Gardner-Wells Tongs Are a Safe Alternative for Intraoperative Positioning and Spine Surgery.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopedics Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-23 DOI:10.3928/01477447-20250410-01
Hikmat R Chmait, Dhiraj Patel, Gregory Roy, Chason Ziino
{"title":"Gardner-Wells Tongs Are a Safe Alternative for Intraoperative Positioning and Spine Surgery.","authors":"Hikmat R Chmait, Dhiraj Patel, Gregory Roy, Chason Ziino","doi":"10.3928/01477447-20250410-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gardner-Wells tongs (GWT) are commonly used in cervical spine trauma for closed and open treatment of the cervical spine and for patient positioning and reduction, aiding in fracture reduction and providing temporary stabilization. Tongs are less commonly used for nontraumatic spine surgery, and a paucity of literature exists assessing the rates of complications associated with the use of GWT. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the incidence of major and minor complications associated with the use of GWT in traumatic and nontraumatic spine surgeries performed by a single surgeon at a single tertiary care academic institution.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Adult patients who underwent traumatic or nontraumatic spinal surgery at any spine level with the use of GWT from a single surgeon between 2020 and 2023 met inclusion criteria for this retrospective case series. Major complications were defined as medial table breech, deep infection/abscess, pin pullout, neurovascular injury, and vision disturbances (ie, increased intraocular pressure) at any time point. Minor complications were defined as pin loosening, minor bleeding requiring staples, and superficial infection at any time point.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 322 patients, including 171 (53.1%) men and 151 (46.9%) women, were reviewed and analyzed. Mean patient age at the time of surgery was 57 years (range 18 to 89). Mean operative time was 165 minutes, and average traction weight applied was 14.7 pounds. Incidence of major complications was 0.3% and included just one instance of visual disturbance 6 weeks postoperatively that spontaneously resolved. Incidence of minor complications was 4.66% (15/322) and involved 14 cases (4.35%) of minor bleeding managed with staples and one occurrence of pin loosening.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of GWT in a variety of traumatic and nontraumatic spine surgeries was found to be safe and effective in this single-surgeon, single-institution study cohort. Only one patient developed a major complication, and the incidence of minor complications was less than 5%. [<i>Orthopedics</i>. 2025;48(3):153-158.].</p>","PeriodicalId":19631,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedics","volume":"48 3","pages":"153-158"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20250410-01","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gardner-Wells tongs (GWT) are commonly used in cervical spine trauma for closed and open treatment of the cervical spine and for patient positioning and reduction, aiding in fracture reduction and providing temporary stabilization. Tongs are less commonly used for nontraumatic spine surgery, and a paucity of literature exists assessing the rates of complications associated with the use of GWT. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the incidence of major and minor complications associated with the use of GWT in traumatic and nontraumatic spine surgeries performed by a single surgeon at a single tertiary care academic institution.

Materials and methods: Adult patients who underwent traumatic or nontraumatic spinal surgery at any spine level with the use of GWT from a single surgeon between 2020 and 2023 met inclusion criteria for this retrospective case series. Major complications were defined as medial table breech, deep infection/abscess, pin pullout, neurovascular injury, and vision disturbances (ie, increased intraocular pressure) at any time point. Minor complications were defined as pin loosening, minor bleeding requiring staples, and superficial infection at any time point.

Results: Data from 322 patients, including 171 (53.1%) men and 151 (46.9%) women, were reviewed and analyzed. Mean patient age at the time of surgery was 57 years (range 18 to 89). Mean operative time was 165 minutes, and average traction weight applied was 14.7 pounds. Incidence of major complications was 0.3% and included just one instance of visual disturbance 6 weeks postoperatively that spontaneously resolved. Incidence of minor complications was 4.66% (15/322) and involved 14 cases (4.35%) of minor bleeding managed with staples and one occurrence of pin loosening.

Conclusion: The use of GWT in a variety of traumatic and nontraumatic spine surgeries was found to be safe and effective in this single-surgeon, single-institution study cohort. Only one patient developed a major complication, and the incidence of minor complications was less than 5%. [Orthopedics. 2025;48(3):153-158.].

Gardner-Wells钳是术中定位和脊柱手术的安全选择。
背景:Gardner-Wells钳(GWT)通常用于颈椎外伤的闭合和开放治疗,以及患者定位和复位,帮助骨折复位和提供暂时稳定。钳在非创伤性脊柱手术中较少使用,并且缺乏评估与使用GWT相关的并发症发生率的文献。本研究的目的是阐明由同一位外科医生在同一家三级医疗学术机构进行的创伤性和非创伤性脊柱手术中使用GWT相关的主要和次要并发症的发生率。材料和方法:在2020年至2023年期间使用单一外科医生的GWT在任何脊柱水平接受创伤性或非创伤性脊柱手术的成年患者符合本回顾性病例系列的纳入标准。在任何时间点,主要并发症被定义为内侧台臀位、深部感染/脓肿、针拔出、神经血管损伤和视力障碍(即眼压升高)。轻微并发症定义为针松动,需要钉钉的轻微出血,以及任何时间点的浅表感染。结果:对322例患者的资料进行了回顾和分析,其中男性171例(53.1%),女性151例(46.9%)。手术时患者的平均年龄为57岁(18至89岁)。平均手术时间165分钟,平均牵引重量14.7磅。主要并发症发生率为0.3%,仅一例术后6周视力障碍自行消退。轻微并发症发生率为4.66%(15/322),其中14例(4.35%)使用钉钉处理轻微出血,1例发生钉钉松动。结论:在这个单医生、单机构的研究队列中,GWT在各种创伤性和非创伤性脊柱手术中的使用是安全有效的。仅有1例患者出现主要并发症,轻微并发症发生率低于5%。[矫形手术。48 2025;(3): 153 - 158。]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopedics
Orthopedics 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: For over 40 years, Orthopedics, a bimonthly peer-reviewed journal, has been the preferred choice of orthopedic surgeons for clinically relevant information on all aspects of adult and pediatric orthopedic surgery and treatment. Edited by Robert D''Ambrosia, MD, Chairman of the Department of Orthopedics at the University of Colorado, Denver, and former President of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, as well as an Editorial Board of over 100 international orthopedists, Orthopedics is the source to turn to for guidance in your practice. The journal offers access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content. Highlights also include Blue Ribbon articles published full text in print and online, as well as Tips & Techniques posted with every issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信