监测或频繁的心电图记录,每天至少一次,在开始使用enterrectinib几天后,可能有助于发现entrectinib诱导的Brugada综合征,无论是否住院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
166
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Case Reports in Internal Medicine is an official journal of the European Federation of Internal Medicine (EFIM), representing 35 national societies from 33 European countries. The Journal''s mission is to promote the best medical practice and innovation in the field of acute and general medicine. It also provides a forum for internal medicine doctors where they can share new approaches with the aim of improving diagnostic and clinical skills in this field. EJCRIM welcomes high-quality case reports describing unusual or complex cases that an internist may encounter in everyday practice. The cases should either demonstrate the appropriateness of a diagnostic/therapeutic approach, describe a new procedure or maneuver, or show unusual manifestations of a disease or unexpected reactions. The Journal only accepts and publishes those case reports whose learning points provide new insight and/or contribute to advancing medical knowledge both in terms of diagnostics and therapeutic approaches. Case reports of medical errors, therefore, are also welcome as long as they provide innovative measures on how to prevent them in the current practice (Instructive Errors). The Journal may also consider brief and reasoned reports on issues relevant to the practice of Internal Medicine, as well as Abstracts submitted to the scientific meetings of acknowledged medical societies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信