Daniel Schneider, Ethan D L Brown, Harshal A Shah, Sheng-Fu L Lo, Daniel M Sciubba
{"title":"Race, Region, and Reimbursement: Sociodemographic Variations in Medicare Payments for Spine Surgery in the United States, 2014-2022.","authors":"Daniel Schneider, Ethan D L Brown, Harshal A Shah, Sheng-Fu L Lo, Daniel M Sciubba","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Assess whether Medicare adjustments adequately correct for systemic population-level payment variations.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Medicare currently uses payment adjustments for spine surgery, including clinical risk, geography, and socioeconomic status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Medicare fee-for-service claims from 2014 to 2022, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of spine-related diagnosis-related groups (459 state-year observations). Multivariable regression models examined associations between payments and sociodemographic factors, controlling for existing Medicare adjustments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant disparities persisted despite adjustment. Each percentage-point increase in Black beneficiaries was associated with $172 higher payments (95% CI: $111-$232, P<0.001), while Hispanic population increases showed the opposite effect (-$174 per point; 95% CI: -$252 to -$96, P<0.001). Areas with above-median female proportions had $1596 higher payments (95% CI: $580-$2611, P=0.002). Regional variations were notable: payments were higher in the West ($11,060), Northeast ($5762), and Midwest ($3210) than in the South (all P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medicare payments for inpatient spine care demonstrate persistent demographic disparities unaddressed by current risk-adjustment models. Future research should determine whether these variations indicate appropriate adjustments for care needs or systematic underpayment or overpayment for the treatment of particular populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001834","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Summary of background data: Medicare currently uses payment adjustments for spine surgery, including clinical risk, geography, and socioeconomic status.
Methods: Using Medicare fee-for-service claims from 2014 to 2022, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of spine-related diagnosis-related groups (459 state-year observations). Multivariable regression models examined associations between payments and sociodemographic factors, controlling for existing Medicare adjustments.
Results: Significant disparities persisted despite adjustment. Each percentage-point increase in Black beneficiaries was associated with $172 higher payments (95% CI: $111-$232, P<0.001), while Hispanic population increases showed the opposite effect (-$174 per point; 95% CI: -$252 to -$96, P<0.001). Areas with above-median female proportions had $1596 higher payments (95% CI: $580-$2611, P=0.002). Regional variations were notable: payments were higher in the West ($11,060), Northeast ($5762), and Midwest ($3210) than in the South (all P<0.001).
Conclusions: Medicare payments for inpatient spine care demonstrate persistent demographic disparities unaddressed by current risk-adjustment models. Future research should determine whether these variations indicate appropriate adjustments for care needs or systematic underpayment or overpayment for the treatment of particular populations.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure.
Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.