Identification and Validation of Amino Acid Metabolism-Related Biomarkers and Investigation of their Potential Mechanisms in Lung Adenocarcinoma.

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Xu Zhu, Ying Zhang, Peiying Pan, Xinlei Liu, Jian Zhang, Xiaojun Du, Tao Wang, Yin Teng, Chao Fan, Jianglun Li, Jieheng Wu, Zhu Zeng, Siyuan Yang
{"title":"Identification and Validation of Amino Acid Metabolism-Related Biomarkers and Investigation of their Potential Mechanisms in Lung Adenocarcinoma.","authors":"Xu Zhu, Ying Zhang, Peiying Pan, Xinlei Liu, Jian Zhang, Xiaojun Du, Tao Wang, Yin Teng, Chao Fan, Jianglun Li, Jieheng Wu, Zhu Zeng, Siyuan Yang","doi":"10.2174/0115665232364091250203090710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), the metabolism of amino acids (AAs) plays a crucial role in the growth, infiltration, and metastasis of tumor cells. Nevertheless, the potential of AA metabolism-associated genes (AAMRGs) to serve as prognostic indicators in LUAD remains ambiguous. Thus, this study sought to evaluate the prognostic value of AAMRGs in LUAD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Herein, we extracted LUAD transcriptomic information from two key repositories, namely The Cancer Genome Atlas Program (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus. The non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) clustering technique was used to categorize the LUAD cases based on their AAM profiles before assessing the survival rates and composition of immune cells. Using limma software, shared dysregulated transcripts were identified across subgroups before functional annotation via DAVID, which comprised exploration of gene ontology and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway. The prognostic framework was developed using five prognostic indicators through TCGA-derived LUAD specimens. We performed the analysis using singlevariable Cox, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression, and multi-factorial Cox regression. Molecular pathways between cohorts were compared with gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis were utilized to validate the key genetic components of the model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NMF clustering analysis was performed to categorize 497 LUAD patients into three distinct subgroups with obvious variations in the survival rates. The subtypes exhibited substantial disparities in immune cell populations, particularly in monocytes and mast cells. Analysis of 176 shared differentially expressed genes (DEGs) revealed enrichment in T lymphocyte stimulation, immunological reactions, and extra immune-related processes within the subgroups. The prognostic framework was constructed using biomarkers, such as ERO1LB, HPGDS, LOXL2, TMPRSS11E, and SLC34A2. Moreover, GSEA demonstrated a correlation between elevated risk and cell cycle processes, but lower risk was linked with arachidonic acid metabolic pathways. Analysis of 1128 DEGs revealed enrichment in various physiological processes, including cellular division, p53 signaling cascades, immunological responses, and additional pathways upon the comparison of high and low-risk cohorts. The RT-qPCR analysis confirmed elevated expression levels of ERO1LB and TMPRSS11E in LUAD specimens. Consistent with RT-qPCR analysis, the IHC results affirmed that the expression levels of ERO1LB and TMPRSS11E were increased in LUAD specimens.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The five identified AAMRGs in LUAD were validated and appropriately utilized to construct a risk assessment model that could potentially act as prognostic biomarkers for LUAD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10798,"journal":{"name":"Current gene therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current gene therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115665232364091250203090710","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), the metabolism of amino acids (AAs) plays a crucial role in the growth, infiltration, and metastasis of tumor cells. Nevertheless, the potential of AA metabolism-associated genes (AAMRGs) to serve as prognostic indicators in LUAD remains ambiguous. Thus, this study sought to evaluate the prognostic value of AAMRGs in LUAD patients.

Methods: Herein, we extracted LUAD transcriptomic information from two key repositories, namely The Cancer Genome Atlas Program (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus. The non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) clustering technique was used to categorize the LUAD cases based on their AAM profiles before assessing the survival rates and composition of immune cells. Using limma software, shared dysregulated transcripts were identified across subgroups before functional annotation via DAVID, which comprised exploration of gene ontology and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway. The prognostic framework was developed using five prognostic indicators through TCGA-derived LUAD specimens. We performed the analysis using singlevariable Cox, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression, and multi-factorial Cox regression. Molecular pathways between cohorts were compared with gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis were utilized to validate the key genetic components of the model.

Results: NMF clustering analysis was performed to categorize 497 LUAD patients into three distinct subgroups with obvious variations in the survival rates. The subtypes exhibited substantial disparities in immune cell populations, particularly in monocytes and mast cells. Analysis of 176 shared differentially expressed genes (DEGs) revealed enrichment in T lymphocyte stimulation, immunological reactions, and extra immune-related processes within the subgroups. The prognostic framework was constructed using biomarkers, such as ERO1LB, HPGDS, LOXL2, TMPRSS11E, and SLC34A2. Moreover, GSEA demonstrated a correlation between elevated risk and cell cycle processes, but lower risk was linked with arachidonic acid metabolic pathways. Analysis of 1128 DEGs revealed enrichment in various physiological processes, including cellular division, p53 signaling cascades, immunological responses, and additional pathways upon the comparison of high and low-risk cohorts. The RT-qPCR analysis confirmed elevated expression levels of ERO1LB and TMPRSS11E in LUAD specimens. Consistent with RT-qPCR analysis, the IHC results affirmed that the expression levels of ERO1LB and TMPRSS11E were increased in LUAD specimens.

Conclusion: The five identified AAMRGs in LUAD were validated and appropriately utilized to construct a risk assessment model that could potentially act as prognostic biomarkers for LUAD patients.

肺腺癌中氨基酸代谢相关生物标志物的鉴定和验证及其潜在机制的研究。
背景:在肺腺癌(LUAD)中,氨基酸(AAs)的代谢在肿瘤细胞的生长、浸润和转移中起着至关重要的作用。然而,AA代谢相关基因(AAMRGs)作为LUAD预后指标的潜力仍不明确。因此,本研究旨在评估AAMRGs在LUAD患者中的预后价值。方法:在此,我们从两个关键数据库中提取LUAD转录组信息,即癌症基因组图谱计划(TCGA)和基因表达Omnibus。在评估免疫细胞的存活率和组成之前,采用非负矩阵分解(NMF)聚类技术根据其AAM谱对LUAD病例进行分类。使用limma软件,在通过DAVID进行功能注释之前,跨亚群识别共享的失调转录本,其中包括基因本体和京都基因与基因组百科全书途径的探索。通过tcga衍生的LUAD标本,使用五个预后指标制定了预后框架。我们使用单变量Cox、最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归以及多因子Cox回归进行分析。用基因集富集分析(GSEA)比较队列间的分子通路。利用实时定量聚合酶链反应(RT-qPCR)和免疫组化(IHC)分析验证模型的关键遗传成分。结果:采用NMF聚类分析将497例LUAD患者分为生存率差异明显的3个亚组。这些亚型在免疫细胞群中表现出很大的差异,特别是在单核细胞和肥大细胞中。对176个共有差异表达基因(DEGs)的分析显示,在T淋巴细胞刺激、免疫反应和亚群内额外的免疫相关过程中富集。使用ERO1LB、HPGDS、LOXL2、TMPRSS11E和SLC34A2等生物标志物构建预后框架。此外,GSEA显示风险升高与细胞周期过程相关,但风险降低与花生四烯酸代谢途径相关。对1128个DEGs的分析显示,通过比较高风险和低风险队列,在多种生理过程中都有富集,包括细胞分裂、p53信号级联、免疫反应和其他途径。RT-qPCR分析证实LUAD标本中ERO1LB和TMPRSS11E的表达水平升高。与RT-qPCR分析一致,免疫组化结果证实了LUAD标本中ERO1LB和TMPRSS11E的表达水平升高。结论:在LUAD中鉴定的5个AAMRGs得到了验证,并被适当地用于构建风险评估模型,该模型可能作为LUAD患者预后的生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current gene therapy
Current gene therapy 医学-遗传学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.80%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Current Gene Therapy is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal aimed at academic and industrial scientists with an interest in major topics concerning basic research and clinical applications of gene and cell therapy of diseases. Cell therapy manuscripts can also include application in diseases when cells have been genetically modified. Current Gene Therapy publishes full-length/mini reviews and original research on the latest developments in gene transfer and gene expression analysis, vector development, cellular genetic engineering, animal models and human clinical applications of gene and cell therapy for the treatment of diseases. Current Gene Therapy publishes reviews and original research containing experimental data on gene and cell therapy. The journal also includes manuscripts on technological advances, ethical and regulatory considerations of gene and cell therapy. Reviews should provide the reader with a comprehensive assessment of any area of experimental biology applied to molecular medicine that is not only of significance within a particular field of gene therapy and cell therapy but also of interest to investigators in other fields. Authors are encouraged to provide their own assessment and vision for future advances. Reviews are also welcome on late breaking discoveries on which substantial literature has not yet been amassed. Such reviews provide a forum for sharply focused topics of recent experimental investigations in gene therapy primarily to make these results accessible to both clinical and basic researchers. Manuscripts containing experimental data should be original data, not previously published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信