Patients' Attitudes to Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Perianal Fistulizing Crohn's Disease: A Global Survey.

IF 1.8 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Crohn's & Colitis 360 Pub Date : 2025-03-12 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1093/crocol/otaf015
Easan Anand, Jalpa Devi, Anna Antoniou, Shivani Joshi, Jaap Stoker, Phillip Lung, Ailsa Hart, Phil Tozer, David H Ballard, Parakkal Deepak
{"title":"Patients' Attitudes to Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Perianal Fistulizing Crohn's Disease: A Global Survey.","authors":"Easan Anand, Jalpa Devi, Anna Antoniou, Shivani Joshi, Jaap Stoker, Phillip Lung, Ailsa Hart, Phil Tozer, David H Ballard, Parakkal Deepak","doi":"10.1093/crocol/otaf015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is limited patient involvement in radiological research for perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease (pfCD), despite magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)'s critical role in diagnosis and management. Patient and public involvement is essential for aligning research with patient priorities. This study aimed to gather patient perspectives on the use of MRI in pfCD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods approach was used, following Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public (GRIPP2) guidelines. An online survey, co-developed with a patient representative, included open and closed questions on MRI experiences, advantages, challenges, and the potential for Artificial Intelligence (AI)-generated reports. This was followed by a virtual session for further exploration of patient views. Thematic analysis was conducted on the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-seven patients with Crohn's disease (37 with pfCD) from 6 countries participated, with 28/37 (76%) completing the survey. Key themes included patient expectations for MRI, preferences for scan intervals, and report content. Most (93%) wanted MRI reports to compare with previous scans, highlighting fistula changes and new abscesses. A majority (57%) preferred MRI scans annually when well, and more frequently after surgery (64.3% preferred scans at 3 months). Emotional relief was associated with MRI improvements, though access to services and report clarity remained challenging. Interest in AI-generated reports was expressed if clearly explained and validated by professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study exploring patient views on MRI use in pfCD, emphasizing the need for patient-centred MRI reporting and clearer communication. Future work should enhance patient access and validate AI-generated MRI reports.</p>","PeriodicalId":10847,"journal":{"name":"Crohn's & Colitis 360","volume":"7 2","pages":"otaf015"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11983384/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crohn's & Colitis 360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/crocol/otaf015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is limited patient involvement in radiological research for perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease (pfCD), despite magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)'s critical role in diagnosis and management. Patient and public involvement is essential for aligning research with patient priorities. This study aimed to gather patient perspectives on the use of MRI in pfCD.

Methods: A mixed-methods approach was used, following Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public (GRIPP2) guidelines. An online survey, co-developed with a patient representative, included open and closed questions on MRI experiences, advantages, challenges, and the potential for Artificial Intelligence (AI)-generated reports. This was followed by a virtual session for further exploration of patient views. Thematic analysis was conducted on the data.

Results: Forty-seven patients with Crohn's disease (37 with pfCD) from 6 countries participated, with 28/37 (76%) completing the survey. Key themes included patient expectations for MRI, preferences for scan intervals, and report content. Most (93%) wanted MRI reports to compare with previous scans, highlighting fistula changes and new abscesses. A majority (57%) preferred MRI scans annually when well, and more frequently after surgery (64.3% preferred scans at 3 months). Emotional relief was associated with MRI improvements, though access to services and report clarity remained challenging. Interest in AI-generated reports was expressed if clearly explained and validated by professionals.

Conclusions: This is the first study exploring patient views on MRI use in pfCD, emphasizing the need for patient-centred MRI reporting and clearer communication. Future work should enhance patient access and validate AI-generated MRI reports.

全球范围内肛周瘘管性克罗恩病患者对磁共振成像的态度调查
背景:尽管磁共振成像(MRI)在诊断和治疗中起着关键作用,但很少有患者参与肛周瘘管性克罗恩病(pfCD)的放射学研究。患者和公众的参与对于使研究与患者优先事项保持一致至关重要。本研究旨在收集患者对MRI在pfCD中的应用的看法。方法:采用混合方法,遵循患者和公众参与报告指南(GRIPP2)指南。与患者代表共同开发了一项在线调查,包括关于MRI经验,优势,挑战以及人工智能(AI)生成报告的潜力的开放式和封闭式问题。随后是一个虚拟会议,以进一步探讨患者的意见。对数据进行了专题分析。结果:来自6个国家的47名克罗恩病患者(其中37名患有pfCD)参与了调查,其中28/37(76%)完成了调查。关键主题包括患者对MRI的期望、扫描间隔的偏好和报告内容。大多数患者(93%)希望MRI报告与之前的扫描结果进行比较,突出瘘管改变和新的脓肿。大多数患者(57%)在身体健康时更喜欢每年进行一次MRI扫描,术后更频繁(64.3%)。情绪缓解与MRI改善有关,尽管获得服务和报告清晰度仍然具有挑战性。如果专业人员对人工智能生成的报告进行了清楚的解释和验证,则表示对其感兴趣。结论:这是首个探讨患者对pfCD MRI应用看法的研究,强调以患者为中心的MRI报告和更清晰的沟通的必要性。未来的工作应加强患者获取和验证人工智能生成的MRI报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Crohn's & Colitis 360
Crohn's & Colitis 360 Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信