The role of preoperative ureteral stenting in retrograde intrarenal surgery outcomes for renal stones: a matched-pair analysis.

IF 1.9 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Central European Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-17 DOI:10.5173/ceju.2024.0105
Samet Senel, Huseyin Gultekin, Yalcin Kizilkan, Cuneyt Ozden, Kazim Ceviz, Antonios Koudonas, Ahmet Halil Sevinc
{"title":"The role of preoperative ureteral stenting in retrograde intrarenal surgery outcomes for renal stones: a matched-pair analysis.","authors":"Samet Senel, Huseyin Gultekin, Yalcin Kizilkan, Cuneyt Ozden, Kazim Ceviz, Antonios Koudonas, Ahmet Halil Sevinc","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2024.0105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ureteral stenting is not routinely recommended, but it may be performed before or after retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). We aimed to investigate the effect of preoperative ureteral stenting on the success rate and intraoperative, postoperative, and infectious complications in RIRS.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We retrospectively analysed the data of 581 patients who underwent RIRS. Demographic data, stone characteristics, presence of hydronephrosis, presence of congenital kidney anomaly and solitary kidney, duration of operation, and duration of hospitalisation were analysed. Intraoperative, postoperative, and infectious complications and the success rate of all operations were recorded. The patients were divided into 2 groups as prestented and non-prestented and matched in terms of age, sex, stone size, and number of stones. Ninety-four patients in the prestented group were matched with 282 patients in the non-prestented group with respect to age, sex, stone size, and number of stones (matched 1:3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 2 groups were similar in terms of matching parameters and all other characteristics. After matching, the success rate was 77.7% (73/94) in the prestented group and 78% (220/282) in the non--prestented group, and there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (p = 0.943). The intraoperative complication rate was statistically significantly higher in the non-prestented group (19.2% vs 28.7%, p = 0.046). Postoperative complications occurred in 22.3% of patients in the prestented group and 20.7% of patients in the non-prestented group (p = 0.429).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preoperative ureteral stenting in RIRS was not associated with the success rate or postoperative and infectious complications. However, preoperative stenting was effective in decreasing only grade 1 intraoperative complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"77 4","pages":"668-673"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12042397/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2024.0105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Ureteral stenting is not routinely recommended, but it may be performed before or after retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). We aimed to investigate the effect of preoperative ureteral stenting on the success rate and intraoperative, postoperative, and infectious complications in RIRS.

Material and methods: We retrospectively analysed the data of 581 patients who underwent RIRS. Demographic data, stone characteristics, presence of hydronephrosis, presence of congenital kidney anomaly and solitary kidney, duration of operation, and duration of hospitalisation were analysed. Intraoperative, postoperative, and infectious complications and the success rate of all operations were recorded. The patients were divided into 2 groups as prestented and non-prestented and matched in terms of age, sex, stone size, and number of stones. Ninety-four patients in the prestented group were matched with 282 patients in the non-prestented group with respect to age, sex, stone size, and number of stones (matched 1:3).

Results: The 2 groups were similar in terms of matching parameters and all other characteristics. After matching, the success rate was 77.7% (73/94) in the prestented group and 78% (220/282) in the non--prestented group, and there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (p = 0.943). The intraoperative complication rate was statistically significantly higher in the non-prestented group (19.2% vs 28.7%, p = 0.046). Postoperative complications occurred in 22.3% of patients in the prestented group and 20.7% of patients in the non-prestented group (p = 0.429).

Conclusions: Preoperative ureteral stenting in RIRS was not associated with the success rate or postoperative and infectious complications. However, preoperative stenting was effective in decreasing only grade 1 intraoperative complications.

术前输尿管支架置入在肾结石逆行肾内手术结果中的作用:配对分析。
导读:输尿管支架置入不是常规推荐,但可以在逆行肾内手术(RIRS)之前或之后进行。我们的目的是探讨术前输尿管支架置入术对RIRS手术成功率、术中、术后及感染并发症的影响。材料和方法:我们回顾性分析了581例接受RIRS的患者的资料。分析人口统计学资料、结石特征、有无肾积水、有无先天性肾异常和孤立肾、手术时间和住院时间。记录术中、术后、感染并发症及手术成功率。患者按年龄、性别、结石大小、结石数量相匹配,分为有症状组和无症状组。在年龄、性别、结石大小和结石数量方面,就诊组94例患者与未就诊组282例患者相匹配(匹配1:3)。结果:两组在匹配参数及其他各项特征上基本一致。配对后,有在场组的成功率为77.7%(73/94),无在场组的成功率为78%(220/282),两组比较差异无统计学意义(p = 0.943)。非住院组术中并发症发生率明显高于非住院组(19.2% vs 28.7%, p = 0.046)。术后出现并发症的比例在就诊组为22.3%,未就诊组为20.7% (p = 0.429)。结论:RIRS患者术前输尿管支架置入与成功率、术后感染并发症无关。然而,术前支架置入术仅能有效减少1级术中并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Central European Journal of Urology
Central European Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信