Deep Learning for Detecting Periapical Bone Rarefaction in Panoramic Radiographs: A Systematic Review and Critical Assessment.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
José Evando da Silva-Filho, Zildenilson da Silva Sousa, Ana Paula Caracas de-Araújo, Lívia Dos Santos Fornagero, Milena Pinheiro Machado, André Wescley Oliveira de Aguiar, Caio Marques Silva, Danielle Frota de Albuquerque, Eduardo Diogo Gurgel-Filho
{"title":"Deep Learning for Detecting Periapical Bone Rarefaction in Panoramic Radiographs: A Systematic Review and Critical Assessment.","authors":"José Evando da Silva-Filho, Zildenilson da Silva Sousa, Ana Paula Caracas de-Araújo, Lívia Dos Santos Fornagero, Milena Pinheiro Machado, André Wescley Oliveira de Aguiar, Caio Marques Silva, Danielle Frota de Albuquerque, Eduardo Diogo Gurgel-Filho","doi":"10.1093/dmfr/twaf044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate deep learning (DL)-based models for detecting periapical bone rarefaction (PBRs) in panoramic radiographs (PRs), analyzing their feasibility and performance in dental practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search was conducted across seven databases and partial grey literature up to November 15, 2024, using Medical Subject Headings and entry terms related to DL, PBRs, and PRs. Studies assessing DL-based models for detecting and classifying PBRs in conventional PRs were included, while those using non-PR imaging or focusing solely on non-PBR lesions were excluded. Two independent reviewers performed screening, data extraction, and quality assessment using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool, with conflicts resolved by a third reviewer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria, mostly from Asia (58.3%). The risk of bias was moderate in 10 studies (83.3%) and high in 2 (16.7%). DL models showed moderate to high performance in PBR detection (sensitivity: 26-100%; specificity: 51-100%), with U-NET and YOLO being the most used algorithms. Only one study (8.3%) distinguished Periapical Granuloma from Periapical Cysts, revealing a classification gap. Key challenges included limited generalization due to small datasets, anatomical superimpositions in PRs, and variability in reported metrics, compromising models comparison.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review underscores that DL-based has the potential to become a valuable tool in dental image diagnostics, but it cannot yet be considered a definitive practice. Multicenter collaboration is needed to diversify data and democratize those tools. Standardized performance reporting is critical for fair comparability between different models.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twaf044","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate deep learning (DL)-based models for detecting periapical bone rarefaction (PBRs) in panoramic radiographs (PRs), analyzing their feasibility and performance in dental practice.

Methods: A search was conducted across seven databases and partial grey literature up to November 15, 2024, using Medical Subject Headings and entry terms related to DL, PBRs, and PRs. Studies assessing DL-based models for detecting and classifying PBRs in conventional PRs were included, while those using non-PR imaging or focusing solely on non-PBR lesions were excluded. Two independent reviewers performed screening, data extraction, and quality assessment using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool, with conflicts resolved by a third reviewer.

Results: Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria, mostly from Asia (58.3%). The risk of bias was moderate in 10 studies (83.3%) and high in 2 (16.7%). DL models showed moderate to high performance in PBR detection (sensitivity: 26-100%; specificity: 51-100%), with U-NET and YOLO being the most used algorithms. Only one study (8.3%) distinguished Periapical Granuloma from Periapical Cysts, revealing a classification gap. Key challenges included limited generalization due to small datasets, anatomical superimpositions in PRs, and variability in reported metrics, compromising models comparison.

Conclusion: This review underscores that DL-based has the potential to become a valuable tool in dental image diagnostics, but it cannot yet be considered a definitive practice. Multicenter collaboration is needed to diversify data and democratize those tools. Standardized performance reporting is critical for fair comparability between different models.

深度学习在全景x线片上检测根尖周骨稀疏:系统回顾和关键评估。
目的:评价基于深度学习(DL)的全景x线片根尖周骨稀疏(PBRs)检测模型,分析其在牙科实践中的可行性和性能。方法:检索七个数据库和部分灰色文献,截止到2024年11月15日,使用医学主题标题和与DL、pbr和pr相关的词条。评估基于dl的模型在常规pr中检测和分类pbr的研究被纳入,而那些使用非pr成像或仅关注非pbr病变的研究被排除在外。两名独立审查员使用诊断准确性研究质量评估-2工具进行筛选、数据提取和质量评估,冲突由第三名审查员解决。结果:12项研究符合纳入标准,主要来自亚洲(58.3%)。10项研究的偏倚风险为中等(83.3%),2项为高偏倚风险(16.7%)。DL模型在PBR检测中表现出中高的性能(灵敏度:26-100%;特异性:51-100%),其中U-NET和YOLO是最常用的算法。只有一项研究(8.3%)区分了根尖周肉芽肿和根尖周囊肿,显示了分类差距。主要的挑战包括由于数据集小而泛化有限,pr中的解剖重叠,以及报告指标的可变性,影响了模型的比较。结论:这篇综述强调了基于dl的牙科图像诊断有潜力成为一种有价值的工具,但它还不能被认为是一个确定的做法。需要多中心协作来实现数据的多样化和工具的民主化。标准化的性能报告对于不同模型之间的公平可比性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
65
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging. Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology. The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919 - Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks - Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks - Open access option - ISSN: 0250-832X - eISSN: 1476-542X
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信