Cost-Effectiveness of Ultrasound Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension in Belgium, France and The Netherlands.

IF 2 Q2 ECONOMICS
Rod S Taylor, Kaylie Metcalfe, Antoine Cremer, Sofie Brouwers, Joost Daemen, Sam Carter, Kieran Murphy, Marie-Claude Morice, Isabelle Durand-Zaleski, Linh Ngo, Michel Azizi, Ajay J Kirtane
{"title":"Cost-Effectiveness of Ultrasound Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension in Belgium, France and The Netherlands.","authors":"Rod S Taylor, Kaylie Metcalfe, Antoine Cremer, Sofie Brouwers, Joost Daemen, Sam Carter, Kieran Murphy, Marie-Claude Morice, Isabelle Durand-Zaleski, Linh Ngo, Michel Azizi, Ajay J Kirtane","doi":"10.1007/s41669-025-00574-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endovascular ultrasound renal denervation (uRDN) with the Paradise System has emerged as an adjunctive treatment option for the management of uncontrolled resistant hypertension (rHTN). This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of uRDN for rHTN across three European countries-Belgium, France and the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>On the basis of a previously developed state-transition Markov model, we projected costs, life years (LYs) and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) with the addition of uRDN to standard of care (SoC) compared with SoC alone over patient lifetime. Analyses were based on the RADIANCE-HTN TRIO trial, which demonstrated a mean reduction in office systolic blood pressure from a baseline of 8.5 mmHg at 2 months post-uRDN among patients with rHTN. Mortality and costs data were separately sourced and applied for each country independently. Country-specific discount rates were applied to both cost and outcomes. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the uncertainty surrounding the model inputs and sensitivity of the model results to changes in parameter inputs. Results were reported as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The base-case analyses of the models for all three countries show uRDN plus SoC results in improvement in both LYs and QALYs per patient and higher costs compared with SoC alone. The mean ICERs for each country model fall well below the respective country-specific willingness-to-pay thresholds (WTPs)-Belgium: WTP €40,000 and ICER €4426/QALY gained; France: WTP €50,000 and ICER €6261/QALY gained; and the Netherlands: WTP €20,000 and ICER €1654/QALY gained. Results were robust across scenarios and sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The addition of endovascular uRDN offers clinicians and payers a cost-effective adjunctive treatment approach alongside hypertensive medication for the management of rHTN in the healthcare systems of Belgium, France and the Netherlands.</p>","PeriodicalId":19770,"journal":{"name":"PharmacoEconomics Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PharmacoEconomics Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-025-00574-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endovascular ultrasound renal denervation (uRDN) with the Paradise System has emerged as an adjunctive treatment option for the management of uncontrolled resistant hypertension (rHTN). This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of uRDN for rHTN across three European countries-Belgium, France and the Netherlands.

Methods: On the basis of a previously developed state-transition Markov model, we projected costs, life years (LYs) and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) with the addition of uRDN to standard of care (SoC) compared with SoC alone over patient lifetime. Analyses were based on the RADIANCE-HTN TRIO trial, which demonstrated a mean reduction in office systolic blood pressure from a baseline of 8.5 mmHg at 2 months post-uRDN among patients with rHTN. Mortality and costs data were separately sourced and applied for each country independently. Country-specific discount rates were applied to both cost and outcomes. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the uncertainty surrounding the model inputs and sensitivity of the model results to changes in parameter inputs. Results were reported as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).

Results: The base-case analyses of the models for all three countries show uRDN plus SoC results in improvement in both LYs and QALYs per patient and higher costs compared with SoC alone. The mean ICERs for each country model fall well below the respective country-specific willingness-to-pay thresholds (WTPs)-Belgium: WTP €40,000 and ICER €4426/QALY gained; France: WTP €50,000 and ICER €6261/QALY gained; and the Netherlands: WTP €20,000 and ICER €1654/QALY gained. Results were robust across scenarios and sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions: The addition of endovascular uRDN offers clinicians and payers a cost-effective adjunctive treatment approach alongside hypertensive medication for the management of rHTN in the healthcare systems of Belgium, France and the Netherlands.

比利时、法国和荷兰超声肾去神经治疗顽固性高血压的成本-效果。
背景:血管内超声肾去神经支配(uRDN)与天堂系统已经成为一种辅助治疗选择,用于管理不受控制的顽固性高血压(rHTN)。本研究评估了三个欧洲国家(比利时、法国和荷兰)的rHTN uRDN的成本效益。方法:在先前开发的状态转移马尔可夫模型的基础上,我们预测了在标准护理(SoC)中添加uRDN的成本、生命年(LYs)和质量调整生命年(QALYs),并将其与单独的SoC进行比较。分析基于RADIANCE-HTN TRIO试验,该试验显示rHTN患者在urdn后2个月的办公室收缩压平均从基线8.5 mmHg降低。死亡率和成本数据分别来源,并独立应用于每个国家。具体国家的贴现率适用于成本和结果。进行了单向和概率敏感性分析,以评估模型输入的不确定性以及模型结果对参数输入变化的敏感性。结果以增量成本-效果比(ICERs)报告。结果:对所有三个国家的模型进行的基本案例分析表明,与单独使用SoC相比,uRDN加SoC可以改善每位患者的LYs和qaly,并且成本更高。每个国家模型的平均ICERs远低于各自国家特定的支付意愿阈值(WTPs)-比利时:WTP€40,000和ICER€4426/QALY;法国:WTP€50,000,ICER€6261/QALY获得;荷兰:WTP涨2万欧元,ICER涨1654欧元/QALY。结果在各种情景和敏感性分析中都是稳健的。结论:在比利时、法国和荷兰的医疗保健系统中,血管内uRDN的增加为临床医生和支付者提供了一种具有成本效益的辅助治疗方法,可以与高血压药物一起管理rHTN。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: PharmacoEconomics - Open focuses on applied research on the economic implications and health outcomes associated with drugs, devices and other healthcare interventions. The journal includes, but is not limited to, the following research areas:Economic analysis of healthcare interventionsHealth outcomes researchCost-of-illness studiesQuality-of-life studiesAdditional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in PharmacoEconomics -Open may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.All manuscripts are subject to peer review by international experts. Letters to the Editor are welcomed and will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信